Antagonists’ images in the international news media can play a significant role in determining their level of political success in the international arena, which explains why so many political actors invest considerable resources in public diplomacy. The goal of the present study is to explain the level of success that various actors (countries and non-state actors) have in promoting their preferred frames about terror to the international news media. Four types of explanatory variables are proposed, divided into context and focal event factors. Context factors include the political values and policy proximity between the country attacked (the victimized country) and a country whose news media have been targeted for influence (the target country), as well as the target country’s experience in dealing with terror. Focal event factors refer to the nature of the trigger events that generate news coverage of terrorism. Apart from one exception (the policy proximity), all of the hypotheses were confirmed. The findings indicated that focal event factors have the most significant effect on the way foreign media covers conflicts and that, when it comes to coverage of terrorism, journalists are more interested in constructing a dramatic story than putting the events into a more general political context.
ArchettiC (2010) Terrorism, communication, and the war of ideas: Al-Qaida’s strategic narrative as a brand. Paper presented at the ICA, Singapore, June.
2.
BetzD (2008) The virtual dimension of contemporary insurgency and counterinsurgency. Small Wars & Insurgencies19(4): 510–540.
3.
DouglasS (2007) Waging the inchoate war: Defining, fighting, and second-guessing the ‘long war’. Journal of Strategic Studies30(3): 391–420.
4.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
5.
EntmanRM (1995) Television, democratic theory, and the visual construction of poverty. Research in Political Sociology7: 139–160.
6.
EntmanRM (2003) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
EntmanRM (2008) Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. Press/Politics13(2): 87–102.
8.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research2: 64–90.
9.
GamsonWA (1992) Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
11.
GanorB (1993) Defining terrorism. Ma’archot333: 25–27 (in Hebrew).
12.
GansHJ (1979). Deciding What’s News. New York: Random House.
13.
GilboaE (2000) Mass communication and diplomacy: A theoretical framework. Communication Theory10(3): 275–309.
14.
GitlinT (1980). The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
GoodwinCDurantiA (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In: GoodwinCDurantiA (eds) Rethinking Context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–42.
16.
HermannT (1995) Bottom-Up: Social Movements and Political Protest, Vol. 2. Tel-Aviv: The Open University of Israel (in Hebrew).
17.
HuntingtonSP (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18.
InglehartRWelzelC (2010) Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics8(2): 551–567.
19.
KunczikM (1997) Images of Nations and International Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
LiebesTFroshP (2006) Introduction. In: LiebesTFroshP (eds) Meeting the Enemy in the Living Room. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, 7–20.
21.
LiebesTKampfZ (2007) The PR of terror. In: AllanSZelizerB (eds) Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime. New York: Routledge, 77–95.
22.
MaloneG (1985) Managing public diplomacy. Washington Quarterly8: 199–213.
23.
ManheimJB (1994) Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
NyeJSJr (2003) U.S. power and strategy after Iraq. Foreign Affairs82(4): 60–73.
26.
NyeJSJr (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
27.
NyeJSJrOwensWA (1996) America’s information edge. Foreign Affairs75(2): 20–36.
28.
PearceD (1995) Wary Partners: Diplomats and the Media. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
29.
PetersonPG (2002) Public diplomacy and the war on terrorism. Foreign Affairs81(5): 74–94.
30.
RhoadsK (2009) The culture variable in the influence equation. In: SnowNTaylorPM (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, 166–186.
31.
RoehI (1989) Journalism as storytelling: Coverage as narrative. American Behavioral Scientist33(2): 162–168.
32.
RossC (2002). Public diplomacy comes to age. Washington Quarterly25(2): 75–83.
33.
SchmidAJongmanAJ (1988) Political Terrorism. Amsterdam: North–Holland Publishing.
34.
SheaferTGabayI (2009) Mediated public diplomacy: A strategic contest over international agenda building and frame building. Political Communication26(4): 447–467.
35.
SheaferTShenhavSR (2010) Mediated public diplomacy in a new era of warfare. Communication Review12: 272–283.
36.
SheaferTShenhavSRTakensJvan AtteveldtW (forthcoming). Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication.
37.
SnowNTaylorPM (2009) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge.
38.
Van EveraS (2006) Assessing U.S. strategy in the war on terror. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science607(1): 10–26.
39.
Van HamP (2001) The rise of the brand state. Foreign Affairs80(5): 2–6.
40.
VoetenE (2000) Clashes in the Assembly. International Organization54: 185–215.
41.
WangJ (2006) Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review32: 91–96.
42.
WeimannG (1985) Terrorists or freedom fighters? Labeling terrorism in the Israeli press. Political Communication and Persuasion2(4): 433–445.
43.
WeimannG (1999) The theater of terror. In Cohen-AlmagorR (ed.) Basic Issues in Israeli Democracy. Tel-Aviv: Hapoalim, 247–264 (in Hebrew).
44.
WeimannGWinnC (1994) The Theater of Terror. New York: Longman.
45.
WolfsfeldG (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WolfsfeldG (2004) Media and the Path to Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Routledge.
48.
YarchiMTsfatiY (2009) Coverage of terrorist attacks in the Israeli press: Center versus periphery. Megamot46(1): 38–61 (in Hebrew).
