There are two fundamental concerns about global communication for social change (CSC) research and practice that guide the present study. The first is whether CSC researchers are collecting evidence regarding whether interventions work, the second is whether the sub-field is building theory about how CSC interventions work to promote community-led change. Based on a scoping review of peer-reviewed journal articles on international participatory development interventions, this analysis shows the field continues to lack a convincing explanation of the relationship between participation, communication, empowerment and social change. A model to elucidate this relationship is offered.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 19–32.
2.
BaúV (2018) Participatory communication, theatre and peace: Performance as a tool for change at the end of conflict. Communicatio44(1): 34–54.
3.
BeryR (2003) Participatory video that empowers. In: WhiteS (ed) Participatory Video: Images That Transform and Empower. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.102–121.
4.
BradleyEHCurryLADeversKJ (2007) Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research42(4): 1758–1772.
5.
CookeBKothariU (2007) Participation: The new Tyranny?4th edLondon: Zed Books.
6.
Da CostaP (2012) The growing pains of community radio in Africa: Emerging lessons towards sustainability. Nordicom Review33: 135–148.
7.
DavisRCampbellRHildonZ, et al. (2015) Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review9(3): 323–344.
8.
EarlSCardenF (2002) Learning from complexity: The international development research centre’s experience with outcome mapping. Development in Practice12(3–4): 518–524.
9.
FairJE (1989) 29 Years of theory and research on media and development: The dominant paradigm impact. International Communication Gazette44(2): 129–150.
10.
FairJEShahH (1997) Continuities and discontinuities in communication and development research since 1958. The Journal of International Communication4(2): 3–23.
11.
FigueroaMEKincaidDLRaniM, et al. (2002) Communication for Social Change: An Integrated Model for Measuring the Process and its Outcomes. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
12.
FlewittRJonesPPotterJ, et al. (2018) ‘I enjoyed it because … you could do whatever you wanted and be creative’: Three principles for participatory research and pedagogy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education41(4): 372–386.
13.
FlynnJ (2004) Communicative power in Haberma’s theory of democracy. European Journal of Political Theory3(4): 433–454.
14.
FreireP (1970/2005) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (MB Ramos Trans). (30th Anniversary Edition ed). New York: Bloomsbury.
15.
GagliardoneIKalemeraAKogenL, et al. (2015) In search of local knowledge on ICTs in Africa. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development4(1): Art. 35.
16.
GrauenkaerLTufteT (2018) Youth-led communication for social change: Empowerment, citizen media, and cultures of governance in northern Ghana. Development in Practice28(3): 400–413.
17.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (T Burger Trans). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
18.
HornikRCMcDivittJZimickiS, et al. (2002) Communication in support of child survival: Evidence and explanations from eight countries. In: HornikRC (ed) Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.219–248.
19.
InagakiN (2007) Communicating the Impact of Communication for Development: Recent Trends in Empirical Research. Washington DC: The World Bank.
20.
JacobsonTL (2003) Participatory communication for social change: The relevance of the theory of communicative action. Annals of the International Communication Association27(1): 87–123.
21.
JacobsonTL (2016) Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach and communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication66(5): 789–810.
22.
KogenL (2018) What have we learned here? Questioning accountability in aid policy and practice. Evaluation24(1): 98–112.
23.
KogenL (2022) Better safe than sorry: Examining trauma as an obstacle to empowerment and social change in a U.S. Intimate partner violence intervention. Journal of Applied Communication Research 50(2): 189–207.
24.
KogenLArsenaultAGagliardoneI, et al. (2012) Evaluating media and communication in development: Does evidence matter? Center for Global Communication Studies. Philadelphia, USA.
25.
LennieJTacchiJ (2013) Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change. New York: Routledge.
26.
ManyozoL (2017) Communicating Development with Communities. London: Routledge.
27.
MayneJ (2012) Contribution analysis: Coming of age?Evaluation18(3): 270–280.
28.
MelkoteSRSteevesHL (2015) Communication for Development: Theory and Practice for Empowerment and Social Justice, 3rd edLondon: Sage.
29.
MistryJBignanteEBerardiA (2016) Why are we doing it? Exploring participant motivations within a participatory video project. Area48(4): 412–418.
30.
MorrisN (2003) A comparative analysis of the diffusion and participatory models in development communication. Communication Theory13(2): 225–248.
31.
Noske-TurnerJ (2018) Should the C4D expert survive? Rethinking expertise in communication and innovation. Development in Practice28(3): 444–451.
32.
ParksWGray-FelderDHuntJ, et al. (2005) Who Measures Change? An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change. South Orange, NJ: Communication for Social Change Consortium.
33.
RodríguezC (2011) Citizens’ Media Against Armed Conflict: Disrupting Violence in Colombia. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
34.
ScottM (2017) The myth of representations of Africa. Journalism Studies18(2): 191–210.
35.
ServaesJ (1996) Participatory communication and research in development settings. In: ServaesJJacobsonTLWhiteSA (eds) Participatory Communication for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.13–25.
36.
ServaesJ (2016) How ‘sustainable’ is development communication research?International Communication Gazette78(7): 701–710.
37.
TacchiJA (2009) Finding a voice: Digital storytelling as participatory development. In: HartleyJMcWilliamK (eds) Story Circle: Digital Storytelling Around the World. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp.167–175.
38.
ThomasPN (2014) Development communication and social change in historical context. In: WilkinsKGTufteTObregonR (eds) The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change. Chichester, England: Wiley & Blackwell, pp.7–19.
39.
ThomasPNVan de FliertE (2015) Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change: The Basis for Renewal. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
40.
TufteT (2017) Communication and Social Change: A Citizen Perspective. Cambridge, England: Policy Press.
41.
WagnerPEEllingsonLLKunkelA (2016) Pictures, patience, and practicalities: Lessons learned from using photovoice in applied communication contexts. Journal of Applied Communication Research44(3): 336–342.
42.
WaisbordS (2001) Family Tree of Theories, Methodologies and Strategies in Development Communication. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.
43.
WaisbordS (2015) Three challenges for communication and global social change. Communication Theory25(2): 144–165.
44.
WaisbordS (2019) Communication: A Post-Discipline. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
45.
WhiteSA (ed) (2003) Participatory Video: Images That Transform and Empower. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
WilkinsKGEnghelF (2013) The privatization of development through global communication industries: Living proof? Media. Culture & Society35(2): 165–181.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
