This essay offers an assessment of Colbert’s satire that situates his practice within the larger theory and history of the genre. My assertion is that satire problematizes notions of certainty, stable reality, and absolute truth. As such, satire enacts a postmodern agenda of freeplay and undecidability. However, many current media critics operate with a modernist view of the genre and of Colbert in particular. Such an approach to satire is inadequate and misconstrues the significance of the form as well as Colbert’s masterly use of it.
BaymG (2010) From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News, Boulder: Paradigm.
2.
BaymG (2007) Representation and the politics of play: Stephen Colbert’s. Better Know a District. Political Communication24: 359–376.
3.
BaymG (2009) Stephen Colbert’s parody of the postmodern. In: GrayJJonesJThompsonE (eds) Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, New York: NYUP, pp. 124–144.
4.
BordenSTewC (2007) The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from “Fake” news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics22(4): 300–314.
5.
BurwellC (2014) Contestation in the Colbert Nation: Participants, producers and the struggle over digital dialogue. International Journal of Cultural Studies17(2): 143–158.
6.
Colbert Nation: Home of The Colbert Report. Comedy Central, n.d. Web. 30 August 2014.
7.
Colbert Super PAC — Mitt Romney Attack Ad. The Colbert Report. Episode #08044. Comedy Central. 16 Jan. 2012. Television.
8.
Colbert PAC — Trevor Potter. The Colbert Report. Episode #07043. Comedy Central. 30 March 2011. Television.
9.
CollettaL (2009) Political satire and postmodern irony in the age of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart. The Journal of Popular Culture42(5): 856–874.
10.
CombeK (2012) Making monkeys of important men: Performance satire and Rochester’s Alexander Bendo’s Brochure. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies12(2): 54–76.
11.
CombeK (1995) The new voice of political dissent: The transition from complaint to satire. In: ConneryBCombeK (eds) Theorizing Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism, New York: St. Martin’s, pp. 73–94.
12.
ComptonJ (2011) Surveying scholarship on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. In: AmarasingamA (ed.) The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 9–23.
13.
ConneryBCombeK (1995) Theorizing satire: A retrospective and introduction. In: ConneryBCombeK (eds) Theorizing Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism, New York: St. Martin’s, pp. 1–14.
14.
DayA (2011) Satire and Dissent: Interventions in Contemporary Political Debate, Bloomington: Indiana UP.
15.
DerridaJ (2000) Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In: KaplanCAndersonW (eds) Criticism: Major Statements, 4th ed. New York: St. Martin’s, pp. 493–510.
16.
FishS (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Cambridge: Harvard UP.
17.
FoucaultM (2003) The subject and power. In: RabinowPRoseN (eds) The Essential Foucault: Selections from The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, New York: New Press, pp. 126–144.
18.
FoucaultM (2003) Truth and power. In: RabinowPRoseN (eds) The Essential Foucault: Selections from The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, New York: New Press, pp. 300–318.
19.
FoxJ (2011) Wise fools: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert as modern-day jesters in the American Court. In: AmarasingamA (ed.) The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 136–148.
20.
FrankfurtH (2005) On Bullshit, Princeton: Princeton UP.
21.
GrayJJonesJThompsonE (2009) The state of satire, the satire of state. In: GrayJJonesJThompsonE (eds) Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, New York: NYUP, pp. 3–36.
22.
GriffinD (1994) Satire: A Critical Reintroduction, Lexington: UP Kentucky.
23.
HardyBGottfriedJWinnegK (2014) Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society17(3): 329–353.
24.
JohnsonD (2009) Colbert, truthiness, and thinking from the gut. In: SchillerA (ed.) Stephen Colbert and Philosophy: I Am Philosophy (And So Can You!), Chicago: Open Court, pp. 3–18.
25.
JonesJ (2010) Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
JonesJBaymG (2010) A dialogue on satire news and the crisis of truth in postmodern political television. Journal of Communication Inquiry34(3): 278–294.
27.
McBethMClemonsR (2011) Is fake news the real news? The significance of Stewart and Colbert for democratic discourse, politics, and policy. In: AmarasingamA (ed.) The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 79–98.
28.
NietzscheF (1979) On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. In: BreazealeD (ed.) Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche's Notebooks of the Early 1870s, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, pp. 79–97.
29.
TiborisMSchaffK (2009) The WØRD: Fearless speech and the politics of language. In: SchillerA (eds) Stephen Colbert and Philosophy: I Am Philosophy (And So Can You!), Chicago: Open Court, pp. 115–130.
30.
TorosyanR (2009) Things that make you go “what?”. In: SchillerA (ed.) Stephen Colbert and Philosophy: I Am Philosophy (And So Can You!), Chicago: Open Court, pp. 29–49.
31.
Troubled GOP Waters & Stephen Under Attack. The Colbert Report. Episode #08047. Comedy Central. 19 Jan. 2012. Television.
Van HeertrumR (2011) Irony and the news: Speaking through cool to American youth. In: AmarasingamA (ed.) The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 117–135.
34.
WaisanenD (2009) A citizen’s guides to democracy inaction: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s comic rhetorical criticism. Southern Communication Journal74(2): 119–140.
35.
WisniewskiK (2011) It’s all about meme: The art of the interview and the insatiable ego of the Colbert Bump. In: AmarasingamA (ed.) The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 164–180.
