This study examines the trends and effectiveness of online social networks to target youth for precision marketing under the varied mediating role of cultural dispositions, innovative aptitude, and perceived medium credibility in emerging yet distinctive marketplaces. We conducted an online survey (N = 577) in three countries representing different social, economic, and cultural values to investigate the relationships between the variables. The social identity framework was used as a theoretical framework. The results revealed that external factors like recommendations, product offers, and appearance are more relevant than an individual's traits and dispositions when evaluating products on social networks. These findings clarify the existing work and offer methodological and practical implications.
ArgoJDahlDManchandaR (2005) The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research32(2): 207–222.
2.
BradburnNMilesC (1979) Vague quantifiers. Public Opinion Quarterly43: 92–10.
3.
BrileyDWyerR (2002) The effect of group membership salience on avoiding negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research29(3): 400–415.
4.
DaghfousNPetrofJPonsF (1999) Values and adoption of innovations: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing16(4): 314–331.
5.
DuffettRG (2017) Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’ attitudes. Young Consumers18(1): 19–39.
6.
DumontL (2019) A modified view of our origins: The Christian beginning of modern individualism. In: CarrithersMCollinsSLukesS (eds) The Category of the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 93–123.
7.
FearonJ (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth8: 195–222.
8.
GazianoCMcGrathK (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly63: 451–462.
9.
HarrisLRaeA (2009) Social networks: The future of marketing for small business. Journal of Business Strategy30(5): 24–31.
10.
KangM (2020) Measuring social media credibility: A study on a measure of blog credibility. Submitted to the Institute for Public Relations, for the 2009 Ketchum Excellence in Public Relations Research Award, New York, NY.
11.
KimHPenningsJ (2019) Innovation and strategic renewal in mature markets: A study of the tennis racket industry. Organization Science20(2): 368–383.
12.
KimJLeeCEliasT (2015) Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students: Application of the knowledge-sharing model to social networking sites. Online Information Review39(3): 290–309.
13.
KimYSrivastavaJ (2019) Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on electronic commerce, Berlin, Germany.
14.
KiousisS (2001) Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society4(4): 381–403.
15.
LatanéB (1981) The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist36(4): 343–356.
16.
LatanéBWolfS (1981) The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review88(5): 438–453.
17.
LeiVVesleyF (2010) In group vs. out group: The impact of income inequality. Southern Economic Journal76(4): 1049–1063.
LenhartAPurcellKSmithA, et al. (2011) Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Research Report by Pew Internet and American Life Project, April 2011.
20.
LuYZhaoYWangB (2010) From virtual community members to c2c e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications9(4): 346–360.
21.
MakriKSchlegelmilchBB (2017) Time orientation and engagement with social networking sites: A cross-cultural study in Austria, China and Uruguay. Journal of Business Research80: 155–163.
22.
MeyerP (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly65: 567–574.
23.
MossP (2012) Exploring the macro-micro dynamic in data use practice. American Journal of Education118(2): 223–232.
24.
PentinaIZhangLBasmanovaO (2013) Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study of Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior29(4): 1546–1555.
25.
PollackKM (2011) The Arab Awakening: America and the Transformation of the Middle East. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
RogersE (1976) New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research2(4): 141–169.
27.
ShavittSLalwaniAKZhangJ, et al. (2006) The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology16(4): 325–342.
28.
SheldonPRauschnabelPAAntonyMG, et al. (2017) A cross-cultural comparison of Croatian and American social network sites: Exploring cultural differences in motives for Instagram use. Computers in Human Behavior75: 643–651.
29.
SingalisTBrownW (1995) Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research21: 354–389.
30.
SivadasEBruvoldNNelsonM (2008) A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research61: 201–210.
31.
SundarSNassC (2001) Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication51(1): 52–72.
32.
TriandisHGelfandM (1998) Converging measurements of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74: 118–128.
33.
ValosMJHaji HabibiFCasidyR, et al. (2016) Exploring the integration of social media within integrated marketing communication frameworks: Perspectives of services marketers. Marketing Intelligence and Planning34: 19–40.
34.
WilliamsJBestD (1982) Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Thirty-Nation Study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
XueKYangCYuM (2017) Impact of new media use on user’s personality traits. Quality and Quantity52(2): 739–758.
