4-1-9 is a multi-billion-dollar international email scam that is believed to have originated from Nigeria. This study examines the framing of email communications used in this fraud and content-analyzes their lexical features. Findings indicate that the scammers used Realism as the main persuasive lexical characteristic in the messages, that is, language that suggests meeting tangible needs in people’s everyday lives. The scammers also framed their messages as ‘business’ proposals to disguise their fraudulent tactics and plans. But while the scam may have originated from Nigeria, it appears that it may no longer be operationally restricted to that country.
AkinladejoOH (2007) Advance fee fraud: Trends and issues in the Caribbean. Journal of Financial Crime14(3): 320–339.
2.
BerelsonBR (1952) Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.
3.
BlighMCKohlesJCMeindlJR (2004) Charting the language of leadership: A methodological investigation of President Bush and the Crisis of 9/11. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 562–574.
4.
BryantJMironD (2004) Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication54(4): 662–704.
5.
BuchananJGrantAJ (2001) Investigating and prosecuting Nigerian fraud. United States Attorneys’ Bulletin49(6): 39–47.
6.
Central Bank of Nigeria (n.d.) Don’t be fooled! Many have lost money!! If it sounds too good to be true, it is not true!!! Press release. Available at: www.nigeriaembassyusa.org/fraud.shtml.
7.
ChangJJS (2008) An analysis of advance fee fraud on the internet. Journal of Financial Crime15(1): 71–81.
8.
ChawkiM (2009) Nigeria tackles advance fee fraud. Journal of Information, Law and Technology1(1): 1–20.
9.
CorsunA (1998) Nigerian advance fee fraud. Issues in Global Crime. United States Department of State Bureau of Diplomatic Security, pp. 34–57. Available at: www.docstoc.com/docs/5976690/Issues-in-Global-Crime(accessed 3 February 2010).
10.
De VreeseCHPeterJSemetkoHA (2001) Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication18(2): 107–122.
11.
Diction User Manual (2000) Diction 5.0, the Text Analysis Program: User’s Manual. Austin, TX: Digitext Inc.
12.
DiefendbachDL (2001) Historical foundations of computer-assisted content analysis. In: WestMD (ed.) Theory, Method, and Practice in Computer Content Analysis. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing, pp. 12–35.
13.
DimitrovaDV (2006) Episodic frames dominate early coverage of Iraq war in NYtimes.com. Newspaper Research Journal27(1): 79–83.
EdelsonE (2003) The 419 scam: Information warfare on the spam front and a proposal for local filtering. Computer and Security22(5): 392–401.
16.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication41(1): 6–27.
17.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20(4): 415–432.
18.
FrenchHW (2004) A Continent for the Taking: The Tragedy and Hope of Africa. New York: Knopf.
19.
GamsonWA (1992) Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GlickmanH (2005) The Nigerian ‘419’ advance fee scams: Prank or peril?Canadian Journal of African Studies39(3): 460–489.
21.
GraberDA (2002) Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
22.
HartRP (1984) Verbal Style and the Presidency: A Computer-Based Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
23.
HartRP (2001) Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In: WestM (ed.) Theory, Method and Practice of Computer Content Analysis. New York: Ablex, pp. 44–60.
24.
HartRPChildersJP (2004) Verbal certainty in American politics: An overview and extension. Presidential Studies Quarterly34(3): 516–534.
25.
HoltTJGravesDC (2007) A qualitative analysis of advance fee fraud e-mail schemes. International Journal of Cyber Criminology1(1): 137–154.
26.
IyengarS (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
JarvisS (2004) Partisan patterns in presidential campaign speeches, 1948–2000. Communication Quarterly52(4): 403–419.
LoomisDMeyerP (2000) Opinion without polls: Finding a link between corporate culture and public journalism. International Journal of Public Opinion Research12(3): 278–284.
30.
LowryDT (2008) Network TV news framing of good vs. bad economic news under Democrat and Republican presidents: A lexical analysis of political bias. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly85: 483–498.
31.
LowryDTNaserMA (2010) Lexical characteristics of winning versus losing campaign commercials: An exploratory analysis of campaign ’08. In: Annual Convention of the American Academy of Advertising, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March.
32.
MalgwiCA (2004) Fraud as economic terrorism: The efficacy of the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. Journal of Financial Crime12(2): 144–164.
33.
OkogbuleNS (2007) Official corruption and the dynamics of money laundering in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Crime14(1): 49–63.
34.
OriolaTA (2005) Advance fee fraud on the Internet. Nigeria’s regulatory response. Computer Law and Security Report21: 237–248.
RiffeDLacySFicoFG (2005) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
RodneyW (1981) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, rev edn. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
38.
RosenbergE (2005) Many in U.S. fall for Nigerian e-mail scams. Orlando Sentinel, 13November. Available at: articles.orlandosentinel.com/2005-11-13/news/EMAILSCAM13_1_e-mail-scams-419-scam-internet-fraud.
39.
RosenbergE (2007) U.S. Internet fraud at all-time high/‘Nigerian’ scam and other crimes cost $198.4 million. Hearst Newspapers, 31 March. Available at: articles.sfgate.com/2007-03-31/news/17237626_1_african-official-scam-internet-fraud.
40.
ScottW (1955) Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly19(3): 321–325.
