Resisting anti-democratic values with misogynistic abuse against a Chilean right-wing politician on Twitter: The #CamilaPeluche incident

Abstract

This paper explores abuse received by a Chilean right-wing female politician in tweets produced with the #CamilaPeluche hashtag, which aimed to shame her sexually. The data considers the period of 22 days since the creation and spread of the hashtag, which took place 5 days into the 2019 uprising in Chile. This paper follows a corpus-based critical discourse analysis that examines the most frequently used adjectives, that is, predication strategies, that characterise the politician, as well as their (de)legitimating function through the identification of van Leeuwen’s legitimation strategies. Results showed that what started as gendered aggression evolved towards a focus on social class and political stance due to the politician’s characteristics and those of the sociohistorical context where the aggressions originated. Furthermore, it was found that the politician’s anti-democratic values were used to justify abuse against her, presenting it as reasonable.

Keywords

Chile Critical Discourse Studies corpus-based methods legitimation online misogyny predication strategies social media Twitter women in politics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvares

(2018) Online staging of femininity: Disciplining through public exposure in Brazilian social media. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 657–674.

Angel

(2021) Tomorrow Sex Will Be Good Again. London: Verso.

Anthony

(2019) AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/ (accessed 20 February 2020).

Arévalo

(2019) El día que Elizabeth Ogaz se hizo la vístima. Available at: https://www.lacuarta.com/cronica/noticia/dia-elizabeth-ogaz-se-hizola-vistima/437771/ (accessed 18 November 2021).

Aste Leiva

(2020) Estallido social en Chile: la persistencia de la Constitución neoliberal como problema. DPCE Online 42(1): 3–19.

Atalanta (2018) (Anti)social media: The benefits and pitfalls of digital for female politicians. Available at: https://www.atalanta.co/antisocial-media (accessed 18 November 2021).

Baker

Ellece

(2010) Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Baker

Gabrielatos

KhosraviNik

, et al. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306.

Baumeister

Vohs

(2004) Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4): 339–363.

10.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp.241–258.

11.

Bruns

(2008) Reconfiguring television for a networked, produsage context. Media International Australia 126(1): 82–94.

12.

Caldas-Coulthard

(1995) Man in the news: The misrepresentation of women speaking in news-as-narrative-discourse. In: Mills

(ed.) Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Longman, pp.226–238.

13.

Dorostkar

Preisinger

(2017) ‘Cyber hate’ vs. ‘cyber deliberation’: The case of an Austrian newspaper’s discussion board from a critical online-discourse analytical perspective. Journal of Language and Politics 16(6): 759–781.

14.

Esposito

(2021) Introduction: Critical perspectives on gender, politics and violence. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 1–20.

15.

Esposito

Zollo

(2021) “How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew”: A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 47–75.

16.

Evans

(1997) Political ideology and popular beliefs about class and opportunity: Evidence from a survey experiment. British Journal of Sociology 48(3): 450–470.

17.

Fairclough

(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.

18.

Fauvel

(2014) Crazy brains and the weaker sex: The British case (1860–1900). Clio 37 [Online]. 2013, Online since 15 April 2014. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/cliowgh/352

19.

Franklin

(2019) ‘They smashed me in the head’: anger at Piñera as Chile’s bloodied protesters allege brutality. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/22/santiago-protesters-pinera-chile (accessed 8 November 2021).

20.

Fuchs

(2014) Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society 23(1): 97–123.

21.

Gálvez Comandini

(2021) Históricas: movimientos feministas y de mujeres en Chile, 1850-2020. Santiago: Lom Ediciones.

22.

Hardaker

McGlashan

(2016) “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics 91: 80–93.

23.

Hardt-Mautner

(1995) Only connect. Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL Technical Paper 6, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

24.

Harp

(2018) Misogyny in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. In: Vickery

Everbach

(eds) Mediating Misogyny. Gender, Technology and Harassment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.189–207.

25.

Hopenhayn

(2021) Kathya Araujo: “La política volvió al electoralismo y no tenemos ningún proyecto para el futuro.” Available at: https://www.latercera.com/la-tercera-domingo/noticia/katya-araujo-la-politica-volvio-al-electoralismo-y-no-tenemos-ningun-proyecto-para-el-futuro/6JTV5GDAEVD7PHOUZR5RVCQTRI/ (accessed 10 February 2021).

26.

Jane

(2014) Your a ugly, whorish, slut – Understanding E-bile. Feminist Media Studies 14(4): 531–546.

27.

Juliano

(2017) Tomar la palabra: mujeres, discursos y silencios. Barcelona: Ediciones Bellatera.

28.

KhosraviNik

Unger

(2016) Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: SAGE Publications, pp.205–233.

29.

Kopytowska

(2021) Xenophobia, misogyny and rape culture: Targeting women in cyberspace. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 76–99.

30.

Krishnamurthy

(1996) Ethnic, racial and tribal: The language of racism? In: Caldas-Coulthard

Coulthard

(eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp.129–149.

31.

Krook

(2020) Violence Against Women in Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

32.

Langton

(2008) Sexual Solipsism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Lott

(2002) Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist 57(2): 100–110.

34.

Lumsden

Morgan

(2017) Media framing of trolling and online abuse: Silencing strategies, symbolic violence, and victim blaming. Feminist Media Studies 17(6): 926–940.

35.

Luna

Monestier

Rosenblatt

(2013) Religious parties in Chile: The Christian Democratic Party and the Independent Democratic Union. Democratization 20(5): 917–938.

36.

Mantilla

(2013) Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies 39(2): 563–570.

37.

Mautner

(2016) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics Can contribute to CDA. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publications, pp.154–179.

38.

Medina

(2019) Diputadas Paulina Núñez y Camila Flores rompen carteles alusivos a víctimas del Estado de Emergencia. Available at: https://redgol.cl/tiempolibre/Diputadas-Paulina-Nunez-y-Camila-Flores-rompen-imagenes-de-personas-fallecidas-durante-el-Estado-de-Emergencia-20191023-0024.html (accessed 3 October 2021).

39.

Moloney

Love

(2018) Assessing online misogyny: Perspectives from sociology and feminist media studies. Sociology Compass 12(5): e12577.

40.

Nussbaum

(2010) Objectification and Internet misogyny. In: Levmore

Nussbaum

(eds) The Offensive Internet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.68–87.

41.

Page

Barton

Unger

, et al. (2014) Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.

42.

Pérez-Arredondo

Graells-Garrido

(2021) Twitter and abortion: Online hate against pro-choice female politicians in Chile. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 127–154.

43.

PNUD (2017) Desiguales. Orígenes, Cambios y Desafíos de la Brecha Social en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.

44.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2016) The discourse-historical Approach (DHA). In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publications, pp.23–61.

45.

Rodríguez Weber

(2017) The political economy of income inequality in Chile since 1850. In: Bértola

Williamson

(eds) Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction? Cham: Springer, pp.43–64.

46.

Roniger

Sznajder

(1999) The Legacy of Human Rights Violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

47.

Sanyal

(2019) Rape: From Lucretia to #metoo. London: Verso.

48.

Somma

Bargsted

Disi Pavlic

, et al. (2021) No water in the oasis: The Chilean spring of 2019–2020. Social Movement Studies 20(4): 495–502.

49.

Stubbs

(1996) Texts and Corpus Analysis. London: Blackwell.

50.

Stubbs

(1997) Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In: Ryan

Wray

(eds) Evolving Models of Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp.110–116.

51.

Tasca

Rapetti

Carta

, et al. (2012) Women and hysteria in the history of mental health. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 8(1): 110–119.

52.

Tolman

(2002) Dilemmas of Desire: Teenage Girls Talk About Sexuality. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.

53.

van Dijk

(1995) Power in the news media. In: Paletz

(ed.) Political Communication and Action. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp.9–36.

54.

van Dijk

(2013) ‘CDA is NOT a method of critical discourse analysis’ [Website Article]. EDISO Debate - Asociación de Estudios sobre Discurso y Sociedad. Available at: http://www.edisoportal.org/debate/115-cda-not-method-critical-discourse-analysis (accessed 15 February 2021).

55.

van Leeuwen

(2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

56.

Vickery

Everbach

(2018) Mediating Misogyny. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

57.

Volk

(1999) Pinochet’s heirs: The fractured Chilean right. NACLA Report on the Americas 32(6): 21–30.

58.

Widdowson

(2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

59.

Wilson

(2018) Camila Flores “Bolsonaro piensa lo mismo que yo y muchos chilenos.” Available at: http://impresa.lasegunda.com/2018/10/12/A/U23FPKBL (accessed 2 October 2021).

60.

Wolf

(2002) The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

61.

Zappavigna

(2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.