The benefits of narratology in the analysis of multimodal legitimation: The case of New Democracy

Abstract

Previous studies on legitimation, multimodality and political discourse by researchers, such as Van Leeuwen, Van Dijk and Mackay, have suggested different but supplementary methods of legitimation analysis by providing a number of analytical frameworks. Multimodal legitimation research, however, seems to be in need of a better conflation of the theoretical backgrounds of disciplines, such as narratology. This article focuses on the multimodal discourse of three political advertisements of the political party New Democracy, filmed for the needs of the Greek legislative election of January 2015. What is investigated is the multimodal means by which New Democracy’s president, and Prime Minister at the time, Antonis Samaras attempted to legitimise his candidacy. In this article, I use the six-layer framework proposed by Mackay for multimodal legitimation analyses and I argue that multimodal legitimation research can benefit and get enhanced from the use of narratology and its analytical categories, such as perspective.

Keywords

Antonis Samaras critical discourse studies electoral discourses Greece Greek crisis January 2015 legislative election legitimation multimodality narratology New Democracy perspective political advertising

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasiades

(1993) Σύγχρονη Πολιτική Ιστορία της Ελλάδος (1974–1992) [Contemporary political history of Greece (1974–1992)]. Athens: Malliaris Paideia.

Angouri

Wodak

(2014) ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–565.

Boukala

(2014) Waiting for democracy: Political crisis and the discursive (re)invention of the ‘national enemy’ in times of ‘Grecovery’. Discourse & Society 25(4): 483–499.

Boukala

Dimitrakopoulou

(2016) The politics of fear vs. the politics of hope: analysing the 2015 Greek election and referendum campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies 14: 39–55.

Chouliaraki

(2005) The soft power of war: Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses. Special Issue of Journal of Language and Politics 4(1): 1–10.

Day

(1999) Advertising: Information or Manipulation? Springfield, NJ: Enslow.

Genette

(1972) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Oxford: Blackwell.

Georgakopoulou

(2014) Small stories transposition and social media: A micro-perspective on the ‘Greek crisis’. Discourse & Society 25(4): 519–539.

Heldman

(2009) Campaign advertising and American democracy. By Michael M. Franz, Paul B. Freedman, Kenneth M. Goldstein, and Travis N. Ridout. (Temple University Press, 2007). The Journal of Politics 71(2): 760–761.

10.

Iyengar

McGrady

(2006) Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide. Stanford, CA: W.W. Norton.

11.

Jewitt

(2009) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.

12.

Kress

(2009) What is mode? In: Jewitt

(ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 54–67.

13.

Kress

(2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.

14.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

15.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.

16.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(2002) Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes from a grammar of colour. Visual Communication 1(3): 343–368.

17.

Kress

Jewitt

Ogborn

et al . (2001) Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Continuum.

18.

Lampropoulou

(2014) ‘Greece will decide the future of Europe’: The re-contextualisation of the Greek national elections in a British broadsheet newspaper. Discourse & Society 25(4): 466–481.

19.

Lemke

(1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: Martin

Veel

(eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87–103.

20.

Lester

(2006) The Conservative Party replaces ‘torch’ icon with oak tree logo. Marketing Week. Available at: http://www.marketingweek.com/2006/09/15/the-conservative-party-replaces-torch-icon-with-oak-tree-logo/

21.

Lykou

Mitsikopoulou

(2017) The chronicle of an ongoing crisis: Diachronic media representations of Greece and Europe in the Greek press. In: Hatzidaki

Goutsos

(eds) Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 113–150.

22.

McClurg

(2009) In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. By John G. Geer (University of Chicago Press, 2006). The Journal of Politics 71(2): 758–760.

23.

Mackay

(2013a) Legitimation by Multimodal Means: A Theoretical and Analytical Enquiry with Specific Reference to American Political Spot Advertisements (Linguistics and English Language). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

24.

Mackay

(2013b) Multimodal legitimation: Looking and listening to Obama’s ads. In: Cap

Okulska

(eds) Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–378.

25.

Mackay

(2015) Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence. Discourse & Society 26(3): 323–348.

26.

Martin Rojo

Van Dijk

(1997) There was a problem, and it was solved: Legitimating the expulsion of illegal migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society 8(4): 523–566.

27.

Martinec

Salway

(2005) A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371.

28.

Messaris

(1997) Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. London: SAGE.

29.

New Democracy (ND) (2016) Οπτική ταυτότητα [Visual identity]. Available at: http://nd.gr/ipostiriksi/optiki-taytotita (accessed 10 September 2017).

30.

Norris

(2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.

31.

O’Halloran

(2005) Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.

32.

Papadimitriou

Zartaloudis

(2015) European discourses on managing the Greek crisis: Denial, distancing and the politics of blame. In: Karyotis

Gerodimos

(eds) The Politics of Extreme Austerity: Greece in the Eurozone Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 34–45.

33.

Pavel

(1985) Literary Narratives. In: Van Dijk

(ed.) Discourse and Literature: New Approaches to the Analysis of Literary Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 85–104.

34.

Skai (2011) Mνημόνιο ένα χρόνο μετά: Aποδοκιμασία, αγανάκτηση, απαξίωση, ανασφάλεια [One year after the memorandum: Disapproval, anger, disdain, insecurity]. Available at: http://www.skai.gr/news/politics/article/169875/mnimonio-ena-hrono-meta-apodokimasia-aganaktisi-apaxiosi-anasfaleia (accessed 08.08.2017)

35.

Skai (2015) Κλείσιμο του χάσματος μεταξύ ΣΥΡΙΖΑ και ΝΔ δείχνει νέα δημοσκόπηση [The discrepancy between Syriza and new democracy is mitigated according to a new poll]. Available at: http://www.skai.gr/news/politics/article/272431/kleisimo-tou-hasmatos-metaxu-suriza-kai-nd-deihnei-nea-dimoskopisi/ (accessed 10 August 2017).

36.

Smith

(2010) The Greek spirit of resistance turns its gun on the IMF. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/09/greece-debt-crisis-euro-imf (accessed 01.09.2017)

37.

Smith

(2014) ‘SYRIZA’s chief economist plots a radical Greek evolution within the eurozone’. The Guardian, 23 December. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/23/syriza-john-milios-greece-eurozone (accessed 05 September 2017).

38.

Stenglin

(2009) Space odyssey: Towards a social semiotic model of 3D space. Visual Communication 8(1): 35–64.

39.

Tzogopoulos

(2016) The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press. London and New York: Routledge.

40.

Van Dijk

(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.

41.

Van Dijk

(2006) Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17(3): 359–383.

42.

Van Leeuwen

(1999) Speech, Music, Sound. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Van Leeuwen

(2005) An Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.

44.

Van Leeuwen

(2007a) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112.

45.

Van Leeuwen

(2007b) Sound and vision. Visual Communication 6: 136–145.

46.

Van Leeuwen

(2009a) Parametric systems The case of voice quality. In: Jewitt

(ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 68–78.

47.

Van Leeuwen

(2009b) Some notes on the musical landscape. Transforming Cultures eJournal 4. Available at: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/TfC/article/view/1056

48.

Van Leeuwen

(2012) The critical analysis of musical discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 9: 319–328.

49.

Van Leeuwen

Wodak

(1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1: 83–118.

50.

Vasilopoulou

Halikiopoulou

Exadaktylos

(2014) ‘Greece in Crisis: Austerity, populism and the politics of blame’. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2): 388–402.

51.

Vernardakis

(2011) Political Parties, Elections and Party System: The Transformations of Political Representation 1990–2010. Athens: Sakkoulas.