Through a grounded theory analysis of 1301 collection reviews from The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, issued between 1949 and 2010, the article discusses the shift in the themes that journalists employ to make sense of the latest collections. Contemporary journalists pay far less attention to the materiality of fashion than their earlier colleagues did. In the late 20th century they construed designer fashion as an intellectual practice. The article traces this shift to developments in the structural organization of the field of high-end fashion production, which today is involved in a process of de-artification, as the commercial aspects of the fashion system became more apparent in the later 20th century. In the 1990s leading fashion journalists drew on the new intellectual conception of designer fashion to engage in a process of re-artification. Hereby they seek to create an image of cultural worth for their object of criticism and for themselves, while they also seek to reinforce the long-standing but challenged division between mass market and high-end fashion.
GreenN (1997) Ready-to-Wear and Ready-to-Work: A Century of Industry and Immigrants in Paris and New York. Durham: Duke University Press.
25.
Gregg DugganG (2001) The greatest show on earth: A look at contemporary fashion shows and their relation to performance art. Fashion Theory5(3): 243–270.
26.
GrumbachD (2008) Histoires de la mode. Paris: Editions du Regard.
27.
JamesonF (1984) Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, July–August (146): 59–92.
28.
KaiserS (2012) Fashion and Cultural Studies. Oxford : Berg.
29.
KawamuraY (2004) The Japanese Revolution in Paris Fashion. Oxford: Berg.
30.
KawamuraY (2005) Fashion-ologie: An Introduction to Fashion Studies. Oxford: Berg.
31.
KönigA (2006) Glossy words: An analysis of fashion writing in BritishVogue. Fashion Theory10(1/2): 205–224.
32.
LaermansR (forthcoming) Dance beyond ‘the human’: Thinking through recent development in contemporary dance. In: LaermansR, Moving Together: Making and Theorizing Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.
33.
LamontMMolnarV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
34.
LashSUrryJ (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: SAGE.
35.
LeWittS (1967) Paragraphs on conceptual art. In: AlberroAStimsonB (eds) Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 12–16.
36.
LipovetskyG (2002) The Empire of Fashion: Dressing Modern Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37.
MartinR (1998) Addressing the dress. In: BergerM (ed.) The Crisis of Criticism. New York: The New Press, pp. 51–70.
38.
McRobbieA (1998) British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry?London: Routledge.
NicewongerT (2013) The fashion designer as artist: Reflections on 50 years of pedagogy. Catalogue on the Occasion of the Exhibition ‘Happy Birthday Dear Academie’, MOMU – Fashion Museum Province of Antwerp. Tielt: Lannoo, pp. 171–190.
PhilipsMS (2004) Distance and historical representation. History Workshop Journal57: 123–141.
45.
RocamoraA (2002a) Le Monde’s discours de mode: Creating the créateurs. French Cultural Studiesxiii: 83–98.
46.
RocamoraA (2002b) Fields of fashion: Critical insights into Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. Journal of Consumer Culture2: 341–362.
47.
RocamoraA (2009) Fashioning the City: Paris, Fashion and the Media. London: I.B. Tauris.
48.
RuttenbergJ (2013) This is not a fashion critic: An interview with Guy Trebay. Fashion Projects4 (On Fashion Criticism).
49.
SchellekensE (2007) The aesthetic value of ideas. In: GoldiePSchellekensE (eds) Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–91.
