Innovation and conformity in music reproduction: A network analytics approach to contestants’ song covering in reality shows in Mainland China and the U.S.
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2021
Innovation and conformity in music reproduction: A network analytics approach to contestants’ song covering in reality shows in Mainland China and the U.S.
Contestants in music reality television shows usually cover songs by other singers; however, excessive song covering is seen as a sign of lacking innovation. Informed by frameworks of innovation, conformity, and cultural capital, this study examines the patterns of song covering practice with a network analytics approach by examining the networks formed by the contestants’ song co-covering practices—an edge is created between two contestants if they cover songs from the same original singer—and how contestants’ positions in those networks are related to their performance outcomes. Examining contestants’ co-covering networks on the U.S.’s and mainland China’s versions of The Voice (an international music reality television show), the social network analysis largely supported the conformity hypothesis: contestants were connected to a certain extent, meaning that most contestants covered songs from similar original singers. Contestants’ betweenness centrality was positively associated with performance outcomes.
AbbasiAAltmannJHossainL (2011)
Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics5(4): 594–607.
2.
AppelN (2018)
Pat Boone’s last laugh: Cover versions and the performance of knowledge. International Journal of Cultural Studies21(4): 440–454.
BarabásiA (2012) Network Science (Ch 2. Section 7: Bipartite network. p. 34). Available at: http://networksciencebook.com (accessed 20 April 2021).
6.
BorgattiSP (2005)
Centrality and network flow. Social Networks27(1): 55–71.
7.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
8.
BrockenM (1996)
Some other guys! Some theories about signification: Beatles cover versions. Popular Music & Society20(4): 5–40.
9.
BryanNJWangG (2011). Musical influence network analysis and rank of sample-based music. In: The 12th international society for music information retrieval conference, Miami, Florida, October, pp. 329–334. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/∼njb/research/influence.pdf.
10.
BurkettL (2013). Why ‘The Voice’ is China’s No. 1 TV show – ‘The Voice’ appeals to viewers because of its surprise winners. The Wall Street Journal, 19 September. Available at: www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323981304579081393861908948 (accessed 20 April 2021).
11.
BurtRS (2004)
Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology110(2): 349–399.
12.
ChenJ (2017) Intensifying games: A study of the elimination mechanisms in singing programs in China (2012–2015). Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.
13.
ChenW (2015)
Mediatizing the network model of cultural Capital: Network diversity, media use, and cultural knowledge along and across ethnic boundaries. Social Networks40: 185–196.
14.
ChuYWLeungE (2013)
Remapping Hong Kong popular music: Covers, localisation and the waning hybridity of Cantopop. Popular Music32(1): 65–78.
15.
ContractorNSMongePR (2003, August). Using multi-theoretical multi-level (mtml) models to study adversarial networks. In: R. Brieger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 324–326.
CuiLZhangX (2017)
What happened to those fans several years later?: Empowerment from super girls’ voice for girls in China (2007–2015). Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(4):400–414.
18.
CusicD (2005)
In defense of cover songs. Popular Music and Society28(2): 171–177.
19.
De KloetJ (2005)
Sonic sturdiness: The globalization of “Chinese” rock and pop. Critical Studies in Media Communication22(4): 321–338.
20.
DiMaggioPPowellWW (1983)
The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
21.
DiMaggioPStenbergK (1985)
Why do some theatres innovate more than others? An empirical analysis. Poetics14(1–2): 107–122.
22.
DowdTJLiddleKLupoK, et al. (2002)
Organizing the musical canon: The repertoires of major US symphony orchestras, 1842 to 1969. Poetics30(1–2): 35–61.
23.
ErdosPRényiA (1960)
On the evolution of random graphs. Publication of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences5(1): 17–60.
24.
FergusonJM (2016)
Yesterday once more: Tracking (un) popular music in contemporary Myanmar. Journal of Burma Studies20(2): 229–257.
25.
HavemanHA (1993)
Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets.Administrative Science Quarterly38(4): 593–627.
26.
HimelboimDIGolanGJMoonBB, et al. (2014)
A social networks approach to public relations on Twitter: Social mediators and mediated public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research26(4): 359–379.
27.
Hunter DR, Handcock MS, Butts CT, Goodreau SM and Morris M (2008) ergm: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of statistical software, 24(3), nihpa54860.
JeffcuttPPrattAC (2002)
Managing creativity in the cultural industries. Creativity and Innovation Management11(4): 225–233.
30.
Keane M and Moran A (2008) Television’s new engines. Television & New Media, 9(2), 155–169.
31.
KirschbaumC (2015)
Categories and networks in jazz evolution: The overlap between bandleaders’ jazz sidemen from 1930 to 1969. Poetics52: 154–178.
32.
KrempPA (2010)
Innovation and selection: Symphony orchestras and the construction of the musical canon in the U.S. (1879–1959). Social Forces88(3): 1051–1082.
33.
Lacasse S (2000) Intertextuality and hypertextuality in recorded popular music. In Talbot, M. (Ed.), The musical work: Reality or invention? (pp. 35–58). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
34.
LiaoT (2006) Transplantation and internalization: The study of Taiwanese cover songs between 1950s and 60s. Master Thesis of National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.
PengTQZhangLZhongZ-J, et al. (2013)
Mapping the landscape of internet studies: Textmining of social science journal articles 2000–2009. New Media & Society15(5): 644–664.
44.
PlasketesG (1992)
Like a version: Cover songs and the tribute trend in popular music. Studies in Popular Culture15(1): 1–18.
45.
PlasketesG (2005)
Re‐flections on the cover age: A collage of continuous coverage in popular music. Popular Music and Society28(2): 137–161.
46.
PlasketesG (2010) Introduction: Like a version. In: PlasketesG (ed) Play It Again: Cover Songs in Popular Music.
Farnham, UK; Burlington, VT:
Ashgate.
RafaeliSRavidGSorokaV (2004). De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural Capital. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2004, January, pp. 10. New York, NY: IEEE.
49.
ReissSWiltzJ (2001)
Why America loves reality TV. Psychology Today34(5): 52–54.
50.
RuschR (2013)
Crossing over with brad Mehldau’s cover of radiohead’s “paranoid android”: The role of jazz improvisation in the transformation of an intertext. Music Theory Online19(4).
51.
SerràJZaninMHerreraP, et al. (2012)
Characterization and exploitation of community structure in cover song networks. Pattern Recognition Letters33(9): 1032–1041.
52.
ShiFShiYDokshinFA, et al. (2017).
Millions of online book co-purchases reveal partisan differences in the consumption of science. Nature Human Behaviour1(4): 0079.
53.
Solis G (2010) I did it my way: rock and the logic of covers. Popular Music and Society, 33(3), 297–318.
WangZZZhuJJH (2014)
Homophily versus preferential attachment: Evolutionary mechanisms of scientific collaboration networks. International Journal of Modern Physics C25(5): 1440014.
57.
WattsDJStrogatzSH (1998)
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature393(6684): 440–442.
58.
WuJC (2013)
Cultural citizenship at the intersection of television and new media.Television & New Media14(5): 402–420.
59.
XiaoHF (2012) Androgynous beauty, virtual sisterhood: Stardom, fandom, and Chinese talent shows under globalization. In: DeweySBrinsonKJ (eds) Super Girls, Gangstas, Freeters, and Xenomaniacs: Gender and Modernity in Global Youth Cultures.
Syracuse, NY:
Syracuse University Press, pp. 104–124.
60.
YangJHuangXZhuangD, et al. (2006). The complex network analysis of competitive relationships between manufacturers in Foshan Ceramic Industry cluster. In: 2006 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering. ICMSE'06, October 2006, pp. 1020–1023. New York, NY: IEEE.
61.
YangJLuLXieW, et al. (2007)
On competitive relationship networks: A new method for industrial competition analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications382(2): 704–714.
