This study seeks to examine the state of investigative journalism practices used in higher education in Latin America. Using a meta-theoretical framework called the Community of Practice (CoP), this study seeks to identify whether a particular learning practice exists in this region. Based on an online survey conducted on Latin American educators and students, several gaps exist between them on the techniques and resources used to learn about investigative journalism. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the CoP approach as well as their impact on the profession and investigative journalism education in the region.
ArreseÁ. (2006). Reflexiones sobre el buen gobierno corporativo en las empresas periodísticas [Considerations on good corporate governance of media]. Doxa Communication, Revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales, 4, 59-81.
2.
ArroyaveJ.BarriosM. M. (2012). Journalists in Colombia. In WeaverD.WilnatL. (Eds.), The Global Journalist in the 21st century (pp. 400-412). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BeckerL.VladT.SimpsonH. (2013). 2012 annual survey of journalism and mass communication enrollments: Enrollments decline for second year in a row. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68, 305-334.
4.
BlomR.DavenportL. (2012). Searching for the core of journalism education: Program directors disagree on curriculum priorities. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67, 70-86.
5.
ClarkL. S. (2013). Cultivating the media activist: How critical media literacy and critical service learning can reform journalism education. Journalism, 14, 885-903.
6.
ClearyJ. (2003). Shaping Mexican journalists: The role of university and on-the-job training. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 58,163-174.
7.
DaderJ. L. (2009). Periodismo en la hipermodernidad: Consecuencias cívicas de una identidad débil (y algunas vías de reconstrucción) [Journalism in hypermodernity: Civic consequences of a weak identity (and some routes to rebuild)]. Textual & Visual Media, 1, 147-170.
8.
DavenportE.HallH. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 171-222.
9.
DavenportL.FicoF.DeFleurM. (2002). Computer-assisted reporting in classrooms: A decade of diffusion and a comparison to newsrooms. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57, 2-22.
DennisE.MeyerP.SundarS.PryorL.RogersE.ChenH.PavlikJ. (2002). Learning reconsidered: Education in the digital age. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57, 292-317.
12.
DeuzeM. (2001). Educating “new” journalists: Challenges to the curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 56, 4-17.
13.
DuY.ThornburgR. (2011). The gap between online journalism education and practice: The twin surveys. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 66, 218-230.
14.
FerreiraL.TillsonD.SalwenM. (2000). Sixty-five years of journalism education in Latin America. Florida Communication Journal, 27, 61-79.
15.
FolkertsJ.HamiltonJ. M.LemannN. (2013). Educating journalists: A new plea for the university tradition (Columbia University Report, Funded by Carnegie Corporation).Columbia University, New York.
García-AvilésJ. A. (2014). Online newsrooms as communities of practice: Exploring digital journalists’ applied ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29, 258-272.
18.
GlasserT. (2006). Journalism studies and the education of journalists. Journalism Studies, 7, 146-149.
19.
HanuschF.MelladoC.BoshoffP.HumanesM. L.LeonS.PereiraF.. . . YezL. (2015). Journalism students’ motivations and expectations of their work in comparative perspective. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 70, 141-160.
20.
HerscovitzH. (2012). Brazilian journalists in the 21st century. In WeaverD.WilnatL. (Eds.), The Global Journalist in the 21st century (pp. 365-381). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
HerscovitzH.CardosoA. M. (1998). The Brazilian journalist. In WeaverD. (Ed.), The Global Journalist: News people around the world (pp. 417-432). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22.
HoustonB. (2010). The future of investigative journalism. Daedalus, 45-56, 153.
IversonJ.McPheeR. (2008). Communicating knowing through communities of practice: Exploring internal communicative processes and differences among CoPs. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 176-199.
26.
KurtzH. (1994). Media circus: The trouble with America’s newspapers. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
27.
MaguireM. (2005). Hidden costs and hidden dangers: Stock options at U.S. newspaper companies. In PicardR. (Ed.), Corporate governance of media companies (pp. 29-45, JIBS Research Report Series No. 2005-1). Jönköping, Sweden: Jönkoping International Business School.
28.
McDevittM.GassawayB. M.PerezF. G. (2002). Teaching civic journalism: Integrating theory and practice. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 55(2), 40-49.
29.
MelladoC. (2012). Major trends of journalist studies in Latin America: A meta-analysis of five decades of research. In WeaverD.WilnatL. (Eds.), The Global Journalist in the 21st century (pp. 413-426). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
MelladoC.MoreiraS. V.LagosC.HernandezM. (2012). Comparing journalism cultures in Latin America: The case of Chile, Brazil, and Mexico. International Communication Gazette, 74, 60-77.
31.
MensingD.RyfeD. (2013). Blueprint for change: From the teaching hospital to the entrepreneurial model of journalism education. International Symposium on Online Journalism, 3(2), 26-44.
32.
MeyerP. (2004). The vanishing newspaper: Saving journalism in the digital age. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
33.
NolanD. (2008). Journalism, education and the formation of “public subjects.”Journalism, 9, 733-749.
34.
PicardR. (Ed.). (2005). Corporate governance of media companies (JIBS Research Report Series No. 2005-1). Jönköping, Sweden: Jönkoping International Business School.
ReeseS. (1999). The progressive potential of journalism education: Recasting the professional versus academic debate. International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(4), 70-94.
38.
Requejo-AlemánJ. L.Lugo-OcandoJ. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of Latin American investigative non-profit journalism. Journalism Studies, 15, 522-532. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.885269
39.
SaxL.GilmartinS.BryantA. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409-432.
40.
Schmitz WeissA.DomingoD. (2010). Innovation processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and communities of practice. New Media & Society, 12, 1156-1171.
41.
SquiresJ. (1993). Read all about it: The corporate takeover of America’s newspapers. New York, NY: Times Books.
42.
VoakesP.BeamR.OganC. (2003). The impact of technological change on journalism education: A survey of faculty and administrators. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57, 318-334.
43.
WaisbordS. R. (1996). Investigative journalism and political accountability in South American democracies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13, 343-363.
44.
WaisbordS. R. (2013). Democracy, journalism, and Latin American populism. Journalism, 14, 504-521.
45.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WilkeJ. (1998). Journalists in Chile, Ecuador and Mexico. In WeaverD. (Ed.), The Global Journalist: News people around the world (pp. 433-452). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
