Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores the media representation of the Taliban in Pakistan, China and the US following their 2021 return to power. Employing Fairclough’s (1992) critical discourse analysis framework outlined in his article in Discourse & Society 3(2), the study compares The New York Times, Dawn and China Daily narratives depicting the Taliban rule between 2021 and 2024. The authors reveal how national interests and geopolitical factors influence these portrayals. The US media typically frames the Taliban as a threat to global stability and human rights, particularly regarding treatment of women. In contrast, the media in Pakistan and China adopt a more pragmatic stance, emphasizing regional security, stability and economic cooperation. The analysis highlights the historical, political and ideological contexts that underpin these differing perspectives. Ultimately, this study enhances our understanding of the media’s role in shaping international discourse, demonstrating how news outlets reflect the strategic interests of their respective nations.

Keywords

critical discourse analysis geopolitics media portrayal strategic interests Taliban

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbari

True

(2022) One year on from the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan: Re-instituting gender apartheid. Australian Journal of International Affairs 76(6): 624–633. DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2022.2107172.

Akhtar

(2023) Pakistan’s nuclear policy amid the Russia–Ukraine conflict. The Nonproliferation Review 30(4/6): 285–301. DOI: 10.1080/10736700.2024.2435710.

Akram

Nasar

Perveen

(2024) Decoding social media’s role in Taliban 2.0 and its implications for afghan youth. Analysis from the East-West Center 27(168): 1–8.

Bennett

Pfetsch

(2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication 68(2): 243–253. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqx017.

Clarke

Saltskog

(2023) Afghanistan as a site of U.S.-China competition | lawfare. Available at: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/afghanistan-site-us-china-competition (accessed 10 December 2023).

David

(2021) Kabul’s sudden fall to Taliban ends U.S. era in Afghanistan. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/15/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-kabul-surrender.html (accesssed 10 December 2023).

De Vreese

Kandyla

(2009) News framing and public support for a common foreign and security policy*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47(3): 453–481. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-5965.2009.01812.X.

Dolokhova

Soboleva

(2024) The view on the Situation in Afghanistan in the Chinese Media within China’s National Security. RUDN Journal of Political Science 26(1): 50–61.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.

10.

Entman

(2010) Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008. Journalism 11(4): 389–408.

11.

Faheem

Khan

(2022) Recognition in international law: A functional reappraisal. Strategic Studies 42(1): 81–96. DOI: 10.2307/1598995.

12.

Fairclough

(1992) Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2): 193–217. DOI: 10.1177/0957926592003002004.

13.

Hess

Mehlman

(2022) A comparative analysis of the Afghan Taliban and the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan ideologies following the 2021 takeover of Afghanistan. Global Security and Intelligence Studies 7(2): 25. DOI: 10.18278/gsis.7.2.4.

14.

Hussain

Jehangir

(2024) Coverage of Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in the international press: A perspective on indexing theory. Journalism 25(3): 692–709. DOI: 10.1177/14648849231153727.

15.

Hussain

Latif

DMI

(2020) Issues and challenges in Pakistan–Afghanistan relations after 9/11. South Asian Studies 27(1). Available at: http://111.68.103.26/journals/index.php/IJSAS/article/view/2842 (accessed 10 December 2023).

16.

Khaliq

Rul

(2023) Taliban Warn Against Threatening Independence of Afghanistan. Anatolia Agency. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/taliban-warn-against-threatening-independence-of-afghanistan/2968041# (accessed 10 December 2023).

17.

Kotokey

Borthakur

(2021) The ideological trajectory within the Taliban movement in Afghanistan. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies 15(2): 205–219. DOI: 10.1080/25765949.2021.1928415.

18.

Kuo

(2021) China in Afghanistan: How Beijing Engages the Taliban – The Diplomat. The Diplomat. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/china-in-afghanistan-how-beijing-engages-the-taliban/ (accessed 10 December 2023).

19.

Landis

Koch

(1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33(2): 363. DOI: 10.2307/2529786.

20.

Maizland

(2023) The Taliban in Afghanistan. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/taliban-afghanistan (accessed 10 December 2023).

21.

Malik

Iqbal

(2011) Construction of Taliban image in Pakistan: Discourse analysis of editorials of Dawn and The News. China Media Research Journal 7(2): 46–56.

22.

Marchi

(2010) ‘The moral in the story’: A diachronic investigation of lexicalised morality in the UK press. Corpora 5(2): 161–189. DOI: 10.3366/COR.2010.0104.

23.

Muzaffar

(2021) Taliban have broken ‘the shackles of slavery,’ says Pakistan PM Imran Khan | The Independent. Independent. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/south-asia/taliban-pakistan-imran-khan-afghanistan-b1903821.html (accessed 11 December 2023).

24.

Report AI (2023) Human Rights in Afghanistan. Amnesty International. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/afghanistan/report-afghanistan/ (accessed 11 December 2023).

25.

Reuters (2021) More than 60 countries say Afghans, others must be allowed to leave Afghanistan. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/more-than-60-countries-say-afghans-others-must-be-allowed-leave-afghanistan-2021-08-16/ (accessed 11 December 2023).

26.

Ruttig

(2021) Have the Taliban changed? CTC Sentinel 14(3): 33–39.

27.

Sarbiland

Stanikzai

(2024) Qosh Tepa Canal Impact On Economic Development: Historical Significance And Assessing SDGs 2030 In Afghanistan. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 30(7): 593–601.

28.

Siddiqui

Naureen

(2024) China-Afghanistan Relations: Implications for China in the Post-US Military Exit from Afghanistan. UCP Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (HEC Recognized-Y Category) 2(2): 55–71.

29.

Smith

(2011) The China–Pakistan–United States strategic triangle: From cold war to the ‘war on terrorism’. Asian Affairs: An American Review 38(4): 197–220. DOI: 10.1080/00927678.2011.604291.

30.

Speer

(2017) Reframing the Iraq war: Official sources, dramatic events, and changes in media framing. Journal of Communication 67(2): 282–302. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12289.

31.

Stone

(2021) Afghan scholars despair after Taliban’s takeover: Many scramble to leave the country in fear of return to harsh ‘antiscience’ rule. Science 373(6558): 948–949. DOI: 10.1126/SCIENCE.373.6558.948.

32.

Van Dijk

(1995) Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & society 6(2): 243–289.

33.

Van Dijk

(2012) Knowledge, discourse and domination. In: Meeuwis

Östman

J-O

(eds) Pragmaticizing Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.170.10dij.

34.

Van Leeuwen

(2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.

35.

Van Leeuwen

Wodak

(1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. DOI: 10.1177/1461445699001001005.

36.

Verma

(2024) India–China rivalry, China–Pakistan quasi-alliance, terrorism, and asymmetric balancing. India Review 23(4): 370–395. DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2024.2382602.

37.

Weinstein

(2023) The west must change its Taliban strategy. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/23/taliban-afghanistan-diplomatic-strategy-united-states/ (accessed 11 December 2023).

38.

Zappettini

Rezazadah

(2024) Communication strategies on Twitter: A critical discourse analysis of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. International Journal of Strategic Communication 18(2): 115–131. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2023.2280555.

39.

Zhao

(2009) Rethinking Chinese media studies: History, political economy and culture. Internationalizing Media Studies. London: Routledge, 175–195.

Reframing the Taliban: A critical discourse analysis of media narratives in Pakistan,China and the United States

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References