The paper explores the central role of artworks in the field of contemporary art. It is based on an ethnographic study of the conservation laboratory at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York and draws from three detailed case studies where the temporal and spatial trajectory of artworks led to processes of competition, collaboration, and repositioning among the agents involved in the acquisition, exhibition and conservation of these artworks. The study demonstrates the importance of artworks qua physical objects in the field of contemporary art, claiming attention to materiality in field theory and engaging with an object-oriented methodology in field analysis. Artworks are shown to intervene in field processes, both reproducing divisions and re-drawing boundaries within and between fields, and actualizing positions of individuals and institutions.
AltshulerB (ed.) (2005) Collecting the New. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
AndersonBWylieJ (2009) On geography and materiality. Environment and Planning A41(2): 318–335.
3.
AppaduraiA (ed.) (1986) The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BeckerHS (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BeckerHSPessinA (2006) A dialogue on the ideas of ‘world’ and ‘field’. Sociological Forum21(2): 275–286.
6.
BennettT (1988) The exhibitionary complex. New Formations4(Spring): 73–102.
7.
BenzecryCE (2012) The Opera Fanatic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BewerFG (2010) A Laboratory for Art : Harvard’s Fogg Museum and the Emergence of Conservation in America, 1900–1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Art Museum; New Haven: Yale University Press.
9.
BornG (2011) Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture16(4): 376–388.
10.
BotteroWCrossleyN (2011) Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 99–119.
11.
BourdieuP (1993) The Field of Cultural Production : Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1996) The Rules of Art : Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
BourdieuP. (1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
BuskirkM (2003) The Contingent Object of Contemporary Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
ClarkAChalmersD (1998) The extended mind. Analysis58(1): 7–19
18.
CraneD (1987) The Transformation of the Avant-garde : The New York Art World, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DelaFuenteE (2007) The ‘new sociology of art’: Putting art back into social science approaches to the arts. Cultural Sociology1(3): 409–425.
20.
DeNoraT (2004) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Domínguez RubioF (2012) The material production of the spiral jetty: A study of culture in the making. Cultural Sociology6(2): 143–161.
22.
GalisonPL (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HalleDRobinsonK (2010) Globalization, contemporary art, and complexity. In: HallJGrindstaffLMing-ChangL (eds) Sociology of Culture: A Handbook. London: Routledge, pp. 378–387.
25.
HarawayDJ (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
26.
HarmanG (2011) The Quadruple Object. Washington, DC: Zero Books.
27.
HarveyPCasellaEEvansGKnoxHMcLeanCSilvaEThoburnNWoodwardK (eds) (2013) Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion. London: Routledge.
28.
HennionA (2003) Music and mediation : Toward a new sociology of music. In: ClaytonMHarbertTMiddletonR (eds) The Cultural Study of Music. London: Routledge, pp. 80–91.
29.
HutchinsE (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
KantorS (2003) Alfred H. Barr, Jr. and the Intellectual Origins of the Museum of Modern Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
KopytoffI (1986) The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In: AppaduraiA (ed.) The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–94.
32.
LahireB (1999) Champ, hors-champ, contrechamp. In: Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Dettes et critiques. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 23–57.
33.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life : The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
35.
LawJ (1991) A Sociology of Monsters : Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London/New York: Routledge.
36.
LorenteJP (1998) Cathedrals of Urban Modernity : The First Museums of Contemporary Art, 1800–1930. London: Ashgate.
37.
LorenteJP (2011) The Museums of Contemporary Art : Notion and Development. London: Ashgate.
38.
MartinJL (2003) What is field theory?American Journal of Sociology109(1): 1–49.
39.
MillerD (1987) Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
MillerD (2010) Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41.
PriorN (2008) Putting a glitch in the field: Bourdieu, actor network theory and contemporary music. Cultural Sociology2(3): 301–319.
42.
QueminA (2006) Globalization and mixing in the visual arts: An empirical survey of ‘high culture’ and globalization. International Sociology21(4): 522–550.
43.
SavageM (2011) The lost urban sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. In: BridgesGWatsonS (eds) The Blackwell City Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 511–520.
44.
SavageMSilvaEB (2013) Field analysis in cultural sociology. Cultural Sociology7(2).
SilvaEB (2013a) Introduction to unsettling objects. In: HarveyP. (eds), Objects and Materials. London: Routledge.
47.
SilvaEB (2013b) Haunting in the material of everyday life. In: HarveyP., Objects and Materials. London: Routledge.
48.
Stanley-PriceNTalleyMKMelucco VaccaroA (1996) Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
49.
StrandvadSM (2012) Attached by the product: A socio-material direction in the sociology of art. Cultural Sociology6(2): 163–176.
