Despite the adoption of the term headline for both print news and broadcast news, their roles in the different media are not the same. Print headlines are mostly contiguous with the story to which they refer. Broadcast headlines, however, are often at some temporal distance from their associated news item. In the print medium every story carries a headline. In broadcast news only some items are headlined. And yet, whereas the linguistic properties of print headlines have been much studied, almost no attention has been given to broadcast headlines. This article uses a corpus of headlines from BBC television news to explore their discursive form and function. It isolates a basic structure of {heading (+supplement)} for television news headlines and delineates a repertoire of patterns through which the structure is realised. In doing so, it suggests that the core function of television news headlines is to engage with the audience by projecting aspects of their news values forward through the programme.
AtkinsonJMDrewP (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
2.
BatesonG (1987 [1955]). A theory of play and fantasy. In: BatesonG (ed.) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. London: Jason Aronson, pp. 138–148.
3.
BellA (1991) The Language of News Media. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
4.
ClaymanS (1988) Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems35(4): 474–492.
5.
ClaymanSHeritageJ (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ConboyM (2006) Tabloid Britain: Constructing a Community through Language. London: Routledge.
DorD (2003) On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics35(5): 695–721.
9.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
FaircloughN (1994) Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In: KeatRWhiteleyNAbercrombieN (eds) The Authority of the Consumer. London: Routledge, pp. 253–268.
11.
FroshP (2009) The face of television. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science625(1): 87–102.
12.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13.
GoffmanE (1983) The interaction order: American Sociological Association 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review48(1): 1–17.
14.
GreatbatchD (1986) Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society8(4): 441–455.
15.
HallidayMAK (1976) Types of process. In: KressG (ed.) Halliday: System and Function in Language. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–173.
16.
HallidayMAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Hodder Arnold.
17.
HallidayMAK (1994 [1985]) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
18.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCMIM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Arnold.
19.
HeritageJClaymanS (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
20.
HeritageJMaynardDW (2006) Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HutchbyI (2006) Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. New York: Open University Press.
LabovW (1972) Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
LabovWWaletzkyJ (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In: HelmJ (ed.) Essays on the Visual and Verbal Arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 12–44.
25.
Lorenzo-DusN (2009) Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MaynardDWHeritageJ (2005) Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education39(4): 428–435.
27.
MontgomeryM (1991) Our tune: A study of a discourse genre. In: ScannellP (ed.) Broadcast Talk. London: SAGE, pp. 138–177.
28.
MontgomeryM (2007) The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. New York: Routledge.
29.
MontgomeryM (2008) The discourse of the broadcast news interview: A typology. Journalism Studies9(2): 260–277.
30.
PerfettiCABeverlySBellL. (1987) Comprehending newspaper headlines. Journal of Memory and Language26(6): 692–713.
ScannellP (2014) Television and the Meaning of ‘Live’: An Enquiry into the Human Situation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
SchegloffEASacksH (1984 [1973]) Opening up closings. In: BaughJSherzerJ (eds) Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 69–99.
36.
SchegloffEAJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53(2): 361–382.
37.
SchiffrinD (1980) Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry50(3–4): 199–236.
38.
SeoS (2013) Hallidayean transitivity analysis: The battle for Tripoli in the contrasting headlines of two national newspapers. Discourse & Society24(6): 774–791.
39.
SinclairJCoulthardM (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Van DijkTA (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
WilliamsR (1990 [1974]) Television: Technology and Cultural Form (ed. WilliamsE), 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
42.
ZelizerB (1989) ‘Saying’ as collective practice: Quoting and differential address in the news. Text: An-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse9(4): 369–388.
