At the time of its conception, the producers of Stromberg, the German adaptation of the British situation comedy The Office, were accused of copyright infringement. Based on exclusive data from qualitative interviews with the creative personnel, this article contributes to the previously under-theorised field of television comedy production studies in non-Anglophone contexts. Exploring the clash of standardised procedures on the global television market with traditional practices and a distinct production culture in Germany, it challenges established theorisations of television ‘format’ and argues for a more nuanced and case-specific understanding of how adaptation processes facilitate and stimulate creativity across borders.
AltmeppenKDLantzschKWillA (2007) Flowing networks in the entertainment business: organizing international TV format trade. The International Journal on Media Management9(3): 94–104.
2.
BaumannT (2007) Die spinnen, die Deutschen: Expeditionen durch den ganz normalen Wahnsinn. Berlin: Piper.
3.
BeedenADe BruinJ (2010) The Office: articulations of national identity in television format adaptation. Television New Media11(1): 3–19.
4.
BielbyDHarringtonL (2008) Global TV: Exporting Television and Culture in the World Market. New York: University Press.
5.
BruunH (2016) The qualitative interview in media production studies. In: PatersonCLeeDSahaA et al. (eds), Advancing Media Production Research: Shifting Sites, Methods, and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 131–146.
6.
CaldwellJ (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
7.
ChalabyJ (2012) At the origin of a global industry: the TV format trade as an Anglo-American invention. Media, Culture and Society34(1): 36–52.
8.
ChalabyJ (2016) The Format Age: Television’s Entertainment Revolution. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
CraneD (2002) Culture and globalization: theoretical models and emerging trends. In: CraneDKawashimaNKawasakiK (eds), Global Culture. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 1–26.
10.
DarlingKPerzanowskiA (2017) Creativity Without Law: Challenging the Assumptions of Intellectual Property. New York: University Press.
11.
DavisJ (2007) In the office with Greg Daniels. Creative Screenwriting. September/October 2007, pp. 60–65.
12.
DaviesRSigthorssonG (2013) Introducing the Creative Industries: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
13.
EsserA (2013) The format business: franchising television content. International Journal of Digital Television4(2): 141–158.
14.
EssmannS (2008) Inside the office. A tale of 2 editors. Cinemaeditor3: 10–14.
15.
FRAPA (2018) The format recognition and protection association. Available at: http://www.frapa.org (accessed 27 January 2018).
16.
FriedmanHSchustackM (2012) Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
17.
GarnhamN (2005) From cultural to creative industries: an analysis of the implication of the ‘creative industries’ approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy11(1): 15–29.
GoodenoughW (1970) Describing a Culture: Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GrayJ (2008) Television Entertainment. London: Routledge.
21.
GüntherR (2014) Interview with author, 27 February 2014.
22.
HaugeA (2015) Negotiating and producing symbolic value. In: LorentzenASchrøderLTopsø LarsenK (eds), Spatial Dynamics in the Experience Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 39–51.
23.
HeylenR (1994) Translation Poetics and the Stage: Six French Hamlets. London: Routledge.
24.
HightC (2010) Television Mockumentary: Reflexivity, Satire and a Call to Play. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25.
HolzerD (1999) Die deutsche Sitcom: Format – Konzeption – Drehbuch – Umsetzung. Bergisch Gladbach: Lübbe Verlagsgruppe.
26.
HusmannR (2011) Interview with author, 24 June 2011.
27.
JacksonB (2008) ‘The Office’, Faux Documentary Style is harder than it looks. Sound for Picture2008: 95–98.
28.
JensenKB (2012) The qualitative research process. In: JensenKB (ed), A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies. London: Routledge, pp. 265–282.
29.
KuipersG (2008) The sociology of humor. In: RaskinV (ed), The primer of humor research. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 361–398.
30.
LaneJ (2002) The Autobiographical Documentary in America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31.
LantzschKAltmeppenKWillA (2009) Trading in TV entertainment: an analysis. In: MoranA (ed), TV Formats Worldwide. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 77–95.
32.
LarkeyE (2009) Transcultural localization strategies of Global TV Formats: the office and stromberg. In: MoranA (ed), TV Formats Worldwide. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 187–201.
33.
LavikEVan GompelS (2013) On the prospect of raising the originality requirement in copyright law: perspectives from the humanities. Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 2013-62, 60: 387–443.
34.
McCabeJAkassK (2007) Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond. New York: IB Tauris.
35.
MoranA (1998) Copycat TV: Globalisation, Program Formats and Cultural Identity. Luton: University Press.
36.
MoranA (2009a) TV Formats Worldwide. Bristol: Intellect.
37.
MoranA (2009b) Global franchising, local customizing: the cultural economy of TV program formats. Continuum32(2): 115–125.
38.
MoranAMalbonJ (2006) Understanding the Global TV Format. Bristol: Intellect.
39.
MikosL (2015) From The Office to Stromberg: adaptation strategies in German television. Continuum29(5): 694–705.
40.
MillsB (2009) The Sitcom. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
41.
MillsB (2010) On television sitcom as an invented tradition. Media International Australia134: 64–73.
42.
MillsBHortonE (2017) Creativity in the British Television Comedy Industry. New York: Routledge.
43.
MittellJ (2009) Television and American Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
NewmanMLevineE (2012) Legitimating Television. Media Convergence and Cultural Status. New York and London: Routledge.
45.
PrattACJeffcuttP (2009) Creativity, innovation and the cultural economy: Snake oil for the 21st century? In: PrattACJeffcuttP (eds), Creativity, Innovation in the Cultural Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 3–19.
46.
PikeK (1967) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
47.
RobertsonR (1995) Globalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: FeatherstoneMLashSRobertsonR (eds), Global Modernities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 25–44.
48.
RosenL (2006) Office Life. WGAW, April 2006, pp. 29–33.
49.
SchwindKH (2014) Chilled out entertainers – multi-layered sitcom performances in the British and American version of The Office. Comedy Studies5(1): 20–32.
50.
SchwindKH (2015) Like watching a motorway crash: exploring the embarrassment humor of the office. HUMOR – International Journal of Humour Research28(1): 49–70.
51.
ShahafS (2016) Decentring innovation: the Israeli television industry and the format-driven transnational turn in content development. In: AveyardKMoranAJensenM (eds), New Patterns in Global Television Formats. Chicago: Intellect, pp. 247–261.
52.
SpicerAMcKennaAMeirC (eds) (2014) Beyond the Bottom Line: The Producer in Film and Television Studies. London: Bloomsbury.
53.
TunstallJ (1993) Television Producers. London: Routledge.
54.
WaltersB (2005) TV Classics: The Office. London: BFI.
55.
WeissmannE (2012) Transnational Television Drama: Special Relations and Mutual Influence between the US and the UK. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
