The witnessing of wars is being transformed by digital platforms. In this article, the authors empirically investigate and develop the novel approach to the study of witnessing, in particular the non-institutionalized form of inconspicuous digital witnessing which thrives in platform communities in the context of Russia’s war in Ukraine. By empirically examining communication practices on Telegram, a highly popular platform in Ukraine, the article explores the ways in which online platforms enable the rise of inconspicuous witnessing. Using a mixed-method approach, the authors trace the changes in digital witnessing practices in the beginning and during different periods of the Russian occupation, by investigating over 2,000 messages from a specific Telegram channel with over 150,000 users devoted to one occupied Ukrainian city. By identifying a number of changes in the analysed Telegram chat communication practices over time, they propose an empirically-grounded concept of the digitally witnessable war that acknowledges the critical polyvocality of contemporary war witnessing practices.
FordMHoskinsA (2022) Radical War: Data, Attention and Control in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
FroshPPinchevskiA (2009) Media Witnessing: Testimony in the Age of Mass Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
22.
GarciaMBCunanan-YabutA (2022) Public sentiment and emotion analyses of Twitter data on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. In: Proceedings of 2022 9th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 242–247.
23.
GaufmanE (2015) Memory, media, and securitization: Russian media framing of the Ukrainian crisis. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society1(1): 141–174.
24.
GoodmanNRMeyersMB (2012) The Power of Witnessing: Reflections, Reverberations, and Traces of the Holocaust. London: Routledge.
25.
GolovchenkoYHartmannMAdler-NissenR (2018) State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine: Citizen curators of digital disinformation. International Affairs94(5): 975–994.
26.
GuhlJDaveyJ (2020) Hosting the ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshot of Holocaust Denial across Social Media. London: The Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
27.
HenigLEbbrecht-HartmannT (2022) Witnessing Eva stories: Media witnessing and self-inscription in social media memory. New Media & Society24(1): 202–226.
28.
HoskinsA (2011) Media, memory, metaphor: Remembering and the connective turn. Parallax17(4): 19–31.
29.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2010) War and Media. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2015) Arrested war: The third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society18(11): 1320–1338.
31.
HoskinsAShchelinP (2023) The war feed: Digital war in plain sight. American Behavioral Scientist67(3): 449–463.
32.
KalpokasI (2019) Post-truth and the changing information environment. In: BainesP, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Propaganda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 71–84.
33.
KozachenkoI (2019) Fighting for the Soviet Union 2.0: Digital nostalgia and national belonging in the context of the Ukrainian crisis. Communist and Post-Communist Studies52(1): 1–10.
34.
KyriakidouM (2015) Media witnessing: Exploring the audience of distant suffering. Media, Culture & Society37(2): 215–231.
35.
MakhortykhMGonzález-AguilarJM (2023) Is it fine? Internet memes and hate speech on Telegram in relation to Russia’s war in Ukraine. In: Di FátimaB (ed.) Hate Speech on Social Media: A Global Approach. Covilhã: LabCom Books & EdiPUCE, 75–94.
36.
MakhortykhMLyebyedyevY (2015) #SaveDonbassPeople: Twitter, propaganda, and conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Communication Review18(4): 239–270.
37.
MakhortykhMSydorovaM (2017) Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict10(3): 359–381.
38.
NazarukT (2022) Subscribe and follow. Telegram and responsive archiving the war in Ukraine. Sociologica16(2): 217–226.
39.
NöthW (2003) Crisis of representation?Semiotica143: 9–15.
40.
O’ShaughnessyN (2019) From disinformation to fake news: Forwards into the past. In: BainesP, et al. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Propaganda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 55–70.
41.
PanttiM (2019) The personalisation of conflict reporting: Visual coverage of the Ukraine crisis on Twitter. Digital Journalism7(1): 124–145.
42.
PavlikJV (2022) The Russian war in Ukraine and the implications for the news media. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications8: 1–17.
43.
PomerantsevPWeissM (2014) The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money. New York, NY: The Institute of Modern Russia.
Pollin-GalayH (2018) Ecologies of Witnessing: Language, Place, and Holocaust Testimony. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
PötzschH (2015) The emergence of iWar: Changing practices and perceptions of military engagement in a digital era. New Media & Society17(1): 78–95.
47.
PtaszekGYuskivBKhomychS (2023) War on frames: Text mining of conflict in Russian and Ukrainian news agency coverage on Telegram during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Media, War & Conflict17(1): 41–61. DOI: 10.1177/175063522311663.
SchankweilerKStraubVWendlT (2018) Image Testimonies: Witnessing in Times of Social Media. London: Routledge.
51.
SchwarzeneggerCWagnerA (2023) Commemorative populism in the COVID-19 pandemic: The strategic (ab)use of memory in anti-corona protest communication on Telegram. International Journal of Communication17: 2138–2156.
52.
ShumylovychB, et al. (2022). Preserving the now! Mediating memories and archiving experiences in Ukraine. NECSUS11(2): 1–19.
53.
SopolovaV, et al. (2023) Automated multilingual detection of pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers and telegram posts. Datenbank Spektrum23: 5–14.
TsyrenzhapovaDWoolleySC (2021) The evolution of computational propaganda: Theories, debates, and innovation of the Russian model. In: TumberHWaisbordS (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. London: Routledge, 121–131.
56.
Turska-KawaAStępień-LampaN (2023) Conspiracy theory mobilisation mechanisms in the context of the war in Ukraine: A study of Polish Twitter. In: Turska-KawaA, et al. (eds.) War in Ukraine: Media and Emotions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 43–74.
57.
UrmanAMakhortykhM (2022) My war is your special operation: Engagement with pro-and anti-regime framing of the war in Ukraine on Russian social media. OSF. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/67snk.
58.
VanetikN, et al. (2023) Propaganda detection in Russian Telegram posts in the scope of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, ACL, Kerville, 1162–1170.
59.
WanlessABerkM (2019) The audience is the amplifier: Participatory propaganda. In: BainesP, et al. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Propaganda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 55–70.
60.
WoolleySC (2022) Digital propaganda: The power of influencers. Journal of Democracy33(3): 115–129.
61.
WuXMontgomeryM (2019) Witnessing in crisis contexts in the social media age: The case of the 2015 Tianjin blasts on Weibo. Media, Culture & Society42(5): 675–691.
