Through content analysis of Google Zeitgeist’s monthly top 10 lists from countries around the world, this study investigated global Internet search patterns that, in effect, let the public speak for itself rather than answer questions about interests and agendas in a solicited manner. These lists were examined within the context of political differences (free, partially free and not free, determined by the Freedom House Country Ratings), socioeconomic differences (high SES, medium SES and low SES, determined by GDP per capita) and cultural differences (masculine, mixed and feminine, based on Hofstede’s cultural gender index). Statistical differences emerged in the SES and culture categories, while the political category did not yield sufficient data for formal analysis. This new, naturalistic approach to understanding the public stands to increase in relevance and precision as the number of global Internet users and concomitant availability of user data continue to grow.
Abbott J. ( 2001) Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly22(1): 99-114.
2.
Akdeniz Y. ( 2002) Anonymity, democracy, and cyberspace (Part V: Democratic process and non-public politics). Social Research69(1): 223-238.
3.
Akhavan-Majid R. ( 2004) Mass media reform in China: Toward a new analytical framework . International Communication Gazette66(6): 553-565.
4.
Bardoel J. ( 2002) The internet, journalism and public communication policies . International Communication Gazette64(5): 501-511.
5.
Bishop A. ( 2000) Technology literacy in low-income communities. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy43(5): 473-475.
6.
Bond M. and Smith P. ( 1996) Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology . Annual Review of Psychology47: 205-235.
7.
Browning J. ( 1995) Europeans on-line. Scientific American272(5): 35.
8.
Chau P., Cole M., Massey A., Montoya-Weiss M. and O’Keefe R. ( 2002) Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers: Understanding how different cultures use the net - as well as perceive the same web sites - can translate to truly global e-commerce. Communications of the ACM45(10): 138-143.
9.
Cho B., Kwon U., Gentry J., Jun S. and Kropp F. ( 1999) Cultural values reflected in theme and execution: A comparative study of US and Korean television commercials. Journal of Advertising18(4): 59-73.
10.
Choi SM and La Ferle C. ( 2004) Convergence across American and Korean young adults: Socialisation variables indicate the verdict is still out. International Journal of Advertising23(4): 479-506.
11.
CIA. (2004) CIA World Factbook. Available at: www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html
12.
Cotton S. and Gupta S. ( 2004) Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science and Medicine59(9): 1795-1806.
13.
Davies I. and Corbett G. ( 1997) A cross-cultural study of colour grouping: Evidence for weak linguistic relativity. British Journal of Psychology88(3): 493-517.
14.
Dedrick D. ( 1998) Culture in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences21(4): 571-572.
15.
Dimitrova DV and Beilock R. ( 2005) Where freedom matters: Internet adoption among the former Socialist countries. International Communication Gazette67(2): 172-187.
16.
Freedom House. (2004) Map of Freedom. Available at: www.freedomhouse.org/pdf_docs/research/freeworld/2004/map2004.pdf
17.
Gettelman A. ( 2003) The ‘information divide’ in the climate sciences . Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society84(12): 1656-1663.
18.
Google Worldwide. (2004) Google Worldwide: Languages and Countries. Available at: c.asselin.free.fr/french/googleworldwide.htm.
19.
Hofstede G. ( 1998) Masculinity and Femininity: The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
20.
Hofstede G. and Hofstede GJ ( 2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Holstius K. ( 1995) Cultural adjustment in international technology transfer . International Journal of Technology Management10(7): 676-686.
22.
Howard P., Rainee L. and Jones S. ( 2001) Days and nights on the internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 383-404.
23.
Inglehart R. and Baker W. ( 2000) Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of. traditional values. American Sociological Review65(1): 19-51.
24.
Jordan T. ( 2001) Language and libertarianism: The politics of cyberculture and the culture of cyberpolitics. The Sociological Review49(1): 1-17.
25.
Kedia B. and Bhagat R. ( 1988) Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management . Academy of Management Review13(4): 559-571.
26.
Kleiner K. ( 1997) But who guards the guards? Makers of internet censors . New Scientist153(2075): 50.
27.
Lee B., Lancendorfer K. and Lee KJ ( 2005) Agenda-setting and the internet: The intermedia influence of internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea. Journal of Communication15(1): 57-71.
28.
Ludford PJ ( 2005) One-Way ANOVA. Available at: www.-users.cs.umn.edu/∼ludford/Stat_Guide/One_way_ANOVA.htm.
29.
Lynch P. and Beck J. ( 2001) Profiles of internet buyers in 20 countries: Evidence for region-specific strategies. Journal of International Business Studies32(4): 725-748.
30.
McCombs ME and Shaw DL ( 1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176-187.
31.
McGuire J. ( 1999) When speech is heard around the world: Internet content regulation in the United States and Germany. New York University Law Review74(3): 750-792.
32.
Min Y. ( 2004) Campaign agenda formation: The news media in the Korean congressional election of 2000. Asian Journal of Communication14(2): 192-204.
33.
Mohr J. ( 1998) Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 345-370.
34.
Ofori-Dankwa J. and Tierman A. ( 2002) The effect of researchers’ focus on interpretation of diversity data. Journal of Social Psychology142(3): 277-293.
35.
Sheafer T. and Weimann G. ( 2005) Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections . Journal of Communication55(2): 347-365. .
36.
Sonaike SA ( 2004) The internet and the dilemma of Africa’s development . International Communication Gazette66(1): 41-61.
37.
Soroka SN ( 2002) Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Toronto: UBC Press.
38.
Spink A., Wolfram D., Jansen M. and Saracevic T. ( 2001) Searching the web: The public and their queries . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(3): 226-234.
39.
Sullivan D. ( 2004) Nielsen NetRatings Search Engine Ratings. Available at: searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156451 .
40.
Tanner E. ( 1999) Links to the world: The internet in Chile, 1983-97 . International Communication Gazette61(1): 39-57.
41.
Thomas J. ( 2000) Liberal machines. American Behavioral Scientist43(9): 1548-1550.
42.
Tolbert C. and McNeal R. ( 2003) Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation ? Political Research Quarterly56(2): 175-185.
43.
Wanta W. ( 1992) Influence of the president on the news media and public agendas. Mass Communication Review19(3): 14-22.
44.
Wanta W., Golan G. and Lee C. ( 2004) Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly81(2): 364-377.
45.
Wasserman I. and Richmond-Abbott M. ( 2005) Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly86(1): 252-270.
46.
Weaver D. ( 1991) Issue salience and public opinion: Are there consequences of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research3(1): 53-68.
47.
Weaver D. ( 1994) Media agenda setting and elections: Voter involvement or alienation? Political Communication11(4): 347-356.
48.
Worf R. ( 2002) Speaking out: The internet in China. Harvard International Review23(4): 7-8.
49.
Xu Y., Chu LL and Zhongshi G. ( 2002) Reform and challenge: An analysis of China’s journalism education under social transition. International Communication Gazette64(1): 63-77.
