Extremism has been a problematic term to define and suggests different and opposing meanings. This study explores how Twitter users conceptualize extremism in Arabic and express their opinions/arguments to construct the term. A corpus of tweets was collected from Twitter API using the word ‘تطرف أو متطرف’ in Arabic for extremist/extremism. A topic modeling algorithm was then applied to the dataset to uncover latent associated concepts underlying extremism, followed by a critical discourse analysis using Van Dijk’s Sociocognitive approach. The discursive and linguistic strategies used by Twitter users to support and justify their views of extremism were examined. The findings demonstrate an ideological influence that controls the concept of extremism, keeping it open to manipulation to serve shared interests and goals. Arab users of Twitter use extremism to promote their groups’ positive schema against others-negative schema.
AbainiaKOuamourSSayoudH (2017) A novel robust Arabic light stemmer. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence29(3): 557–573.
2.
AbdelaliADarwishKDurraniN, et al. (2016) Farasa: A fast and furious segmenter for Arabic. In: Proceedings of the 2016 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Demonstrations, San Diego, CA, 16 June, pp.11–16.
3.
AbdullahAMuhammadZ (2020) al djuthuur al Tariekhiya le Attataruf: Asbabuh wa Atharuh wa Eladjuh. Journal of Historical & Cultural Studies: An Academic Magazine12(2, Part 2): 249–264.
4.
AhmadMHussainS (2020) Attataruf wa al Ghulluu-Asbabuh wa Atharuh wa Eladjuh: Dirasah Tahlleliyah min al Quraan al Kareem wa Assunnah Annabawiyah al Mutaharrah. Journal of Historical & Cultural Studies: An Academic Magazine12(2, Part 2): 34–62.
5.
AlavaSFrau-MeigsDHassanG (2017) Youth and Violent Extremism on Social Media: Mapping the Research. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
6.
AlkhawadjaM (2007) Tagdeed al khitab al Deeni fi Itar al Mashhad al Tariekhi wa Muwadjahat al Aakhar al Gharbi. Cairo: New Book.
7.
AlmubarakR (2006) Attataruf: Khubz Aalamy. Damascus: Dar Alqalam.
8.
AlonsoRBjorgoTDella PortaD, et al. (2008) Radicalisation processes leading to acts of terrorism. A concise report prepared by the European Commission’s Expert Group on violent radicalisation. Available at: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/446365/file/6814706 (accessed 14 December 2019).
BayumiM (1999) Dhahirat Att taruf, Al Asbab wa Al Elaj. Alexandria: Dar Al Maa’refa Al jameiyah.
11.
BenigniMCJosephKCarleyKM (2017) Online extremism and the communities that sustain it: Detecting the ISIS supporting community on Twitter. PLoS One12(12): e0181405.
12.
BergerJMMorganJ (2015) The ISIS Twitter census: Defining and describing the population of ISIS supporters on Twitter. The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World3(20): 4–1.
13.
BhattacharjeeSDBalantrapuBVToloneW, et al. (2017) Identifying extremism in social media with multi-view context-aware subset optimization. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on big data (big data), Boston, MA, 11–14December, pp.3638–3647.
14.
BirdSLoperEKleinE (2009) Natural Language Processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
15.
BrindleA (2009) Just keep your pants on and in the closet and you’ll be fine. In: The corpus analysis of a white supremacist web forum. Presentation given at the Corpus Research Seminar, Lancaster University.
16.
Caldas-CoulthardCRMoonR (2010) “Curvy, hunky, kinky”: Using corpora as tools for critical analysis. Discourse & Society21(2): 99–133.
17.
ChatfieldATReddickCGBrajawidagdaU (2015) Tweeting propaganda, radicalization and recruitment: Islamic state supporters multi-sided twitter networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on digital government research, Phoenix, AR, May 2015, pp.239–249.
18.
ChouliarakiLFaircloughN (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
FaircloughN (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
22.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van DijkTA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, pp.258–284.
23.
GeeJP (2004) Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In: RogersR (ed.) An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. London: Routledge, pp.49–80.
JavaASongXFininT, et al. (2007) Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on web mining and social network analysis, San Jose, CA, August 2007, pp.56–65. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
26.
JofféEGH (2013) Islamist Radicalisation in Europe and the Middle East: Reassessing the Causes of Terrorism, vol. 51. London: I.B. Tauris.
27.
John CollinsDCollinsJGloverR (2002) Collateral Language: A User’s Guide to America’s New War. New York, NY: New York University Press.
28.
LeeDDSeungHS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature401(6755): 788–791.
29.
MohrJWBogdanovP (2013) Introduction—Topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics41(6): 545–569.
30.
MooreJ (2011) Social media: Did Twitter and Facebook really build a global revolution. The Christian Science Monitor, 30June.
31.
MurthyD (2018) Twitter. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
NaggarF (2003) al Mua’djam al Mawsoa’y le Mustalahat a Tarbia. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnan Nasharuun.
PartingtonA (2003) The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House. London: Routledge.
35.
PedregosaFVaroquauxGGramfortA, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research12: 2825–2830.
36.
PisoiuD (2012) Islamist Radicalisation in Europe: An Occupational Change Process. Abingdon: Routledge.
37.
PrenticeSRaysonPTaylorPJ (2012) The language of Islamic extremism: Towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(2): 259–286.
38.
ReisiglMWodakR (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
39.
RobertsMEStewartBMTingleyD, et al. (2014) Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 1064–1082.
40.
SarkarD (2016) Text Analytics with Python: A Practical Real-Word to Gaining Actionable Insights From Your Data. New York, NY: Apress.
41.
SchmidAP (2014) Violent and Non-violent Extremism: Two Sides of the Same Coin. The Hague: ICCT.
42.
ShahataHAnnaggarZ (2003) Mua’djam al Mustalahat a Tarbawia wa A Nafsia. Cairo: a Dar al Misria al Lubnania.
43.
SmithA (2007) Words make worlds: Terrorism and language. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin76(12): 12–18.
44.
SmithBKStohlMAl-GharbiM (2019) Discourses on countering violent extremism: The strategic interplay between fear and security after 9/11. Critical Studies on Terrorism12(1): 151–168.
SurekaAAgarwalS (2014) Learning to classify hate and extremism promoting tweets. In: 2014 IEEE joint intelligence and security informatics conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 24–26 September 2014, pp.320–320.
TörnbergATörnbergP (2016a) Combining CDA and topic modeling: Analyzing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum. Discourse & Society27(4): 401–422.
50.
TörnbergATörnbergP (2016b) Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. Discourse Context & Media13: 132–142.
VaaraEArandaAMEtchanchuH, et al. (2019) From big data to rich theory: Combining structural topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY, p.16640. New York, NY: Academy of Management.
53.
Van DijkTA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283.
54.
Van DijkTA (1995a) Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In: SchäffnerCWendenA (eds) Language and Pace. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, pp.17–33.
55.
Van DijkTA (1995b) Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society6(2): 243–289.
56.
Van DijkTA (2011) Discourse and ideology. In: Van DijkTA (ed.) (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp.379–407.
57.
Van DijkTA (2014) Discourse-cognition-society: Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse. In: HartCCapP (eds) Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury, pp.121–146.
58.
Van DijkTA (2015) Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd edn.London: SAGE, pp.62–85.
59.
Van DijkTA (2016) Sociocognitive discourse studies. In: The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, pp.26–43.
60.
WarfB (2011) Myths, realities, and lessons of the Arab Spring. The Arab World Geographer14(2): 166–168.
61.
WeiYSinghLMartinS (2016) Identification of extremism on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, August, pp.1251–1255. New York, NY: IEEE Press.
62.
WodakR (2001) The discourse-historical approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis1: 63–94.
63.
YardiSBoydD (2010) Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society30(5): 316–327.
64.
ZakeerJ (2016) Al Muttatarifun: Nashaa’t Attataruf al Fikri wa Asbabuh wa Atharuh wa Turuq Eladjuh Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Egypt: Al nukhba Press.
