This study clarifies the evolving notion of civic education that resulted from technological advancement. We investigated Singaporean young people's views on civic education by contrasting the roles of schools, families and friends, and social media in shaping their understanding. Through focus groups, we found that there are contentions on the definitions, approaches, and meanings of civic education. We conclude that in view of the inevitable diversity digital technologies tend to present, young people's civic learning might be limited by the pressure and confusion coming along with the exposure to diverse views, the tendency to retreat from formal politics, and the lack of effective school intervention into the social media space.
AmnåEEkmanJ (2014) Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review6(2): 261–281. doi:10.1017/S175577391300009X
2.
BailCAArgyleLPBrownTWBumpusJPChenHHunzakerMFLeeJMannMMerhoutFVolfovskyA (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(37): 9216–9221. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115
3.
BaildonMAlviar-MartinT (2016) Issues-centred global citizenship education in Asia: curricular challenges and possibilities in nation-centric and neoliberal times. Curriculum Perspectives36(2): 65–75.
4.
BennettWL (1998) The uncivic culture: communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics31(4): 741–761. doi:10.1017/S1049096500053270
5.
BennettWL (2012) The personalization of politics: political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science644(1): 20–39. doi:10.1177/0002716212451428
6.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
7.
BuckinghamD (1997) News media, political socialization and popular citizenship: towards a new agenda. Critical Studies in Media Communication14(4): 344–366.
8.
CarrerasMİrepoğluY (2013) Trust in elections, vote buying, and turnout in Latin America. Electoral Studies32(4): 609–619. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.012
9.
ChanHC (1971) Singapore: The Politics of Survival 1965–1967. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChenZChanM (2017) Motivations for social media use and impact on political participation in China: A cognitive and communication mediation approach. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking20(2): 83–90. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0174
11.
ChiaYT (2015) Education, Culture and the Singapore Developmental State: 'World-Soul' Lost and Regained?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
ChiaYT (2016) Singapore General election 2015 and the role of citizenship education. The Round Table105(2): 149–160. doi:10.1080/00358533.2016.1154382
13.
ChiongCGopinathanS (2020) “Being rooted, living global”: citizenship and education in the Singapore city-state. In: PetersonAStahlGSoongH (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67828-3_18.
14.
ChoJShahDVMcLeodJMMcLeodDMSchollRMGotliebMR (2009) Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: advancing an OSROR model of communication effects. Communication Theory19(1): 66–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
15.
ChuaV (2011) Social networks and labour market outcomes in a meritocracy. Social Networks33(1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.08.001
16.
Crick B (2013) In Defence of Politics (2nd ed.). Great Britain Continuum.
17.
DahlgrenP (1986) Beyond information: TV news as cultural discourse. Communications12: 125–136. doi:10.1515/comm.1986.12.2.125
18.
De TocquevilleA. (1984) Democracy in America (HeffnerRichard D., Ed.). New York: Signet Classic.
GirouxHABosioE (2021) Critical pedagogy and global citizenship education. In BosioE (ed) Conversations on Global Citizenship Education. Routledge, pp. 3–12.
21.
GopinathanS (1996) Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education16(1): 74–87. doi:10.1080/02188799608542612
22.
GopinathanS (2012) Are we all global citizens now? Reflections on citizenship and citizenship education in a Globalising world (with special reference to Singapore). https://repository.nie.edu.sg/handle/10497/4716 (accessed 13 January 2022).
23.
GreenA (1997) Education, globalization and the nation state. In Education, Globalization and the Nation State. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 130–186.
24.
Heater D (2004) Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics and Education. Manchester University Press.
25.
HessDEMcAvoyP (2014) The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York & London: Routledge.
JacksonL (2019) The challenges of learning to live together: Navigating the global, national, and local. Asia Pacific Education Review20(2): 249–257. doi:10.1007/s12564-019-09591-3
29.
JohnsonLMorrisP (2010) Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The Curriculum Journal21(1): 77–96. doi:10.1080/09585170903560444
30.
KennedyKJ (2004) Searching for citizenship values in an uncertain global environment. In: LeeWOGrossmanDLKennedyKJFairbrotherGP (eds) Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.9–24.
31.
LeeWO (2013) The development of a future-oriented citizenship curriculum in Singapore: convergence of character and citizenship education and curriculum 2015. In: DengZGopinathanSLeeCK (eds) Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum: From Policy to Curriculum. Singapore: Springer.
32.
LeeWOGrossmanDJKennedyKJFairbrotherGP (eds.) (2004). Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts and Issues. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
33.
PetersJD (1993) Distrust of representation: habermas on the public sphere. Media, Culture & Society15(4): 541–571. doi:10.1177/016344393015004003
34.
Print M and Coleman D (2003). Towards understanding of social capital and citizenship education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(1): 123–149.
35.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36.
ReichertFPrintM (2017) Mediated and moderated effects of political communication on civic participation. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1162–1184. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1218524
37.
Schlozman D and Yohai I (2008) How initiatives don't always make citizens: Ballot initiatives in the American states, 1978–2004. Political Behavior 30(4): 469–489.
38.
ShahDVMcLeodJMYoonSH (2001) Communication, context, and community: an exploration of print, broadcast, and internet influences. Communication Research28(4): 464–506. doi:10.1177/009365001028004005
39.
ShaniG (2020) Identity-politics in the global age. In: ElliottA (ed) Routledge Handbook of Identity Studies. London & New York: Routledge, pp.398–414.
40.
SoonC (2020) IPS Survey on internet and Media use during GE 2020: digital and general divides. Institute of Policy Studies8.
41.
StolleDMichelettiM (2013) Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TakayaK (2017) Citizenship education in Japan: past, present, and future. In: BroomC (ed) Youth Civic Engagement in a Globalized World. New York: Springer, pp.127–144.
Tracy SJ (2019) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
TreviñoEBéjaresCVillalobosCNaranjoE (2017) Influence of teachers and schools on students’ civic outcomes in Latin America. The Journal of Educational Research110(6): 604–618. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1164114
46.
VromenA (2007) Australian Young people's participatory practices and internet use. Information,Community & Society10(1): 48–68.
47.
VromenAXenosMALoaderB (2015) Young people, social media and connective action: from organisational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies18(1): 80–100. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.933198
48.
WestheimerJ (2015) What Kind of Citizen?: Educating our Children for the Common Good. New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
YueANekmatEBetaAR (2019) Digital literacy through digital citizenship: online civic participation and public opinion evaluation of youth minorities in Southeast Asia. Media and Communication7(2): 100–114. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i2.1899
50.
ZhangW. (2012). The effects of political news use, political discussion and authoritarian orientation on political participation: evidences from Singapore and Taiwan. Asian Journal of Communication,22(5), 474–492. doi:10.1080/01292986.2012.701313
51.
ZhangW (2013) Redefining youth activism through digital technology in Singapore. International Communication Gazette75(3): 253–270. doi:10.1177/1748048512472858
52.
ZhangW (2016a) Social media and elections in Singapore: Comparing 2011 and 2015. Chinese Journal of Communication9(4): 367–384. doi:10.1080/17544750.2016.1231129
53.
ZhangW (2016b) The Internet and New Social Formation in China: Fandom Publics in the Making. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
54.
Zhang W and Lallana E (2013) Editorial of “Youth, ICTs, and Civic Engagement in Asia”. International Communication Gazette 75(3): 249–252.
