This study employs crisis press coverage (CPC) to examine the uniform reporting assertion raised in communication theories. To explain CPC, the authors outline and apply a conceptual framework that links crises diversity and reporting modes. Findings on all short crises in the Arab–Israel and East–West conflicts from 1945 to 2006 show that despite differences in crisis attributes some coverage similarities remained intact, particularly the use of text at the expense of photos and similar issues in the news agenda. Yet, most CPC characteristics support a positive link between crises diversity and variety in press coverage, casting doubt on the single coverage hypothesis.
ArchettiC (2005) Constructivism and the media: Exploring meaning construction in the war on terrorism. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii.
2.
AwabdyMTWolfsfeldGFroshP (2008) Covering death in conflicts: Coverage of the Second Intifada on Israeli and Palestinian television. Journal of Peace Research45(3): 407–417.
3.
BennettLWPaletzD (1994) (eds) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Ben-YehudaHNavehCLevinL (2010) International newspapers beget violence? The MAC project & short crises, 1947–1996. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Theory vs. Policy? Connecting Scholars and Practitioners, New Orleans Hilton Riverside Hotel, The Loews New Orleans Hotel, New Orleans, LA.
5.
Ben-YehudaHSandlerS (2002) The Arab–Israeli Conflict Transformed: Fifty Years of Interstate and Ethnic-State Crises. Albany: State University of New York.
6.
Bloch-ElkonYLehman-WilzigS (2007) Media functioning during a violent international crisis: Differences between elite and popular press coverage of American policy in Bosnia (1992–1995). In: AnnabelleS. (eds) Media and Political Violence. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 119–142.
7.
BoazC (2005) War and peace in the media. Peace Review17(4): 335–339.
8.
BrecherMBen-YehudaH (1985) System and crisis in international politics. Review of International Studies11(1): 17–36.
9.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (1997) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (2010) International Crisis Behavior (ICB) Project. Available at: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/icb/ (accessed 3 September 2012).
11.
CarruthersSL (2000) The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CohenBC (1963) The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CottleSMugdhaR (2008) Global 24/7 news providers: Emissaries of global dominance or global public sphere?Global Media and Communication4(2): 157–181.
14.
DeprezARaeymaeckersK (2011) Bottlenecks in the coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: The coverage of the First and Second Intifada in the Flemish press. Media, War & Conflict4(2): 185–202.
15.
DruckmanJ (2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?Journal of Politics63(4): 1041–1066.
16.
EntmanR (1991) Framing US coverage of international news. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–27.
17.
EntmanR (2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57(1): 163–173.
18.
GaltungJRugeMH (1970) The structure of foreign news. In: TunstallJ (ed.) Media Sociology. London: Constable, 259–298.
19.
GarrisonJ (2007) Constructing the ‘national interest’ in U.S.–China policy making: How foreign policy decision groups define and signal policy choices. Foreign Policy Analysis3(2): 105–126.
20.
GilboaE (2005) Global television news and foreign policy: Debating the CNN effect. International Studies Perspectives6(3): 325–341.
21.
GilboaE (2008a) Media and conflict resolution. In: BercovitchJ. (eds) Sage Handbook on Conflict Resolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 457–476.
22.
GilboaE (2008b) Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science616(1): 55–77.
23.
GoertzGDiehlPF (1993) Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly37(2): 147–171.
24.
GriffinM (2004) Picturing America’s ‘war on terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic motifs as news frames. Journalism5(4): 381–402.
25.
GudelunasDParkDZelizerB (2002) How bias shapes the news: Challenging the New York Times’ status as a newspaper of record on the Middle East. Journalism3(3): 283–307.
26.
HallahanK (1999) Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research11(3): 205–242.
27.
HandleyRLIsmailA (2010) Territory under siege: ‘Their’ news, our’ news and ‘ours both’ news of the 2008 Gaza crisis. Media, War & Conflict3(3): 279–297.
28.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
29.
HayesDGuardinoM (2010) Whose views made the news? Media coverage and the march to war in Iraq. Political Communication27(1): 59–87.
30.
HermannCF (1969) International crisis as a situational variable. In: RosenauJN (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy. New York: The Free Press, 409–421.
31.
HöijerBNohrstedtSAOttosenR (2002) The Kosovo war in the media analysis of a global discursive order. Conflict & Communication Online1(2): 1–18.
32.
IyengarSSimonA (1994) News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion. In: BennettLPaletzD (eds) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 167–184.
33.
KalbMSaivetzC (2007) The Israeli–Hezbollah war of 2006: The media as a weapon in asymmetrical conflict. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(3): 43–66.
34.
KennedyL (2008) Securing vision: Photography and US foreign policy. Media Culture & Society30(3): 279–294.
35.
KiousisSWuX (2008) International agenda-building and agenda-setting: Exploring the influence of public relations counsel on US news media and public perceptions of foreign nations. International Communication Gazette70(1): 58–75.
36.
KolmerCSemetkoHA (2009) Framing the Iraq war perspectives from American, U.K., Czech, German, South African, and Al-Jazeera news. American Behavioral Scientist52(5): 643–656.
37.
KonstantinidouC (2008) The spectacle of suffering and death: The photographic representation of war in Greek newspapers. Visual Communication7(2): 143–169.
38.
LivingstonS (2011) The CNN effect reconsidered (again): Problematizing ICT and global governance in the CNN effect research agenda. Media, War & Conflict4(1): 20–36.
39.
LöffelholzM (2009) Communication on terrorism, war, disaster, and organizational crisis – searching for an integrative approach to crisis communication research. Conference on Crisis Communication at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Perspectives and Challenges for the Study of Communication in the Context of Terrorism, War, Disaster and Organizational Crisis, Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany. Available at: http://crisis2009.crisis-communication.de/ (accessed 3 September 2012).
40.
McCombsME (1981) The agenda setting approach. In: NimmoDDSandersKR (eds) Handbook of Political Communication. London: Sage, 121–140.
41.
McQuailD (1994) Mass Communication Theory, 3rd edn.London: Sage.
42.
McQuailD (2007) The influence and effects of mass media. In: GraberDA (ed.) Media Power in Politics, 5th edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press, 19–36.
43.
MaozZMorBD (1996) Enduring rivalries: The early years. International Political Science Review17(2): 141–160.
44.
NavehC (2002) The role of the media in foreign policy decision making: A theoretical framework. Conflict & Communication Online1(2): 1–14.
45.
NorrisPMarionJKernM (2003) Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. London: Taylor & Francis.
46.
NossekH (2004) Our news and their news: The role of national identity in the coverage of foreign news. Journalism5(4): 343–368.
47.
NossekHBerkowitzD (2006) Telling ‘our’ story through news of terrorism: Mythical newswork as journalistic practice in crisis. Journalism Studies7(5): 691–707.
48.
OttosenR (2010) The war in Afghanistan and peace journalism in practice. Media, War & Conflict3(3): 261–278.
49.
PerlmutterD (2005) Photojournalism and foreign affairs. Orbis49(1): 109–122.
50.
PerlmutterDWagnerGL (2004) The anatomy of a photojournalistic icon: Marginalization of dissent in the selection and framing of ‘A Death in Genoa’. Visual Communication3(1): 91–108.
51.
RobinsonP (2005) The CNN effect revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication22(4): 344–349.
52.
RobinsonP (2011) The CNN effect reconsidered: Mapping a research agenda for the future. Media, War & Conflict4(1): 3–11.
53.
RoehINirR (1993) Reporting the Intifada in the Israeli press. In CohenAWolfsfeldG (eds) Framing the Intifada: People and Media. Norwood: Ablex, 92–118.
54.
RogersEMDearingJW (2007) Agenda setting research: Where has it been? Where is it going? In: GraberDA (ed.) Media Power in Politics, 5th edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press, 80–97.
55.
ScheufeleD (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
56.
ScheufeleDTewksburyD (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication57(1): 9–20.
57.
SeibP (2008) The Al Jazeera Effect: How the New Global Media Are Reshaping World Politics. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
58.
ShinarD (2009) Can peace journalism make progress? The coverage of the 2006 Lebanon war in Canadian and Israeli media. The International Communication Gazette71(6): 451–471.
59.
ShinarDKempfW (2007) (eds) Peace Journalism: The State of the Art. Berlin: Irena Regener.
60.
SorokaSN (2003) Media, public opinion, and foreign policy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(1): 27–48.
61.
TaylorPM (1998) War and the Media: Propaganda and Persuasion in the Gulf War, 2nd edn.Manchester: Manchester University Press.
62.
TaylorPMMoorcraftP (2008) Shooting the Messenger: The Political Impact of War Reporting. Sterling, VA: Potomac Press.
63.
WeaverDH (2007) Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication57(1): 142–147.
64.
WeaverDHMcCombsMShawDL (2004) Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In: KaidL (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 257–282.
65.
WesterstahlJJohanssonF (1994) Foreign news: News values and ideologies. European Journal of Communication9(1): 71–89.
66.
WolfsfeldG (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
WolfsfeldG (2004) Media and the Path to Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Rutledge.
69.
ZelizerB (2005) Death in wartime: Photographs and the ‘other war’ in Afghanistan. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10(3): 26–55.
