This article examines the characteristics that shape different public reactions to analogies of historical events while emphasizing the role of national identity. It analyzes responses by Israeli Jews to comparisons between the situation of African asylum seekers in Israel and Jews during the Holocaust via a letter written by Holocaust survivors against the proposed forced deportation of asylum seekers in 2018. A population-based survey experiment conducted during Holocaust Remembrance Day was used to evaluate whether attitudes toward the expulsion of asylum seekers were affected by the analogy. The findings showed differential responses to the analogy, including acceptance, rejection, and ambivalence, which demographic characteristics, unlike aspects of national identity, do not explain. It was also found that participation in Holocaust Remembrance Day commemorations was positively related to acceptance of the analogy. The overall conclusion is that responses to historical analogy are determined more by an individual’s identity and not by demographic factors.
Anteby-YeminiL (2017) African asylum-seekers in Israel: illegalization, incorporation and race relations. Hagira7: 7–20 (in Hebrew).
2.
BischopingKKalminA (1999) Public opinion about comparisons to the Holocaust. Public Opinion Quarterly63(4): 485–507.
3.
BonikowskiB (2016) Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology42(1): 427–449.
4.
CanettiDHirschbergerGRapaportC, et al. (2018) Collective trauma from the lab to the real world: the effects of the Holocaust on contemporary Israeli political cognitions: Holocaust political cognitions. Political Psychology39(1): 3–21.
5.
CanettiDSniderKLPedersenA, et al. (2016) Threatened or threatening? How ideology shapes asylum seekers’ immigration policy attitudes in Israel and Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies29(4): 583–606.
6.
DavidovE (2009) Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Political Analysis17(1): 64–82.
7.
DumanYH (2015) Infiltrators go home! Explaining xenophobic mobilization against asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of International Migration and Integration16(4): 1231–1254.
8.
EssesVMHamiltonLKGaucherD (2017) The global refugee crisis: empirical evidence and policy implications for improving public attitudes and facilitating refugee resettlement. Social Issues and Policy Review11(1): 78–123.
9.
FeldmanJ (2008) Above the Death Pits, Beneath the Flag: Youth Voyages to Poland and the Performance of Israeli National Identity. 1st ed. New York: Berghahn Books.
10.
GhilaniDLuminetOErbH, et al. (2017) Looking forward to the past: an interdisciplinary discussion on the use of historical analogies and their effects. Memory Studies10(3): 274–285.
11.
GilI (2012) The Shoah in Israeli collective memory: changes in meanings and protagonists. Modern Judaism32(1): 76–101.
12.
Hercowitz-AmirARaijmanRDavidovE (2017) Host or hostile? Attitudes towards asylum seekers in Israel and in Denmark. International Journal of Comparative Sociology58(5): 416–439.
13.
HerzogB (2009) Between nationalism and humanitarianism: the glocal discourse on refugees. Nations and Nationalism15(2): 185–205.
14.
HiltonDJLiuJH (2017) History as the narrative of a people: from function to structure and content. Memory Studies10(3): 297–309.
15.
HirschbergerGKendeAWeinsteinS (2016) Defensive representations of an uncomfortable history: the case of Hungary and the Holocaust. International Journal of Intercultural Relations55: 32–43.
16.
HirschbergerGLifshinUSeemanS, et al. (2017) When criticism is ineffective: the case of historical trauma and unsupportive allies. European Journal of Social Psychology47(3): 304–319.
17.
HochmanO (2015) Infiltrators or asylum seekers? Framing and attitudes toward asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies13(4): 358–378.
18.
HochmanOHercowitz-AmirA (2017) (Dis) agreement with the implementation of humanitarian policy measures towards asylum seekers in Israel: does the frame matter?Journal of International Migration and Integration18(3): 897–916.
19.
HuddyL (2016) Unifying national identity research. In: GrimmJHuddyLSchmidtP, et al. (eds) Dynamics of National Identity: Media and Societal Factors of What We Are. London: Routledge, pp. 9–21.
20.
JamalA (2004) The ambiguities of minority patriotism: love for homeland versus state among Palestinian citizens of Israel. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics10(3): 433–471.
21.
KalirB (2015) The Jewish state of anxiety: between moral obligation and fearism in the treatment of African asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(4): 580–598.
22.
KansteinerW (2010) Memory, media and Menschen: where is the individual in collective memory studies?Memory Studies3(1): 3–4.
23.
KirkwoodS (2019) History in the service of politics: constructing narratives of history during the European refugee “crisis.”Political Psychology40(2): 297–313.
24.
KlarYSchori-EyalNKlarY (2013) The “never again” state of Israel: the emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues69(1): 125–143.
25.
Kligler-VilenchikNTsfatiYMeyersO (2014) Setting the collective memory agenda: examining mainstream media influence on individuals’ perceptions of the past. Memory Studies7(4): 484–499.
26.
KornprobstM (2007) Comparing apples and oranges? Leading and misleading uses of historical analogies. Millennium36(1): 29–49.
27.
LevyDSznaiderN (2006) The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
LiuJHHiltonDJ (2005) How the past weighs on the present: social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology44(4): 537–556.
29.
LustickIS (2017) The Holocaust in Israeli political culture: four constructions and their consequences. Contemporary Jewry37(1): 125–170.
30.
LynchDJ (2009) Does analogical reasoning affect political attitudes? Evidence from survey experiments. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
31.
McCroneDMcPhersonG (2009) Introduction. In: McCroneDMcPhersonG (eds) National Days: Constructing and Mobilizing National Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–10.
32.
MacDonaldDB (2007) Identity Politics in the Age of Genocide: The Holocaust and Historical Representation. London: Routledge.
33.
MannR (1998) It’s Inconceivable. Or Yehuda: Hed Arzi (in Hebrew).
34.
MassadJ (2000) Palestinians and Jewish history: recognition or submission?Journal of Palestine Studies30(1): 52–67.
35.
MeyersOZandbergENeigerM (2014) Communicating Awe: Media Memory and Holocaust Commemoration. London: Parlgrave Macmillan.
36.
NiliS (2011) The nuclear (and the) Holocaust: Israel, Iran, and the shadows of Auschwitz. Journal of Strategic Security4(1): 37–56.
37.
NoonDH (2004) Operation enduring analogy: World War II, the war on terror, and the uses of historical memory. Rhetoric & Public Affairs7(3): 339–364.
38.
OlickJK (1999) Collective memory: the two cultures. Sociological Theory17(3): 333–348.
39.
PedersenAAttwellJHeveliD (2005) Prediction of negative attitudes toward Australian asylum seekers: false beliefs, nationalism, and self-esteem. Australian Journal of Psychology57(3): 148–160.
40.
RamMYacobiH (2012) African asylum seekers and the changing politics of memory in Israel. In: KleistJGlynnI (eds) History, Memory and Migration Perceptions of the Past and the Politics of Incorporation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 154–170.
41.
RoccasSKlarYLiviatanI (2006) The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(4): 698–711.
42.
SabarG (2010) Israel and the Holy Land: the religio-political discourse of rights among African migrant laborers and African asylum seekers, 1990–2008. African Diaspora3(1): 42–75.
43.
SchatzRTStaubELavineH (1999) On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology20(1): 151–174.
44.
SchudsonM (1997) Lives, laws, and language: commemorative versus non-commemorative forms of effective public memory. The Communication Review2(1): 3–17.
45.
SchumanHRiegerC (1992) Historical analogies, generational effects, and attitudes toward war. American Sociological Review57(3): 315–326.
46.
SchumanHVinitzky-SeroussiVVinokurAD (2003) Keeping the past alive: memories of Israeli Jews at the turn of the millennium. Sociological Forum18(1): 103–136.
47.
ScottJZacL (1993) Collective memories in Britain and the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly57(3): 315–331.
48.
SmeekesAVerkuytenMPoppeE (2011) Mobilizing opposition towards Muslim immigrants: national identification and the representation of national history. British Journal of Social Psychology50(2): 265–280.
49.
SmithAD (1981) War and ethnicity: the role of warfare in the formation, self-images and cohesion of ethnic communities. Ethnic and Racial Studies4(4): 375–397.
50.
TaylorAJRourkeJT (1995) Historical analogies in the congressional foreign policy process. The Journal of Politics57(2): 460–468.
51.
Theiss-MorseE (2009) Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
WagnerUBeckerJCChristO, et al. (2012) A longitudinal test of the relation between German nationalism, patriotism, and outgroup derogation. European Sociological Review28(3): 319–332.
53.
WeinblumS (2019) Conflicting imaginaries of the border: the construction of African asylum seekers in the Israeli political discourse. Journal of Borderlands Studies34(5): 699–715.
54.
WillenS (2010) Darfur through a Shoah lens: Sudanese asylum seekers, unruly biopolitical dramas, and the politics of humanitarian compassion in Israel. In: GoodBDelvecchioMWillenS, et al. (eds) A Reader in Medical Anthropology: Theoretical Trajectories, Emergent Realities. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 505–521.
55.
YaronHHashimshony-YaffeNCampbellJ (2013) “Infiltrators” or refugees? An analysis of Israel’s policy towards African asylum-seekers. International Migration51(4): 144–157.
56.
ZandbergE (2010) The right to tell the (right) story: journalism, authority and memory. Media, Culture & Society32(1): 5–24.
57.
ZelizerB (1995) Reading the past against the grain: the shape of memory studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication12: 213–239.
58.
ZertalI (2005) Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
ZerubavelE (2003) Calendars and history: a comparative study of the social organization of national memory. In: OlickJK (ed.) States of Memory: Continuities, Conflicts and Transformation in National Retrospection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 317–337.
60.
ZerubavelY (2017) Response to Ian Lustick’s “the holocaust in Israeli political culture: four constructions and their consequences.”Contemporary Jewry37(1): 193–196.
