The purpose of this paper is to compare disagreement in two different WhatsApp groups: one for members of the same family, and another for work colleagues. After the analysis, 427 instances of disagreement were identified in the family group, and 161 in the interactions between work colleagues. The most common strategy in both corpora is ‘Giving opposite opinions’. Nevertheless, the rest of the results present very significant dissimilarities, most notably the higher presence of disagreement in the family WhatsApp group. This higher tolerance for disagreement is corroborated by the choice of linguistic strategies made. Whereas the family members tended to give emotional or personal reasons for disagreement, as well as negative comments on the topic, the colleagues preferred to express their disagreement with mitigating expressions and token agreement. Thus, in the corpora studied, the expression of disagreement seems to be less face threatening for family members than for work colleagues.
AhadADAriff LimSM (2014) Convenience or nuisance?: The ‘WhatsApp’ dilemma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences155: 189–196.
2.
Andújar-VacaACruz-MartínezMS (2017) Mobile instant messaging: Whatsapp and its potential to develop oral skills. Comunicar25(50): 43–52.
3.
AngouriJLocherMA (2012) Theorising disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics44(12): 1549–1553.
4.
AngouriJTseligaT (2010) ‘You have no idea what you are talking about!’ From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research6: 57–82.
5.
AullB (2019) A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication. Internet Pragmatics2(2): 206–232.
6.
BarhoumiC (2015) The effectiveness of WhatsApp mobile learning activities guided by activity theory on students’ knowledge management. Contemporary Educational Technology6(3): 221–238.
7.
BaronNS (2008) Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bertomeu PiP (2020) Acuerdo, desacuerdo y resistencia epistémica en intervenciones reactives en español y alemán. Tonos Digital39: 1–27.
9.
Bou-FranchPGarcés-Conejos BlitvichP (2014) Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36.
10.
BouhnikDDeshenM (2014) WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research13: 217–231.
11.
BourlaiEHerringSC (2014) Multimodal communication on Tumblr: ‘I have so many feels!’ In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science, Bloomington, IN, pp.171–175.
12.
Brenes PeñaE (2011) Actos de habla disentivos. Identificación y análisis. Sevilla: Ediciones Alfar.
13.
BrownPLevinsonSC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Calero VaqueraML (2014) El discurso del WhatsApp: Entre el Messenger y el SMS. Oralia17: 85–114.
15.
ChurchKDe OliveiraR (2013) What’s up with Whatsapp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp.352–361. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
16.
Cruz-MoyaOSánchez-MoyaA (2021) Humour in multimodal times. Insights from online interactions among senior users of a WhatsApp group. Internet Pragmatics4(1): 52–86.
17.
CrystalD (2006) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DresnerEHerringSC (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20(3): 249–268.
19.
DresnerEHerringSC (2013) Emoticons and illocutionary force. In: RiesenfeldDScarafilG (eds) Perspectives on Theory of Controversies and the Ethics of Communication. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.81–90.
20.
ErsözS (2019) Understanding Whatsapp parent groups’ dynamics: Group communication and information sharing. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi8(1): 1167–1183.
21.
Fernández-AmayaL (2019) Disagreement and (im)politeness in a Spanish family members’ WhatsApp group. Russian Journal of Linguistics23(4): 1065–1087.
22.
Fernández-AmayaL (2020) Managing conflict originated by feminism. A case study from WhatsApp interaction among Spanish family members. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict8(1): 88–117.
23.
Fernández-AmayaLHernández-LópezMGarcés-Conejos BlitvichP (2014) Spanish travellers’ expectations of service encounters in domestic and international settings. Tourism, Culture and Communication14(2): 117–134.
24.
Flores-SalgadoECastineira-BenitezTA (2018) The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move ‘requests’. Journal of Pragmatics133: 79–92.
25.
GanasegeranKRenganathanPRashidA, et al. (2017) The m-Health revolution: Exploring perceived benefits of WhatsApp use in clinical practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics97: 145–151.
26.
Garcés-Conejos BlitvichP (2010) A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics2: 46–94.
27.
García-GómezA (2018) Managing conflict on WhatsApp: A contrastive study of British and Spanish family disputes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict6(2): 318–340.
28.
GeorgakopoulouA (2001) Arguing about the future: on indirect disagreements in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics33: 1881–1900.
29.
Hernández-LópezM (2016) Disagreement and degrees of assertiveness in service encounters: Purchase vs problem-solving interactions. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language4(2): 87–104.
30.
Hernández-LópezMFernández-AmayaL (2019) What makes (im)politeness for travellers? Spanish tourists’ perceptions at national and international hotels. Journal of Politeness Research15(2): 195–222.
31.
HerringSC (2015) New frontiers in interactive multimodal communication. In: GeorgopoulouASpillotiT (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. London: Routledge, pp.398–402.
32.
JewittC (2013) Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In: PriceSJewittCBrownB (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research. London: SAGE, pp.250–265.
33.
JoelssonL (2012) ¿Cómo se expresa el desacuerdo en la conversación coloquial? Un estudio comparativo de conversaciones coloquiales entre jóvenes suecos y españoles. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
34.
JohnstonMKingDAroraS, et al. (2015) Smartphones let surgeons know Whatsapp: An analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. American Journal of Surgery209(1): 45–51.
35.
JonesRHHafnerCA (2012) Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.
36.
KakaváC (1993) Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
37.
KakaváC (2002) Opposition in modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints. Journal of Pragmatics34(10): 1537–1568.
38.
Kamel BoulosMGiustiniDWheelerS (2016) Instagram and WhatsApp in health and healthcare: An overview. Future Internet8(3): 37.
39.
KreutelK (2007) “I’m Not Agree with You.” ESL Learners’ expressions of disagreement. TESL-EJ11(3): 1–20.
40.
LocherMA (2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
41.
Maíz ArévaloC (2018) Emotional self-presentation on Whatsapp: Analysis of the profile status. Russian Journal of Linguistics22(1): 144–160.
42.
MalamedLH (2010) How to disagree agreeably. In: Martínez-FlorAUsó-JuanE (eds) Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.199–216.
43.
Moreno BenítezD (2019) Un nuevo operador del desacuerdo: ¿hola? In: González SanzMPérez BéjarV (eds) ELUA: Macrosintaxis en construcción, Anexo VI, pp.157–172.
44.
MuraGA (2012) La fraseología del desacuerdo: los esquemas fraseológicos en español y en italiano. PhD Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
45.
O’HaraKMassimiMHarperR, et al. (2014) Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Baltimore, MD, pp.1131–1143.
46.
Pérez-SabaterC (2013) The linguistics of social networking: A study of writing conventions on Facebook. Linguistik Online56(6): 81–93.
47.
Pérez-SabaterC (2015) Discovering language variation in Whatsapp text interactions. Onomázein: Revista Semestral de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción31(1): 113–126.
48.
PetitjeanCMorelE (2017) ‘Hahaha’: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics110: 1–19.
49.
PomerantzA (1984) Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shaped. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Rees-MillerJ (2000) Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics32(8): 1087–1111.
51.
Rubio-RomeroJPerlado de EspinosaM (2015) El fenómeno WhatsApp en el contexto de la comunicación personal: Una aproximación a través de los jóvenes universitarios. Revista ICONO14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes13(2): 73–94.
52.
SacksH (1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequence in conversation. Talk and Social Organization54: 54–69.
53.
SampietroA (2016a) Emoticonos y multimodalidad. El uso del pulgar hacia arriba en WhatsApp. Aposta. Revista de Ciencias Sociales69: 271–295.
54.
SampietroA (2016b) Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats. Lenguas Modernas47: 91–113.
55.
Sánchez-MoyaACruz-MoyaO (2015a) Whatsapp, textese, and moral panics: Discourse features and habits across two generations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences173: 300–306.
56.
Sánchez-MoyaACruz-MoyaO (2015b) ‘Hey there! I am using Whatsapp’: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of Whatsapp statuses.”Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences212: 52–60.
57.
Santamaría GarcíaC (2003) La negociación de acuerdo en la conversación coloquial. Estudio contrastivo español-inglés. PhD Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
58.
SchiffrinD (1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society13: 311–335.
59.
ShumWLeeC (2013) (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics50: 52–83.
60.
SifianouM (2012) Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics44: 1554–1564.
61.
SwalesJ (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TannenD (1984) Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
TannenD (1990) You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, NY: Ballantine.
64.
YusF (2005) Attitudes and emotions through written text: the case of textual deformation in Internet chat. Pragmalingüística13: 147–173.
65.
YusF (2011) Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
66.
YusF (2014) Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso14(3): 511–529.
67.
YusF (2017) Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in Whatsapp communication. Journal of Pragmatics114: 66–86.
68.
ZhuW (2014) Managing relationships in everyday practice: The case of strong disagreement in mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics64: 85–87.
