Bangladesh is an environmentally vulnerable country, where environmental crimes are massive and common. However, the environmental crime prevention mechanism in the country is very weak, and traditional policing is utilized to stop these crimes. Therefore, the green criminological approach to prevent environmental crimes in Bangladesh is underdeveloped in many ways, with a total absence of the green policing model. Hence, this study focuses on attaining a critical understanding of environmental crimes in Bangladesh by exploring the key underlying factors of environmental crimes. It also attempts to contribute to the environmental crime prevention mechanism by recommending a green policing model, while identifying the key weaknesses of the existing environmental crime prevention approach. This article implements the qualitative technique of data collection, and the analysis is based on an in-depth interview of 25 respondents, belonging to different categories of stakeholders, and participant observation. It also analyses the content of newspapers to understand the patterns of environmental crimes in Bangladesh. This article finds that environmental crimes are propagated by several political, economic, institutional, and social elements, such as the political affiliation of criminals, economic profit from natural resources, absence of institutional collaboration, and lack of social consciousness. The issue has become further aggravated due to the weakness of the crime prevention mechanism. Thus, the findings of this study suggest that environmental crimes in Bangladesh should be considered and understood from green criminological perspectives and the development of a green policing model would be effective in reducing environmental crimes in the country.
AshrafulMZ (2014) Application of the principles of international environmental law in the domestic legal system of Bangladesh: A critical study on the legal framework and the position of judiciary. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science19(5): 18–24.
BarrettSWhiteR (2017) Disrupting environmental crime at the local level: An operational perspective. Palgrave Communications3(1): 1–8.
7.
BLAST vs. Bangladesh and others [“Chittagong hill cutting” case] (2000) BLAST’s mission is to make the legal system accessible to the poor and the marginalized. Available at: https://www.blast.org.bd/issues/220
EpsteinJHammettTMCollinsL (1995) Law Enforcement Response to Environmental Crime. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
14.
FaroqueSSouthN (2020) Law-enforcement challenges, responses and collaborations concerning environmental crimes and harms in Bangladesh. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Epub ahead of print 5 November. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X20969938.
15.
FosterJB (1999) Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology1052: 366–405.
16.
FosterJB (2000) Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: New York University Press.
GoyesDR (2019) Introduction to a southern green criminology. Southern Green Criminology: A Science to End Ecological Discrimination3–11. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-229-920191001.
19.
HaqueKNHChowdhuryFAKhatunKR (2015) Participatory environmental governance and climate change adaptation: Mainstreaming of tidal river management in south-west Bangladesh. In: HaH (ed.) Land and Disaster Management Strategies in Asia. New Delhi, India: Springer, pp. 189–208.
20.
HaqueN (2017) Technology mandate for greening brick industry in Bangladesh: A policy evaluation. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy19(2): 319–326.
21.
HaqueN (2018) Revisiting penalty functions for environmental violations: Evidence from a developing country. Water and Environment Journal32(4): 566–572.
22.
HasanGS (2016) Outlines of Environmental Law: Bangladesh Perspective. Dhaka: Kamrul Book House.
HossainMAZahidAMArifunnaharM, et al. (2019) Effect of brick kiln on arable land degradation, environmental pollution and consequences on livelihood of Bangladesh. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics6(2): 474–488.
25.
HossainMSFakhruddinANChowdhuryMA, et al. (2016) Impact of ship-breaking activities on the coastal environment of Bangladesh and a management system for its sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy60: 84–94.
26.
HuismanWVan ErpJ (2013) Opportunities for environmental crime: A test of situational crime prevention theory. British Journal of Criminology53(6): 1178–1200.
IslamMMShamsuzzamanMMMozumderMMH, et al. (2017) Exploitation and conservation of coastal and marine fisheries in Bangladesh: Do the fishery laws matter?Marine Policy76: 143–151.
29.
IslamMSHasanGMChowdhuryMA (2005) Destroying hills in the northeastern part of Bangladesh: A qualitative assessment of extent of the problem and its probable impact. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology2(4): 301–308.
LeeHW (2017) Taking deterrence seriously: The wide-scope deterrence theory of punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics36(1): 2–24.
32.
LubySPBiswasDGurleyES, et al. (2015) Why highly polluting methods are used to manufacture bricks in Bangladesh. Energy for Sustainable Development28: 68–74.
33.
LynchJM (2017) The greening of criminology: A perspective on the 1990s. In: SouthNBeimeP (eds) Green Criminology. London: Routledge, pp. 165–170.
34.
MahmoodSNourinFTJSiddikaA, et al. (2017) Encroachment of the Buriganga River in Bangladesh. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering5(5): 266–273.
RezaAYousufTB (2016) Impacts of waste dumping on water quality in the Buriganga River, Bangladesh and possible mitigation measures. Journal of the Environment11(1): 35–40.
SahaCKHosainJ (2016) Impact of brick kilning industry in Peri-urban Bangladesh. International Journalofenvironmentalstudies73(4): 491–501.
41.
SajalAI (2016) Common people’s access to the environment courts of Bangladesh: An appraisal. Journal of Judicial Administration Training Institute. Available at: https://www.observerbd.com/2015/07/16/100031.php
SouthN (2016) Free trade agreements, private courts and environmental exploitation: Disconnected policies, denials and moral disengagement. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy5(4): 45–59.
