A majority of today’s visitors to the Auschwitz memorial site take photos to document their stay. By calling attention to visitors’ photography on site, this article investigates the role of visual perception and visual techniques of memory for visits to memorial sites and empirically discusses the significance of historical imagination in linking the past with the present. Visitors’ photography at Auschwitz can be considered a mnemonic practice because seemingly lookalike, amateur pictures express modes of experience which are negotiated within an ethical and social framework. The strongest emotional impulse expressed in amateur photography on site is the feeling of the sublime, which supports the need to promote moral ideas like freedom or justice in the face of the past. Through participant-orientated research, this article contends that visual perception regulates sensual impressions during a visit and identifies six dominant photographic genres through which visitors focus their historical understanding of the site. Single images function within this as “storyboards” because of their strong narrative as well as mnemonic quality.
AlexanderJCBartmanskiD (2012) Materiality and meaning in social life: Toward an iconic turn in cultural sociology. In: AlexanderJCBartmanskiDGiesenB (eds) Iconic Power. Materiality and Meaning in Social Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–12.
2.
AssmannA (1999) Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandel des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. Munich: C.H. Beck.
3.
BaerU (2000) To give memory a place: Holocaust photography and the landscape tradition. Representations69: 38–62.
4.
BarthesR (1982) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. London: Jonathan Cape.
5.
BenjaminW (1999) Das Passagen-Werk [The Arcades Project] (trans. EilandHMcLaughlinK). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
BergerJ (2008) Ways of Seeing. London: The British Broadcasting Corporation/Penguin Books.
7.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books/Random House.
8.
BohnsackR (2008) The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research9(3): 26.
9.
BrinkC (2000) Secular icons: Looking at photographs from Nazi concentration camps. History & Memory12(1): 135–50.
10.
BurkeE ([1757] 2008) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. New York: Mineola.
11.
EdensorT (2005) Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg.
12.
FeldmanJ (2008) Above the Death Pits, beneath the Flag: Youth Voyages to Poland and the Performance of Israeli National Identity. New York: Berghahn Books.
13.
GudehusC (2004) Methodische Überlegungen zu einer Wirkungsforschung in Gedenkstätten. In: GabrielRKoslovEMNeuhoferM (eds) Lagersystem und Repräsentation: Interdisziplinäre Studien zur Geschichte der Konzentrationslager. Tübingen: Edition Diskord, pp. 206–19.
14.
GuerinFHallasR (2007) (eds) The Image and the Witness: Trauma, Memory and Visual Culture. London: Wallflower Press.
15.
HalbwachsM (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
HaldrupMLarsenJ (2003) The family gaze. Tourist Studies3(1): 23–46.
17.
HarperD (2002) Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies17(1): 13–26.
18.
HartmanG (1996) The Longest Shadow: In the Aftermath of the Holocaust. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
19.
HirschM (2001) Surviving images: Holocaust photographs and the work of postmemory. In: ZelizerB (ed.) Visual Culture and the Holocaust. London: Athlone Press, pp. 215–46.
20.
HirschMSpitzerL (2009) The witness in the archive: Holocaust studies/memory studies. Memory Studies2(2): 151–70.
21.
HughesR (2008) Dutiful tourism: Encountering the Cambodian genocide. Asia Pacific Viewpoint49(3): 318–30.
22.
JacobsJ (2008) Gender and collective memory: Women and representation at Auschwitz. Memory Studies1(2): 211–25.
23.
JayM (1988) Scopic regimes of modernity. In: FosterH (ed.) Vision and Visuality. Seattle, WA: Bay Press, pp. 3–23.
24.
KantI ([1790] 1989) Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
25.
KaplanBA (2007) Unwanted Beauty: Aesthetic Pleasure in Holocaust Representation. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
26.
KirstK (1994) Walter Benjamin’s “Denkbild”: Emblematic historiography of the recent past. Monatshefte86(4): 514–24.
27.
LarsenJ (2005) Families seen sightseeing: Performativity of tourist photography. Space and Culture8(4): 416–34.
28.
LennonJFoleyM (2000) Dark Tourism: The Attraction of Death and Disaster. London: Continuum.
29.
LevyDSznaiderN (2006) Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
LissA (1998) Trespassing through Shadows: Memory, Photography & the Holocaust. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
LyotardJF (1994) Lessons in the Analytic of the Sublime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
MannheimK (1980) Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
33.
Memorial Auschwitz-Birkenau (2009) Postcards: Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II-Birkenau (2x10 postcards). Oświęcim: Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum.
34.
Memorial Auschwitz-Birkenau (2012) Report 2012. Available at: http://en.auschwitz.org (accessed 3 February 2013).
35.
MitchellWJT (1986) Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
MitchellWJT (1994) Picture Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
MurrayS (2008) Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions everyday aesthetics. Journal of Visual Culture7(2): 147–63.
38.
OlickJK (1999) Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory17(3): 333–48.
39.
PampelB (2007) “Mit eigenen Augen sehen, wozu der Mensch fähig ist”: Zur Wirkung von Gedenkstätten auf ihre Besucher. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
40.
RadleyA (2010) What people do with pictures. Visual Studies25(3): 268–79.
41.
StoneP (2009) Making absent death present: Consuming dark tourism in contemporary society. In: SharpleyRStoneP (eds) The Darker Side of Travel: Theory and Practice of Dark Tourism. Bristol: Channel View Publications, pp. 23–38.
42.
SturkenM (2007) Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
TreziseB (2014) Performing Feeling in Cultures of Memory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
UrryJLarsenJ (2011) The Tourist Gaze 3.0. London: SAGE.
45.
Van AlphenE (1997) Caught by History: Holocaust Effects in Contemporary Art, Literature and Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
Van DijckJ (2007) Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
WeissmanG (2004) Fantasies of Witnessing: Postwar Efforts to Experience the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
YoungJE (1988) Writing and Re-Writing the Holocaust: Narrative and the Consequences of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
49.
ZelizerB (1999) Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
50.
ZelizerB (2002) Finding aids to the past: Bearing personal witness to traumatic public events. Media, Culture & Society24(5): 697–714.
