This article investigates how text messages and mobile phone calls interrelate as parts of continuous communication sequences. Based on the recorded mobile communication of 14-year-olds in Denmark and a conversation-analytic approach, the article will show that after a text message in a continuous communication sequence, four different types of conversation may follow: the answer (after a text message demanding a reply), the reminder (in case of a missing text message), the resumption of conversation (after a closed text message exchange) and the confirmation (after a text message with a request for/promise of a call). In itself, the change from text message to conversation requires no interactional efforts from the participants. However, changes of mode are related to the different communicative possibilities the text message and the phone call offer: text messages and calls have distinct formal qualities that govern their uses, and participants in a given sequence move between the two modes, exploiting the potential of each as they ascribe meaning to the written and spoken media.
ArminenILeinonenM (2006) Mobile phone call openings: Tailoring answers to personalized summonses. Discourse Studies8(3): 339–368.
2.
FirthA (1991) Discourse at Work: Negotiating by Telex, Fax and Phone. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
3.
FortunatiL (2001) The mobile phone between orality and writing. Colloque international sur les usages et services des télécommunications: Actes du 3ème colloque CIUST, Paris, France, 12–14juin.
4.
FrehnerC (2008) Email, SMS, MMS: The Linguistic Creativity of Asynchronous Discourse in the New Media Age. Bern and New York: Peter Lang.
5.
GibbonDKulM (2010) Economy strategies in restricted communication channels. A study of Polish short text messages. In: JørgensenJN (ed.) Vallah, Gurkensalat 4U & Me! Current Perspectives in the Study of Youth Language. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 75–98.
6.
GrinterREEldridgeM (2001) y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg. 7th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW).
7.
HårdafSegerstadY (2005) Language in SMS: A socio-linguistic view. In: HarperRPalenLATaylorA (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 313–333.
8.
HopperR (1992) Telephone Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Houtkoop-SteenstraH (1991) Opening sequences in Dutch telephone conversations. In: BodenDZimmermanD (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity, 232–250.
10.
HutchbyIBarnettS (2005) Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation. Discourse Studies7(2): 147–171.
11.
HutchbyITannaV (2008) Aspects of sequential organization in text message exchange. Discourse & Communication2(2): 143–164.
12.
JeffersonG (1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica9(1): 47–96.
13.
LaursenD (2005) Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication. In: HarperRPalenLATaylorA (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 53–73.
14.
LaursenD (2006) Det mobile samtalerum: unges kommunikations- og samværsformer via mobiltelefonen [Mobile spaces of communication. The interactional and social patterns of adolescents’ mobile phone communication]. PhD thesis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
15.
LaursenD (2010) Did he make the bus? Continuous communication among young people via mobile telephone. In: JørgensenJN (ed.) Vallah, Gurkensalat 4U & Me! Current Perspectives in the Study of Youth Language. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 25–41.
16.
LindstromA (1994) Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society23(2): 231–252.
17.
LingRBaronNS (2007) Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology26(3): 291–298.
18.
MandelbaumJS (2003) Interactive methods of constructing relationships. In: HopperRGlennPJLeBaronCDMandelbaumJS (eds) Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honour of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 625.
19.
NardiAWhittakerSBradnerE (2000) Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
20.
O’HaraKPerryM. (2001) Exploring the relationship between mobile phone and document activity during business travel. In: BrownBGreenNHarperH (eds) Wireless World: Social and Interactional Implications of Wireless Technology. London: Springer Verlag.
21.
PomerantzAMandelbaumJ (2005) A conversation analytic approach to relationships: Their relevance for interactional conduct. In: FitchKLSandersRE (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, xxi, 505.
22.
RasmussenG (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualen interkulturellen Gesprächen: eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischen Franzosen und Dänen und zwischen Deutschen und Dänen, Iudicium.
23.
SacksH (1995) Lectures on Conversation, ed. JeffersonG.Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
SchegloffEA (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. merican Anthropologist70(6): 1075–1095.
25.
SchegloffEA (1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 23–78.
26.
SchegloffEA (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies9(2–3): 111–151.
27.
SchegloffEA (1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction26(1): 99–128.
28.
SchegloffEASacksH (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8(4): 289–327.
29.
SpagnolliAGamberiniL (2007) Interacting via SMS: Practices of social closeness and reciprocation. British Journal of Social Psychology46(2): 343–364.
30.
WeilenmannA (2003) Doing Mobility. Gothenburg Studies in Informatics, report no. 28. Gothenburg: Department of Informatics, Gothenburg University.
