Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-8
Ethical perspectives in Latin America’s journalism community: A comparative analysis of acceptance of controversial practice for investigative reporting
Latin Americans are living in an unprecedented era of democracy while experiencing a spike in investigative journalism production. Investigative journalism holds its own conundrums of ethical decision-making related to techniques used and consequences of its content. This study analyzes ethical interpretations in the region’s investigative journalism community through a comparative analysis based on a survey conducted with journalists, journalism educators, and students from 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Our findings highlight the prevalence of a deontological perspective to ethics, with the majority of the respondents rejecting the use of soft-lies as investigative techniques. The study found, however, variability in ethical perspective within Latin America and Caribbean’s geo-cultural regions, with Central America and the Caribbean region leading in opposition and Brazil and the Southern Cone indicating more lenience toward controversial practices. When it comes to source-related controversial techniques, the journalism community in the region overwhelmingly rejects such practices.
AlbarranA (2009) The Handbook of Spanish Language Media, New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
Arrese Á (2006) Reflexiones sobre el buen gobierno corporativo en las empresas periodísticas [Considerations on good corporate governance of media]. DOXA. Revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales 4: 59–81.
5.
BeckerLVladTSimpsonH (2013) 2012 Annual survey of journalism and mass communication enrollments: Enrollments decline for second year in a row. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator68(4): 305–334.
6.
BlázquezN (2000) El Desafío Ético de la InformaciónVol. 20: Madrid: Editorial San Esteban.
ChristiansCG (2007) Utilitarianism in media ethics and its discontents. Journal of Mass Media Ethics22(2–3): 113–131.
9.
DaderJL (2009) Periodismo en la hipermodernidad: Consecuencias cívicas de una identidad débil (y algunas vías de reconstrucción) [Journalism in hypermodernity: Civic consequences of a weak identity (and some routes to rebuild)]. Textual and Visual Media1(2): 147–170.
10.
De BurghH (2000) Investigative Journalism: Context and Practice, New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
DennisEMeyerPSundarS (2003) Learning reconsidered: Education in the digital age. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator57(4): 292–317.
12.
DuYThornburgR (2011) The gap between online journalism education and practice: The twin surveys. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator66(3): 218–230.
13.
FerreiraL (2014) Digital media ethics: Reinventing journalism in Latin America. Hemisphere23(Summer): 17–23.
14.
FoxEWaisbordSR (2002) Latin politics, global media. In: FoxEWaisbordS (eds) Latin Politics, Global Media, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 1–21.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge, MA: University Press.
24.
HanitzschT (2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory17(4): 367–385.
25.
HanitzschTHanuschFMelladoC (2011) Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies12(3): 273–293.
26.
HerscovitzHG (2004) Brazilian journalists’ perceptions of media roles, ethics and foreign influences on Brazilian journalism. Journalism Studies5(1): 71–86.
27.
Higgins Joyce V (2016) Entrepreneurial news as independent voices: Setting a New Agenda in Latin America. In: World Association of Public Opinion Research Latin America, Monterrey, Mexico, 12–14 October 2016.
28.
HoustonB (2010, Spring) The future of investigative journalism. Daedalus153: 45–56.
MelladoC (2012) Major trends of journalist studies in Latin America: A meta-analysis of five decades of research. In: WeaverDWillnatL (eds) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York: NY, Routledge, pp. 413–426.
31.
MelladoCMoreiraSVLagosC (2012) Comparing journalism cultures in Latin America: The case of Chile, Brazil and Mexico. International Communication Gazette74(1): 60–77.
32.
MeyerP (2004) The Vanishing Newspaper. Saving Journalism in the Digital Age, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
33.
NantelJWeeksW (1996) Marketing ethics: Is there more to it than the utilitarian approach?European Journal of Marketing30(5): 9–19.
34.
PattersonPWilkinsL (2005) Media Ethics: Issues and Cases, 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
PerezGJ (1997) Communication ethics in a Latin American Context. In: ChristiansCGTraberM (eds) Communication Ethics and Universal Values, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications, pp. 159–169.
36.
PerkinsM (2002) Freedom of the press in Latin America reconciling societal and individual rights in international law. International Communication Gazette64(1): 5–19.
37.
PicardR (2005) Corporate Governance of Media Companies. JIBS Research Report Series No. 2005-1, Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School Ltd.
38.
PlaisancePL (2014) Media Ethics: Key Principles for Responsible Practice, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
PlaisancePLSkewesEAHanitzschT (2012) Ethical orientations of journalists around the globe implications from a cross-national survey. Communication Research39(5): 641–661.
Requejo-AlemánJLLugo-OcandoJ (2014) Assessing the sustainability of Latin American investigative non-profit journalism. Journalism Studies15(5): 522–532.
42.
Restrepo JD (2000) Dead letter codes. In: Kunczik M (ed) Ethics in Journalism: A Reader on Their Perception in the Third World. Division for International Development Cooperation of Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn. Available at: http://www.fes.de/fulltext/iez/00710b03.htm (accessed 15 August 2016).
43.
RyanM (2009) Research ethics. In: ZhouSSloanD (eds) Research Methods in Communication, Northport, AL: Vision Press, pp. 39–54.
44.
SapiezynskaELagosC (2016) Media freedom indexes in democracies: A critical perspective through the cases of Poland and Chile. International Journal of Communication10: 549–570.
45.
SaxLJGilmartinSKBryantAN (2003) Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education44(4): 409–432.
46.
ScannoneJC (1998) Normas Éticas em la Relación entre Culturas. In: SobrevillaD (ed.) Filosofía de la Cultura, Valladolid, España: Enciclopedia Íbero-americana de Filosofía, Ed. Trotta, pp. 225–241, 280.
SquiresJ (1993) Read All About It: The Corporate Takeover of America’s Newspapers, New York, NY: Times Books.
49.
The Economist (2008) Measuring liberty when freedom stumbles. The Economist. 17 January. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/10534384 (accessed 24 November 2014).
50.
VoakesPS (1997) Social influences on journalists’ decision making in ethical situations. Journal of Mass Media Ethics12(1): 18–35.
51.
VoakesPSBeamROganC (2003) The impact of technological change on journalism education: A survey of faculty and administrators. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator57(4): 318–334.
52.
WaisbordSR (2000) Watchdog Journalism in South America: News, Accountability, and Democracy, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
53.
WardSJA (2005) Philosophical foundations for global journalism ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics20(1): 3–21.
54.
Weaver DH and Wilhoit GC. (1996). The American Journalist in the 1990s: US News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
WeaverDHBeamRBrownleeB (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: US News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
WeaverDWillnatL (2012) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
Zeledón D, Myrara F and Mulet J (2001) Compromiso social de los medios de comunicación por el desarrollo acústicamente sostenible. In: Ponencia Presentada en el V Congreso Latinoamericano de Humanidades: La Ética a Inicios Del Siglo XXI. Granada, Nicaragua, 25–28 September 2001.
