This article explores how we use social media to construe identities and align with others into communities of shared values. The focus is on how ‘users of language perform their identities within uses of language’: How do personae using the microblogging service Twitter perform relational identities as they enact discourse fellowships? Addressing this question means understanding how personae enter into ambient affiliation. Such affiliation is ambient in the sense that social media users may not be interacting directly, but instead participating in mass performances of hashtagging or contributing to iterations of Internet memes. This article will consider three key bonds (self-deprecation, frazzle and addiction) using both a 100 million-word corpus of posts and a smaller specialized corpus collected by capturing the entire Twitter stream of a particular user.
AndroutsopoulosJ (2006) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 419–438.
2.
BatesonG (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Aylesbury: Intertext.
3.
BednarekM (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.
4.
BednarekM (2011) Expressivity and televisual characterization. Language and Literature20: 3–21.
5.
BednarekM (in press) What we contrarians already know: Individual and communal aspects of attitudinal identity. In: CharlesMGroomNJohnS (eds) Corpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
6.
BednarekMMartinJR (2010) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum.
7.
BenwellBStokoeE (2007) Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8.
BernsteinB (2000) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, rev. edn. London: Taylor & Francis.
9.
BizzellP (1992) What is a discourse community? In:Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 222–237.
10.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
11.
boyddHeerJ (2006) Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. System Sciences, 2006. HICSS’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 59c.
12.
BrownP (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BucholtzM (2009) From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In: JaffeA (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 146–170.
14.
BucholtzMHallK (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7: 585–614.
15.
CampoyJMHEspinosaJAC (2012) Style-shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Philadephia, PA and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
CouplandJ (2000) Small Talk. Harlow: Longman.
17.
CouplandN (2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. London: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EckertP (2000) Language Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. New York: Wiley.
19.
EllisonNboydd (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 151.
20.
FirthJR (1957) Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
21.
FirthJR (1964) The Tongues of Men [1937] and Speech [1930]. London: Oxford University Press.
22.
FirthJR (1968) Selected Papers of JR Firth, 1952–59. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
23.
GilpinDR (2010) Working the Twittersphere: Microblogging as professional identity construction. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) The Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 232–250.
24.
HallidayMAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
25.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
26.
HolmesJ (2000) Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies2: 159–185.
27.
HylandK (2009) Constraint vs creativity: Identity and disciplinarity in academic writing. In: Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 25–52.
28.
JaffeA (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KnightN (2010) Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In: BednarekMMartinJR (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 35–58.
30.
LopezLK (2009) The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society11: 729–747.
31.
MalinowskiB (1972) Phatic communion. In: LaverJHutchesonS (eds) Communication in Face-to-face Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 146–152.
32.
MartinJR (2000) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In: HunstonSThompsonG (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–175.
33.
MartinJR (2002) Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation. In: CandlinChristopher N (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 187–227.
34.
MartinJR (2009) Realisation, instantiation and individuation: Some thoughts on identity in youth justice conferencing. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada25: 549–583.
35.
MartinJRRoseD (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London and Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.
36.
MartinJRWhitePRR (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
MartinJRZappavignaM. (in press) Youth justice conferencing as ceremonial redress. International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse.
38.
MartinJRZappavignaMDwyerPCléirighC (2013) Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in youth justice conferencing. Text and Talk33: 467–496.
39.
MarwickA (2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17: 139–158.
40.
OulasvirtaALehtonenEKurvinenE. (2010) Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing14: 237–249.
41.
PageR (2012) The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication6: 181–201.
42.
PapacharissiZ (2010) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
43.
PolanyiM (1983) The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
44.
PriorP (2003) Are communities of practice really an alternative to discourse communities? Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA, 22–25 March.
45.
SchnoebelenT (2012) Do you smile with your nose? Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics18: 117–125.
46.
SeargeantPTaggC (in press) Language and social media: Communication and community online. In: Language and Social Media: Communication and Community Online. London: Palgrave.
Spencer-OateyH (2007) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics39: 639–656.
49.
StenglinM (2008) Olympism: How a bonding icon gets its ‘charge’. In: Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in the Contexts of Education. London: Continuum, pp. 50–66.
50.
SunderlandJ (2006) ‘Parenting’ or ‘mothering’? The case of modern childcare magazines. Discourse & Society17: 503–528.
51.
TajfelH (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American223: 96–102.
52.
ThurlowCMroczekK (2011) Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
53.
TrantJ (2009) Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information10: 1–44.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
WittelsH (2012) Humblebrag: The Art of False Modesty. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
57.
ZappavignaM (2011) Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society13: 788–806.
58.
ZappavignaM (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
59.
ZappavignaM (2013) Tacit Knowledge and Spoken Discourse. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
60.
ZappavignaM (in press) CoffeeTweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter. In: SeargeantPTaggC (eds) The Language of Social Media: Communication and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
ZappavignaMDwyerPMartinJR (2008) Syndromes of meaning: Exploring patterned coupling in a NSW Youth Justice Conference. In: MahboobAKnightN (eds) Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 103–117.
62.
ZhaoS (2010) Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description In: BednarekMMartinJ (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum, pp. 195–218.
63.
ZhaoS (2011) Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
64.
ZimmermanDH (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In: AntakiCWiddicombeS (eds) Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 87–106.
