This study examines discursive representations of judicial power in Russian print media. The data are drawn from governmental and oppositional newspapers and cover a six-month period during 2013. Using an approach that is informed by Critical Discourse Analysis and a pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation, the authors distinguish strategies and specific linguistic means as well as argumentation fallacies that journalists employ in the articles to construct the representation which is consistent with a newspaper’s ideology.
BuschB (2006) Media, politics, and discourse: Interactions. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 609–616.
3.
DankovaN (2014) Репрезентация ритуального характера судебного дискурса в российских СМИ [Representation of the ritual component of courtroom discourse in the Russian media]. In: BarabashODubrovskayaTKanakinaG (eds) Язык. Право. Общество: сборник статей II всероссийской научно-практической конференции [Language. Law. Society: Second International Scientific Conference Proceedings]. Penza: Penza State University, pp. 115–118.
4.
DubrovskayaTGulyaykinaS (2013) О роли печатных СМИ в создании имиджа российской судебной власти [On the role of printed media in constructing the image of Russian judicial power]. In: BarabashODubrovskayaTKanakinaG (eds) Язык. Право. Общество: сборник статей всероссийской научно-практической конференции [Language. Law. Society: International Scientific Conference Proceedings]. Penza: Penza State University, pp. 118–124.
5.
EntmanRM (2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57: 163–173.
6.
FaircloughN (2004) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
7.
GarzM (2013) Unemployment expectations, excessive pessimism, and news coverage. Journal of Economic Psychology34: 156–168.
8.
IglicarA (2011) The social perception of judicial decisions. Danube: Law and Economics Review4: 1–17.
9.
IvanovaSSpodaretsO (2010) Реализация стратегии субъективизации в структуре новостного политического дискурса СМИ [Implementation of subjectivisation strategy in the structure of political discourse in the news]. Политическая лингвистика [Political Linguistics] 3: 71–75.
10.
KlushinaN (2013) Интенциональная конфигурация медийного пространства [Intentional configuration of media space]. Политическая лингвистика [Political Linguistics] 2: 40–45.
11.
KononovaA (2008) Media effects on Russian students’ attitudes towards the USA. Russian Journal of Communication1(4): 436–454.
12.
KopylovaT (2013) Умолчание как стратегия в формировании имиджа России в испанских СМИ [Suppression as a strategy in the construction of the image of Russia in Spanish mass media]. Вестник Челябинского университета [Papers of Chelyabinsk State University] 21(312): 295–299.
13.
KormilitsynaM (2004) Попытка диалога общества с властью (по материалам публикаций в «литературной газете») [An attempt at dialogue between society and the power]. In: KormilitsynaMSirotininaO (eds) Проблемы Речевой Коммуникации: сборник научных трудов [Issues in Speech Communication: Collection of Articles. Issue 4]. Saratov: Saratov State University, pp. 7–13.
14.
KormilitsynaM (2008) Некоторые итоги исследования процессов, происходящих в языке современных
газет [A summary of the research into the language processes of modern newspapers]. In: KormilitsynaMSirotininaO (eds) Проблемы Речевой Коммуникации: сборник научных трудов [Issues in Speech Communication: Collection of Articles. Issue 8]. Saratov: Saratov State University, pp. 13–34.
15.
KulkoO (2009) Стратегии и тактики лингвистической защиты информации в дискурсе советских СМИ [Strategies and tactics of linguistic defence of information in Soviet media discourse]. Известия Волгоградского Государственного Педагогического Университета [Papers of Volgograd State Pedagogical University] 5: 111–115.
16.
LeachJ (2006) Media panics. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 607–609.
17.
McKayS (2006) Media and language. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 597–602.
18.
MarRAOatleyKDjikicM. (2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion25(5): 818–833.
19.
MatyashevskayaA (2013) Функционирование сниженной лексики в «качественной» российской прессе [The functioning of substandard lexicon in quality Russian press]. In: KormilitsynaM (ed.) Проблемы Речевой Коммуникации: сборник научных трудов [Issues in Speech Communication: Collection of Articles. Issue 13]. Saratov: Saratov State University, pp. 143–157.
20.
MautnerG (2008) Analysing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In: WodakRKrzyzanowskiM (eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 30–53.
Molek-KozakowskaK (2012) Multiple ideologies in the media construction of women in politics: A case study of gender parity debate in Poland. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines5(2): 72–87.
23.
NozhkinaE (2003) Языковая личность в структуре интервью [The speaker’s identity in interview structure]. In: KormilitsynaM (ed.) Проблемы Речевой Коммуникации: сборник научных трудов [Issues in Speech Communication: Collection of Articles. Issue 2]. Saratov: Saratov State University, pp. 39–50.
24.
PerrinD (2012) Stancing: Strategies of entextualizing stance in newswriting. Discourse, Context & Media1: 135–147.
25.
PolyakovaA (2014) Национальные вопросы: опыт Крымских СМИ [National issue: The experience of the media in the Crimea]. In: KozhemyakinYPolonskyA (eds) Дискурс современныхмасс-медиа в перспективе теории, социальной практики и образования: сборник научных трудов [Discourse of Modern Mass Media in Theoretical, Social and Educational Perspectives]. Belgorod: Belgorod State University, pp. 122–125.
26.
ReisiglNWodakR (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
27.
RuzhentsevaN (2012) Адаптационная стратегия и фактор адресата в газетно-журнальном и политическом дискурсах: заголовочный комплекс и основной текст [Adaptation strategy and the addressee factor in newspaper, magazine and political discourse: The heading complex and text]. Политическая Лингвистика [Political Linguistics] 1: 51–56.
28.
SenyakinNBalashovA (2008) Проблемные аспекты взаимодействия судейского сообщества со средствами массовой информации [Problematic aspects in interaction between the judiciary and the mass media]. Российский судья [Russian Judge] 5: 39–41.
29.
SorokaSN (2006) Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics68(2): 372–385.
30.
SowińskaADubrovskayaT (2012a) Discursive construction and transformation of ‘us’ and ‘them’ categories in the newspaper coverage on the US anti-ballistic missile system: Polish versus Russian view. Discourse & Communication6(4): 449–468.
31.
SowińskaADubrovskayaT (2012b) Discursive strategies in the media construction of Poland, Russia and the USA in the context of the debate on the US anti-ballistic missile defense shield in Polish and Russian quality papers. In: SkrzypczakWFojtTWacewiczS (eds) Exploring Language through Contrast. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 268–287.
32.
SveshnikovaNYagubovaM (2006) Жаргонное слово в языке СМИ [Jargon lexis in the media]. In: KormilitsynaMSirotininaO (eds) Проблемы Речевой Коммуникации: сборник научных трудов [Issues in Speech Communication: Collection of Articles. Issue 6]. Saratov: Saratov State University, pp. 70–77.
33.
ThornborrowJ (2006) Media: Analysis and methods. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 616–623.
34.
Van DalenA (2012) Structural bias in cross-national perspective: How political systems and journalism cultures influence government dominance in the news. The International Journal of Press/Politics17(1): 32–55.
35.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.
36.
Van EemerenFHGrootendorstR (1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Van LeeuwenT (2003) The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-CoulthardCRCoulthardM (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32–70.
38.
VertommenBVandendaeleAVan PraetE (2012) Towards a multidimensional approach to journalistic stance: Analyzing foreign media coverage of Belgium. Discourse, Context & Media1: 123–134.
39.
ZhdanovaI (2013) Коммуникативные стратегии толерантного газетного дискурса русскоязычных зарубежных СМИ [Communicative strategies of tolerant discourse in foreign Russian-language newspapers]. Филологические Науки. Вопросы Теории и Практики [Philological Studies. Theoretical and Practical Issues] 3(2): 71–75.
40.
ZotovaA (2013) Коммуникативные стратегии в современном медиадискурсе и деривационные способы их реализации [Communicative strategies in modern mass media discourse and word formation as a way of their implementation]. Современные Проблемы Науки и Образования [Recent Problems of Science and Education] 6: 752.
