Procedural justice is known to enhance perceptions of police legitimacy. Studies show that procedural justice may be less effective for some individuals and groups, while others show it to be more effective. This study investigates the contingency of the procedural justice effect and considers the effectiveness of procedural justice for certain individuals through the concept of disengagement. Utilizing a survey of 1480 ethnic minority group members, the study tests whether or not disengagement moderates the effect of procedural justice on perceptions of police legitimacy. As expected, we find procedural justice is linked to enhanced perceptions of police legitimacy, while disengagement is associated with reduced perceptions of legitimacy. Interestingly, the study finds that procedural justice is more effective for building legitimacy for ethnic minority respondents who report being highly disengaged from police. These findings highlight how police might be able to improve perceptions of their legitimacy among disaffected minority communities.
AlyA (2007) Australian Muslim responses to the discourse on terrorism in the Australian popular media. Australian Journal of Social Issues42: 27–40.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) Census of Population and Housing. Canberra: Australian Government. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/census.
3.
BlackwoodLHopkinsNReicherS (2013) I know who I am, but who do they think I am? Muslim perspectives on encounters with airport authorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies36: 1090–1108.
4.
BradfordBJacksonJ (2010) Different things to different people? The meaning and measurement of trust and confidence in policing across diverse social groups in London. Social Science Research Network Working Paper: 241–248. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1628546.
5.
BraithwaiteVA (2009) Defiance in Taxation and Governance: Resisting and Dismissing Authority in a Democracy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
6.
BrownBBenedictW (2002) Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management25: 543–580.
ColquittJALePineJAPiccoloRF. (2012) Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?Journal of Applied Psychology97: 1–15.
9.
CunneenC (2001) Conflict, Politics and Crime: Aboriginal Communities and the Police. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
10.
DelsolRShinerM (2006) Regulating stop and search: A challenge for police and community relations in England and Wales. Critical Criminology14: 241–263.
11.
DixonDMaherL (2002) Anh Hai: Policing, culture and social exclusion in a street heroin market. Policing and Society12: 93–110.
12.
JacksonJBradfordBHoughM. (2012) Compliance with the law and policing by consent: Notes on police and legal legitimacy. In: CrawfordAHucklesbyA (eds) Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge, 29–49.
13.
Jonathan-ZamirTWeisburdD (2013) The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50: 3–32.
14.
KarakusO (2017) Instrumental and normative pathways to legitimacy and public cooperation with the police in Turkey: Considering perceived neighborhood characteristics and local government performance. Justice Quarterly34(1): 25–54.
15.
KochelTR (2014) Views by St Louis County residents regarding the police and public responses to the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9, 2014. Available at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ccj_reports/2/.
16.
LindEATylerTR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
17.
LindEAVan Den BosK (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior24: 181–223.
18.
MasonG (2012) ‘I am Tomorrow’: Violence against Indian students in Australia and political denial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology45: 4–25.
19.
MazerolleLSargeantECherneyA. (2014) Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Policing. Switzerland: Springer Briefs.
20.
MeehanAJPonderMC (2002) Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling African American motorists. Justice Quarterly19: 399–430.
21.
MeredythDMcKernanHEvansR (2010) Police and Vietnamese-Australian communities in multi-ethnic Melbourne. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4: 233–240.
22.
MurphyK (2013) Policing at the margins: Fostering trust and cooperation among ethnic minority groups. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism8: 184–199.
23.
MurphyKBarkworthJ (2015) Victim willingness to report crime to police: Does procedural justice or outcome matter most?Victims & Offenders8: 178–204.
24.
MurphyKCherneyA (2011) Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology44: 235–257.
25.
MurphyKCherneyA (2012) Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology52: 181–201.
26.
MurphyKMazerolleL (2016) Policing immigrants: Using a randomized control trial of procedural justice policing to promote trust and cooperation. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Epub ahead of print 13October2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816673691.
27.
MurphyKCherneyAWickesR. (2012) The Community Capacity Survey Face-to-Face Ethnic Minority Interviews: Methodology and Preliminary Findings. Brisbane: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.
28.
MurphyKHindsLFlemingJ (2008) Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing & Society18: 136–155.
29.
ParmarA (2011) Stop and search in London: Counter-terrorist or counter-productive?Policing & Society21: 369–382.
30.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015) Interim report. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
31.
RosenbaumDSchuckACostelloS. (2005) Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly8: 343–365.
32.
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991) Royal Commission on Aboriginal Deaths in Custody: Final report. Canberra: Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation.
33.
SargeantEMurphyKCherneyA (2014) Ethnicity, trust and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model. European Journal of Criminology11: 500–524.
34.
SpalekB (2010) Community policing, trust, and Muslim communities in relation to ‘New Terrorism’. Politics & Policy38: 789–815.
35.
SunshineJTylerTR (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review37: 513–548.
36.
TankebeJ (2013) Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology51: 103–135.
37.
TylerTR (1990) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
TylerTRFaganJ (2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law6: 231–275.
39.
TylerTRHuoY (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
TylerTRLindEA (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 115–191.
41.
TylerTRWakslakCJ (2004) Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology42: 253–282.
42.
Van CraenM (2012) Determinants of ethnic minority confidence in the police. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38: 1029–1047.
43.
WarrenPY (2011) Perceptions of police disrespect during vehicle stops: A race-based analysis. Crime & Delinquency57: 356–376.
44.
WeitzerR (1999) Citizens’ perceptions of police misconduct: Race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly16: 819–846.
45.
WeitzerR (2010) Race and policing in different ecological contexts. In: RiceSKWhiteMD (eds) Race, Ethnicity, and Policing: New and Essential Readings. New York: NYU Press, 118–139.
46.
WeitzerRTuchSA (2002) Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology40: 435–456.
47.
WhiteR (2009) Ethnic diversity and differential policing in Australia: The good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of International Migration and Integration10: 359–375.
48.
WolfeSENixJKaminskiR. (2016) Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology32: 253–282.
49.
WortleySOwusu-BempahA (2009) Unequal before the law: Immigrant and racial minority perceptions of the Canadian criminal justice system. Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l’integration et de la migration internationale10: 447–473.
50.
WortleySTannerJ (2005) Inflammatory rhetoric? Baseless accusations? A response to Gabor’s critique of racial profiling research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice47: 581–610.
