Mass media play an important role in explaining the issue of female genital cutting and can influence discourse among the general public as well as policy makers. Understanding how news media present female genital cutting has strong implications for the global status of women. This study, a quantitative content analysis, analyzed how 15 years of newspaper coverage surrounding the launch of the Millennium Development Goals framed female genital cutting in four countries with varying prevalence levels of female genital cutting: the United States, Ghana, The Gambia, and Kenya. The study found female genital cutting is consistently portrayed as a problematic and thematic topic, largely tied to cultural rituals. However, coverage is minimal and inconsistent over time, and does not appear to be impacted by the increase in international initiatives aimed at combatting the practice.
Abu-LughodL (1991) Writing against culture. In: FoxR (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 137–162.
2.
AhmaduF (2001) Rites and wrongs: An insider/outsider reflects on power and excision. In: Shell-DuncanBHernlundY (eds) Female “Circumcision” in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 283–312.
ArbesmanMKahlerLBuckG (1993) Assessment of the impact of female circumcision on the gynecological genitourinary and obstetrical health problems of women from Somalia: Literature review and case series. Women & Health20(3): 27–42.
7.
BehrmanMCanongeJPurcellM (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A look at press coverage of the extractive sector in Nigeria, Ghana and Uganda. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies33(2): 87–99.
8.
BenedictH (1992) Virgin or Vamp: How the Press Covers Sex Crimes, New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BenhabibS (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
10.
BernsN (2001) Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender and Society15(2): 262–281.
11.
BernsN (2004) Framing the Victim: Domestic Violence, Media, and Social Problems, Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
12.
BoddyJ (1998) Violence embodied? Female circumcision, gender politics, and cultural aesthetics. In: DobashR (ed.) Rethinking Violence Against Women, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 77–110.
13.
BoettgerRPalmerL (2010) Quantitative content analysis: Its use in technical communication. Transactions on Professional Communication53(4): 346–357.
14.
Bonino E (2012) Banning female genital mutilation. The New York Times, 20 December.
15.
BonnesS (2013) Gender and racial stereotyping in rape coverage. Feminist Media Studies13(2): 208–227.
16.
BoyleE (2002) Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
ChangTKLeeJ (1992) Factors affecting gatekeepers. Selection of foreign news: A national survey of newspaper editors. Journalism Quarterly69: 554–561.
DalyM (1978) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, Boston: Beacon University Press.
20.
DembourMB (2001) Following the movement of a pendulum between universalism and relativism. In: CowanJDembourMBWilsonR (eds) Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 567–569.
21.
EntmanR (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication41(4): 51–56.
22.
EriksenT (2001) Between universalism and relativism: A critique of the UNESCO concept of culture. In: CowanJDembourMBWilsonR (eds) Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1274–1278.
23.
Fatty F (2010) Gamcotrap advocates for law on FGM. The Daily Observer, 27 September.
24.
Female genital mutilation (2000) Index on Censorship29(2): 73–75.
25.
FiskeSTTaylorSE (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Gbolu F and Jacques J (2005) Female circumcision still going on. Ghanaian Chronicle, 6 July.
27.
Ghanaian Chronicle (2001) How do we end female genital mutilation?Ghanaian Chronicle13 November.
28.
GilboaE (2003) Television news and US foreign policy: Constraints of real time coverage. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8: 97–113.
29.
GruenbaumE (1982) The movement against clitoridectomy and infibulation in Sudan. Medical Anthropology Newsletter13(2): 4–11.
30.
GruenbaumE (2001) The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31.
GunningI (1992) Arrogant perception, world traveling, and multicultural feminism: The case of female genital surgeries. Columbia Human Rights Law Review23(2): 1892–1848.
32.
GunningI (1999) Global feminism at the local level: Criminal and asylum laws regarding female genital surgeries. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice3: 45–62.
33.
HalimSMeyersM (2010) News coverage of violence against Muslim women: A view from the Arabian Gulf. Communication, Culture & Critique3(1): 85–104.
34.
HarpDLokeJBachmannI (2010) Voices of dissent in the Iraq War: Moving from deviance to legitimacy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly87(3/4): 467–483.
35.
IyengarS (1994) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
JamesS (1998) Shades of othering: Reflections on female circumcision/genital mutilation. Signs23(4): 1031–1048.
37.
JamesSRobertsonC (2002) Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing. US Polemics, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
38.
JawoLS (2012) Gamcotrap trains community-based facilitators in Janjangbureh. The Daily Observer14 May.
39.
JohnstonAFriedmanBShaferA (2012) Framing the problem of sex trafficking: Whose problem? What remedy?Feminist Media Studies14(3): 315–332.
40.
KassindjaFBashirL (1998) Do They Hear You When You Cry?, New York: Delacourte Press.
KoriehC (2005) Other’ bodies: Western feminism, race, and representation in female circumcision discourse. In: NnaemekaO (ed.) Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses, Westport, Conn: Praeger, pp. 1113–1114.
43.
Koso-ThomasO (1987) The Circumcision of Women: A Strategy for Eradication, London: Zed Books.
44.
KratzC (1994) Affecting Performance: Meaning, Movement, and Experience in Okiek Women’s Initiation, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
45.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
LeonardL (2000) Interpreting female genital cutting: Moving beyond the impasse. Annual Review of Sex Research11: 158–191.
47.
LevinT (1980) Unspeakable atrocities: The psycho-sexual etiology of female genital mutilation. The Journal of Mind and Behavior1(2): 197–210.
48.
LewisH (1995) Between Irua and ‘female genital mutilation’: Feminist human rights discourse and the cultural divide. Harvard Human Rights Journal8: 1–56.
49.
LewisHGunningI (1998) Cleaning our own house: “Exotic” and familiar human rights violations. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review4: 123–140.
50.
McCombsMShawD (1993) The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication43(2): 58–67.
51.
McManusJDorfmanL (2005) Functional truth or sexist distortion? Assessing a feminist critique of intimate violence reporting. Journalism6(1): 43–65.
52.
MerrySE (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
MeyersM (1997) News Coverage of Violence Against Women, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
54.
MoraTMakipaaL (2008) The unambiguous deviance in a fluid reality: The changing frames of homicide reporting. In: International Communication Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 1–29.
55.
MorganR (1984) Sisterhood is Global: The International Women’s Movement Anthology, New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
56.
MorsyS (1991) Safeguarding women’s bodies: The white men’s burden medicalized. Medical Anthropology Quarterly5: 19–23.
57.
NarayanU (1997) Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism, New York: Routledge.
58.
NarayanU (1998) Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia13(2): 86–106.
59.
NarayanU (2000) Undoing the ‘package picture’ of cultures. Signs25(4): 1083–1086.
60.
Nation (2009) Minority groups condemn unsafe cultural rites. The Nation (Kenya), 16 December.
61.
Ng’Etich P and Omanga B (2001) Girls’ circumcision continues. The Nation (Kenya), 14 December.
62.
Ngobilo E and Ng’etich P (2010) Women’s group saves 100 girls from ‘cut’. The Nation (Kenya), 21 December.
63.
NjambiW (2004) Dualisms and female bodies in representations of African female circumcision: A feminist critique. Feminist Theory5(3): 281–303.
64.
NnaemekaO (2005) Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
65.
ObermeyerCM (1999) Female genital surgeries: The known, the unknown and the unknowable. Medical Anthropology Quarterly13(1): 79–106.
66.
ObermeyerCM (2003) The health consequences of female circumcision: Science, advocacy, and standards of evidence. Medical Anthropology Quarterly17(3): 394–412.
67.
ObioraLA (2005) The anti-female circumcision campaign deficit. In: NnaemekaO (ed.) Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses, Westport, Conn: Praeger, pp. 183–208.
68.
O’HaraS (2012) Monsters, playboys, virgins and whores: Rape myths in the news media’s coverage of sexual violence. Language and Literature21(3): 247–259.
69.
OnyebadiUOyedejiT (2011) Newspaper coverage of post political election violence in Africa: An assessment of the Kenyan example. Media, War & Conflict4(3): 215–230.
70.
PhillipsA (2007) Multiculturalism Without Culture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
PiersR (2002) The CNN Effect: The Myth of News Media, Foreign Policy and Intervention, New York: Routledge.
72.
PiotC (2007) Representing Africa and the Kasinga asylum case. In: HernlundYShell-DuncanB (eds) Transcultural Bodies: Female Genital Cutting in Global Context, New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 157–166.
Pyati A (2011). Female genital cutting. The New York Times, 26 October.
75.
RiffeDFreitagA (1997) A content analysis of content analyses: Twenty-five years of Journalism Quarterly. Journalism and Mass communication Quarterly74: 873–882.
76.
RobertsMWantaWDzwoT (2002) Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research29(4): 452–465.
77.
RobertsonC (2002) Getting beyond the ew! factor: Rethinking U.S. approaches to African female genital cutting. In: JamesSMRobertsonC (eds) Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing U.S. Polemics, Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 54–86.
78.
RogersJ (2007) Managing cultural diversity in Australia: Legislating female circumcision, legislating communities. In: HernlundYShell-DuncanB (eds) Transcultural Bodies: Female Genital Cutting in Global Context, New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 135–156.
79.
ScheufeleD (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society3(2&3): 297–316.
80.
ShahHThorntonM (2004) Newspaper coverage of interethnic conflict: Competing visions of America. The International Journal on Media Management7(1): 94–96.
81.
ShwederRA (2000) What about ‘female genital mutilation?’ And why understanding culture matters in the first place. Daedalus129: 209–232.
82.
SobelM (2014) Chronicling a crisis: Media framing of human trafficking in India, Thailand and the United States. Asian Journal of Communication24(4): 315–332.
83.
SteevesHL (1997) Gender Violence and the Press: The St, Kizito Story. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.
84.
Sunday Nation Correspondent (2000) Prosecute gang over forced cut, says fida. The Nation (Kenya)10. September.
85.
Tall S (2008) FGM/C A Threat to Human Rights and to the Achievement of Millennium Development Goals in Global Consultation on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Technical Report, UNFPA, p. 27.
86.
ToubiaN (1988) Women and health in Sudan. In: ToubiaN (ed.) Women of the Arab World: The Coming Challenge, London: Zed Books, pp. 98–109.
87.
TrippA (2002) Conflicting visions of community and citizenship: Women’s rights and cultural diversity in Uganda. In: MolyneuxMRazaviS (eds) Gender Justice, Democracy and Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–440.
88.
TurnerT (1993) Anthropology and multiculturalism: What is anthropology that multiculturalists should be mindful of it?Cultural Anthropology8(4): 4112–4119.
United Nations (2000) United Nations millennium development goals. Available at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (accessed 21 September 2013).
91.
Van der KwaakA (1992) Female circumcision and gender identity: A questionable alliance. Social Science and Medicine35(6): 777–787.
92.
VolppL (2001) Feminism versus multiculturalism. The Columbia Law Review101: 1181–1218.
93.
WadeL (2009) Defining gendered oppression in U.S. newspapers: The strategic value of ‘female genital mutilation’. Gender & Society23(3): 293–314.
94.
WadeL (2011) Learning from ‘female genital mutilation’: Lessons from 30 years of academic discourse. Ethnicities12(1): 26–49.
95.
WalleyC (1997) Searching for ‘voices’: Feminism, anthropology, and the global debate over female genital operations. Cultural Anthropology12(3): 4053–4058.
96.
WalleyC (2002) Searching for “voices”: Feminism, anthropology, and the global debate over female genital operations. In: JamesSMRobertsonC (eds) Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing U.S, Polemics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 17–53.
97.
WarnkeG (2005) Race, gender, and antiessentialist politics. Signs31(1): 93–116.
98.
WileyD (1997) Academic analysis and U.S. policy-making on Africa: Reflections and conclusions. ISSUE: A Journal of Opinion19(2): 38–48.
99.
WilliamsGIH (2006) Liberia: The Heart of Darkness, Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing.
ZamyatinD (2008) Nostalgia territory (geographical image of Russia and the problems of language identity in the former republics of the USSR). Social Sciences39(3): 76–85.
