Marketized university discourse: A synchronic and diachronic comparison of the discursive constructions of employer organizations in academic and business job advertisements
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2014
Marketized university discourse: A synchronic and diachronic comparison of the discursive constructions of employer organizations in academic and business job advertisements
UK universities have gone through drastic changes driven by the marketization of higher education. From the perspective of critical discourse analysis, Fairclough hypothesizes that university discourse will be colonized by business discourse. While a number of studies have been conducted, to my knowledge no study has compared university discourse and business discourse both synchronically and diachronically. This article compares how employer organizations are discursively constructed synchronically and diachronically in 240 academic and business job advertisements. The analytical frameworks are transitivity analysis and modality. The results indicate that academic job advertisements have changed from not mentioning organizations to discursively constructing organizations in a promotional manner like business job advertisements. In addition, universities reframe themselves as businesses, entrepreneurs and service providers. This article contends that universities should be selective in adopting business discourse and maintain their identity as educational institutions.
AskehaveI (2007) The impact of marketization on higher education genres: The international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies9(6): 723–742.
2.
BarnettR (2011) The marketised university: Defending the indefensible. In: MolesworthMScullionRNixonE (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 39–51.
3.
BrownPLevinsonS (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BrownR (2011) The march of the market. In: MolesworthMScullionRNixonE (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 11–24.
5.
CaiazzoL (2011) Hybridization in institutional language: Exploring we in the ‘about us’ page of university websites. In: SarangiSPoleseVCaliedoG (eds) Genre(s) on the Move: Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, pp. 243–260.
6.
Charteris-BlackJ (2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CoffieldFWilliamsonB (1997) Repositioning Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education.
8.
ConnellIGalasińskiD (1998) Academic mission statements: An exercise in negotiation. Discourse & Society9(4): 457–479.
9.
DeemR (2001) Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important?Comparative Education37(1): 7–20.
10.
DeemRBrehonyKJ (2005) Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education31(2): 217–235.
11.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
FaircloughN (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society4(2): 133–168.
13.
FaircloughN (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn.Harlow: Longman.
14.
FoskettN (2011) Markets, government, funding and the marketisation of UK higher education. In: MolesworthMScullionRNixonE (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 25–38.
15.
HaasEFischmanG (2010) Nostalgia, entrepreneurship, and redemption: Understanding prototypes in higher education. American Educational Research Journal47(3): 532–562.
16.
HallidayMAMatthiessenCM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold Publishers.
17.
HarleySMuller-CamenMCollinA (2004) From academic communities to managed organisations: The implications for academic careers in UK and German universities. Journal of Vocational Behavior64(2): 329–345.
18.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HuangY (2007) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
JohnsonH (2001) Neutral, colluding or subversive? Recognizing the political implications of the marketing subdiscourses in English higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership29(3): 261–274.
22.
KheovichaiB (2014) Marketization in the language of UK university recruitment: A critical discourse analysis and corpus comparison of university and finance industry job advertisements. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
23.
KollerV (2004) Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
LoveK (2008) Higher education, pedagogy and the ‘customerisation’ of teaching and learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education42(1): 15–34.
25.
MartinJRWhitePRR (2005) The language of evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MautnerG (2010) Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. New York: Routledge.
27.
MayrA (2008) Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London and New York: Continuum.
28.
MorrishLSauntsonH (2013) ‘Business-facing motors for economic development’: An appraisal analysis of visions and values in the marketised UK university. Critical Discourse Studies1: 37–41.
29.
MulderrigJM (2006) The governance of education: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of UK education policy texts 1972–2005. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
30.
PearceM (2004) The marketization of discourse about education in UK general election manifestos. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse24(2): 245–265.
31.
SauntsonHMorrishL (2011) Vision, values and international excellence: The ‘products’ that university mission statements sell to students. In: MolesworthMScullionRNixonE (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 73–85.
32.
SlaterK (2010) Commercities? A corpus-driven analysis of the marketization of British universities. Master’s dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK.
33.
SlaughterSLeslieLL (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
TeoP (2007) The marketisation of higher education: A comparative case-study of two universities in Singapore. Critical Approach to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines1(1): 95–111.
35.
TomlinsonS (2005) Education in a Post-welfare Society. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
36.
TrowlerP (2001) Captured by the discourse? The socially constitutive power of new higher education discourse in the UK. Organization8(2): 183–201.
37.
WilliamsJ (2011) Constructing consumption: What media representations reveal about today’s students. In: MolesworthMScullionRNixonE (eds) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 170–182.
38.
WodakRFaircloughN (2010) Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies7(1): 19–40.
39.
XiongT (2012) Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society23(3): 318–337.
