Research on foreign news coverage suggests that journalists tend to exhibit an ethnocentric bias when reporting on issues that might reflect poorly upon their nation. This stems from the institutional, commercial and cultural pressures that tend to shape the news production process. These pressures are at odds with other professional norms and values within journalism that are seen as crucial to democracy, including the need to inform the public, hold leaders accountable and expose abuses of power. This study examines these tensions in the context of US drone warfare. The authors employ social identity theory to systematically examine the manner and extent to which civilian casualties caused by US drone strikes were reported on in news coverage in the US (The New York Times) versus the UK (The Guardian) from 2009–2016. The article explores whether civilian casualty mentions in these news sources led to a more critical examination of the merits and efficacy of the drone policy.
AdaySLivingstonSHebertM (2005) Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq War. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10(1): 3–21. DOI: 10.1177/1081180X05275727.
2.
AndersonB (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
3.
AslamMW (2011) A critical evaluation of American drone strikes in Pakistan: Legality, legitimacy and prudence. Critical Studies on Terrorism4(3): 313–329. DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2011.623397.
4.
BachmanJ (2017) The New York Times and Washington Post: Misleading the public about US drone strikes. Journalism Studies18(4): 470–494. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1073118
5.
BanduraA (1990) Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues46(1): 27–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x
6.
BanduraA (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review3(3): 193–209. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.
7.
BennettWLLawrenceRGLivingstonS (2008) When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BilligM (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE.
9.
BlatzCWSchumannKRossM (2009) Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology30(2): 219–241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x.
ClausenL (2003) Global News Production. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
12.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x.
13.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
14.
FinlayWML (2018) Language and civilian deaths: Denying responsibility for casualties in the Gaza conflict 2014. Political Psychology39(3): 595–609. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12426.
15.
GansHJ (1980) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York, NY: Vintage.
16.
GilmoreJRowlingCM (2021). Exceptional me: How Donald Trump exploited the discourse of American exceptionalism. London: I.B. Taurus/Bloomsbury Publishing.
17.
HafezK (2000) Islam and the West in the Mass Media: Fragmented Images in a Globalizing World. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
18.
HolewinskiS (2015) Just trust us: The need to know more about the civilian impact of US drone strikes. In: BergenPLRothenbergD (eds.) Drone Wars: Transforming Conflict, Law, and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 42–70.
19.
HutchesonJ, et al (2004) U.S. national identity, political elites, and a patriotic press following September 11. Political Communication21(4): 27–50. DOI: 10.1080/10584600490273254.
20.
JohnsRJDaviesGAM (2019) Civilian casualties and public support for military action: Experimental evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(1): 251–281.
KolmerCSemetkoHA (2009) Framing the Iraq War: Perspectives from American, U.K., Czech, German, South African, and Al-Jazeera News. American Behavioral Scientist52(5): 643–656. DOI: 10.1177/00027642083265.
23.
KrepsS (2014) Flying under the radar: A study of public attitudes towards unmanned aerial vehicles. Research and Politics1(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.1177/2053168014536533.
24.
MercerJ (1995) Anarchy and identity. International Organization49(2): 229–252. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300028381.
RivenburghNK (2000) Social identity theory and news portrayals of citizens involved in international affairs. Media Psychology2(4): 303–329. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0204_01.
27.
RonJLavineHGoldenS (2019) No, Americans don’t support airstrikes that kill civilians, even when they target terrorists. Washington Post, May 6.
28.
RowlingCMBlauwkampJ (2022) Hear no evil, see no evil: Motivated reasoning and the effects of message framing on US public opinion of drone warfare. International Journal of Public Opinion Research34(1). DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edab030
29.
RowlingCMGilmoreJMcCueP. (2021). Against the grain: Elite consensus, press independence and the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War. Journalism Studies22(15): 2122–2138. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2021.1986116
30.
RowlingCMJonesT MSheetsP. (2011). Some dared call it torture: Cultural resonance, Abu Ghraib, and a selectively echoing press. Journal of Communication61: 1043–1061. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01600.x
31.
RowlingCMPenelopeSPettitW, et al. (2018). Consensus at home, opposition abroad: Officials, foreign sources and U.S. news coverage of drone warfare. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly95(4): 886–908. DOI: 10.1177/1077699017742092
32.
SheetsPRowlingCMJonesTM (2015). The view from above (and below): A comparison of American, British, and Arab news coverage of U.S. drones. Media, War and Conflict8(3): 289–311. DOI: 10.1177/1750635215593973
33.
SheetsPRowlingCMGilmoreJ, et al. (2023). Us and them: Social identity, framing effects and public opinion in response to military atrocities. Mass Communication and Society26(2): 252–274. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2022.2026399
34.
SlatteryKDoremusM (2012) Suppressing Allied atrocity stories: The unwritten clause of the World War II censorship code. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly89(4): 624–642. DOI: 10.1177/1077699012455999.
35.
TajfelH (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33: 1–39. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
36.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In: WorchelAAustinWG (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 7–24.
37.
WalshJI (2015) Precision weapons, civilian casualties, and support for the use of force. Political Psychology36(5): 507–523. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12175.
38.
WohlMJABranscombeNR (2008) Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94: 988–1006. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.988.
39.
WolfsfeldG (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
WolfsfeldG (2004) Media and the Path to Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
WolfsfeldGFroshPAwabdyMT (2008) Covering death in conflicts: Coverage of the second antifada on Israeli and Palestinian television. Journal of Peace Research45(3): 401–417. DOI: 10.1177/0022343308088818.
