Decision-making is an integral part of business meetings in an organization. Research has suggested that a participant’s engagement in the decision-making process has direct relevance to his or her role(s) in the team or organization. This study extends the investigation of communicative behavior in decision-making to a special meeting setting where all participants assume similar organizational roles and where there is no designated chair. In particular, it draws on conversation analytic methods and a recently developed framework of participant roles to examine discursive strategies and discourse roles on a moment-by-moment basis in the process of consensus negotiation. Findings show that participants’ choices of discursive strategies and the display of discourse roles vary as the discussion proceeds. A limited range of discursive strategies and discourse roles are identified when the discussion fails to lead to consensus. Our analysis also suggests that certain discourse roles appear to have a greater impact on reaching consensus decisions.
AngouriJMarraM (2010) Corporate meetings as genre: A study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk. Text & Talk30(6): 615–636.
2.
AsmussBOshimaS (2012) Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies14(1): 67–86.
3.
AsmussBSvennevigJ (2009) Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication46(1): 3–22.
4.
BaileyS (2011) Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 3rd edn.London: Routledge.
5.
BaraldiC (2013) Forms of decision making: Gatekeeping and dialogic coordination in CISV organizational meetings. Journal of Business Communication50(4): 339–361.
6.
BaxerJ (2015) Who wants to be the leader? The linguistic construction of emerging leadership in differently gendered teams. International Journal of Business Communication52(4): 427–451.
7.
BezemerPJNicholsonGPuglieseA (2014) Inside the boardroom: Exploring board member interactions. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management11(3): 238–259.
8.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
ChoiSSchnurrS (2014) Exploring distributed leadership: Solving disagreements and negotiating consensus in a ‘leaderless’ team. Discourse Studies16(1): 3–24.
10.
CliftR (2016) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CliftonJ (2006) A conversation analytical approach to business communication: The case of leadership. Journal of Business Communication43(3): 202–219.
12.
CliftonJ (2015) Leaders as ventriloquists. Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organisation. Leadership13: 301–319.
13.
CulpeperJCrawshawRHarrisonJ (2008) ‘Activity types’ and ‘discourse types’: Mediating ‘advice’ in interactions between foreign language assistants and their supervisors in schools in France and England. Multilingua27(4): 297–324.
14.
Du-BabcockB (1999) Topic management and turn-taking in professional communication: First versus second-language strategies. Management Communication Quarterly12: 544–574.
15.
Du-BabcockB (2013) English as business lingua franca: A comparative analysis of communication behavior and strategies in Asian and European contexts. Ibérica26: 99–130.
16.
GuffeyMEDu-BabcockB (2010) Essentials of Business Communication, 2nd edn.Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.
17.
HalvorsenKSarangiS (2015) Team decision-making in workplace meetings: The interplay of activity roles and discourse roles. Journal of Pragmatics76: 1–14.
18.
HolmesJMarraM (2004) Leadership and managing conflict in meetings. Pragmatics14(4): 439–462.
19.
HolmesJStubbeM (2015) Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
20.
HuismanM (2001) Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management & Organization31(3): 69–90.
21.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.
22.
KangasharjuH (2002) Alignment in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1447–1471.
KotthoffH (1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society22(2): 193–216.
25.
LernerGH (1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In: OchsESchegloffEAThompsonSA (eds) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–276.
26.
McCarthyMHandfordM (2004) Invisible to us: A preliminary corpus-based study of spoken business English. In: ConnorUUptonT (eds) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 167–201.
27.
PlankenB (2005) Managing rapport in lingua franca sales negotiations: A comparison of professional and aspiring negotiators. English for Specific Purposes24(4): 381–400.
28.
PomerantzA (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
29.
PomerantzADenvirP (2007) Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority. In: CoorenF (ed.) Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 31–52.
SacksH (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: ButtonG and Lee JRE (eds) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54–69.
32.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
33.
SarangiS (2000) Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In: SarangiSCoulthardM (eds) Discourse and Social Life. Harlow: Longman, pp. 1–27.
34.
SarangiS (2010) Reconfiguring self/identity/status/role: The case of professional role performance in healthcare encounters. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(1): 75–95.
35.
SarangiSCoulthardM (2000) Discourse as topic, resource and social practice: An introduction. In: SarangiSCoulthardM (eds) Discourse and Social Life. Harlow: Longman, pp. xv–xli.
36.
SchnurrSChanA (2011) Exploring ‘another side’ of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreements. Language in Society40(2): 187–209.
37.
StevanovicM (2012) Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies14(6): 779–803.
38.
SvennevigJ (2011) Leadership style in managers’ feedback in meetings. In: AngouriJMarraM (eds) Constructing Identities at Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–39.
39.
UlijnJ (2000) Innovation and international business communication: Can European research help to increase the validity and reliability for our business and teaching practice? 1999 outstanding researcher lecture. Journal of Business Communication37(2): 173–187.
40.
WassonC (2000) Caution and consensus in American business meetings. Pragmatics10(4): 457–482.
41.
WassonC (2016) Integrating conversation analysis and issue framing to illuminate collaborative decision-making activities. Discourse & Communication10(4): 378–411.
42.
WillingK (1992) Problem-solving discourse in professional work. Prospect7(2): 57–65.
