This paper is based on research on wind music in France, where this music is situated at the lowest level in the cultural hierarchy. We examine this music from three points of view: (1) in light of its position in the musical field, (2) as a specific sub-field and (3) at the local level of concrete practices. Then, thanks to the socio-cultural mapping of the orchestras and of their musicians, we establish various combinations of these three levels in the concrete and symbolic organization of musical activities. This framework allows us to evaluate the various degrees of exposure to cultural domination and the possibilities of escaping it.
ArderyJS (1997) Loser wins: Outsider art and the salvaging of disinterestedness. Poetics24(5): 329–346.
2.
BeckerHS (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BeckerHSPessinA (2006) A dialogue on the ideas of ‘world’ and ‘field’. Sociological Forum21(2): 275–286.
4.
BennettT (2011) Culture, choice, necessity: A political critique of Bourdieu’s aesthetic. Poetics39(6): 530–546
5.
BennettTSavageMSilvaE et al. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.
6.
BlasiusJFriedrichsJ (2008) Lifestyles in distressed neighbourhoods: A test of Bourdieu’s taste of necessity hypothesis. Poetics36(1): 24–44.
7.
BotteroWCrossleyN (2011) Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 99–119.
8.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
9.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (1996) The Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity.
11.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
ChampagneP (2002) L’Héritage refusé. La Crise de la reproduction sociale de la Paysannerie Française, 1950–2000. Paris: Seuil.
13.
De NooyW (1991) Social networks and classification in literature. Poetics20(6): 507–537.
14.
De NooyW (2003) Fields and networks: Correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory. Poetics31(5–6): 305–327.
15.
DuboisVMéonJ-MPierruE (2013) The Sociology of Wind Bands: Amateur Music between Domination and Autonomy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
16.
DuboisV (2011) Lowbrow culture and French cultural policy: The socio-political logics of a changing and paradoxical relationship. International Journal of Cultural Policy17(4): 394–404.
17.
FinneganR (1989) The Hidden Musicians: Music-Making in an English Town. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FulcherJ (1979) The Orpheon societies: ‘Music for the workers’ in second-empire France. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music10(1): 47–56.
19.
GerhardsJAnheierHK (1989) The literary field: An empirical investigation of Bourdieu’s sociology of art. International Sociology4(2): 131–146.
20.
GrignonCPasseronJ-C (1989) Le Savant et le populaire. Paris: Gallimard-EHESS.
21.
GumplowiczP (1985) Le dossier ‘orphéon’: musique et sociabilités. In: Révoltes logiques, Esthétiques du peuple. Paris: La Découverte-Presses Universitaires de Vincennes. pp. 55–76.
22.
GumplowiczP (2011) Les Travaux d’Orphée. Deux siècles de oratique musicale en France (1820–2000): Harmonies, chorales, fanfares. Paris: Aubier.
23.
HoggartR (1957) The Uses of Literacy. London: Chatto and Windus.
24.
LamontMFournierM (eds) (1992) Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
LehmannB (2002) L’orchestre dans tous ses états. Paris: La Découverte.
26.
PoliakC (2006) Aux frontières du champ littéraire. Sociologie des écrivains amateurs. Paris: Economica.
27.
PriorN (2011) Critique and renewal in the sociology of music: Bourdieu and beyond. Cultural Sociology5(1): 121–138.
28.
ShustermanR (1999) Moving truth: Affect and authenticity in country musicals. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism57(2): 221–233.
