This article explores issues related to the digitization of traditional knowledge. Using the example of the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) in India, it (1) explores the interfaces between the TKDL and the digital, (2) problematizes the relationship between the TKDL, power and digital knowledge, (3) raises issues around traditional knowledge (TK) and dominant traditions of intellectual property (IP) and (4) explores the status of reinvented traditions in relation to TK. While the article includes an immanent critique of the politics of the digital in relation to the TKDL, it supports the view that the digital can play a significant role in the preservation, elucidation and strengthening of traditional/ indigenous cultures.
Agrawal A. ( 1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change26(3): 413-439.
2.
Agrawal A. ( 2002) Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification . International Social Science Journal54(173): 287-297.
3.
Augusto G. ( 2008) Digitising IKS: Epistemic complexity, datadiversity and cognitive justice. The International Information and Library Review40: 211-218.
4.
Bharucha R. ( 1998) In the Name of the Secular: Contemporary Cultural Activism in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bowker G. ( 2000) Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science30(5): 643-683.
6.
Brown D. ( 2007) Te Ahua Hiko: Digital cultural heritage and indigenous objects, people and environments. In: Cameron F and Kenderdine S (eds) Theorising Digital Cultural Heritage. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, 77-91.
7.
Brown M. ( 1998) Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology39(2): 193-222.
8.
Coombe R. ( 1998) Commentary on Michael Brown’s ‘Can culture be copyrighted?’39(2): 207-209.
9.
Das AK, Sen BK and Dutta C. ( 2005) Digitization of scholarly materials in India for distance and open learners. Paper presented at ICDE International Conference, New Delhi, 19-23 November, 1-11.
10.
Garcia Canclini N. ( 1993) Transforming Modernity: Popular Culture in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11.
Garcia Canclini N. ( 1997) Hybrid cultures and communicative strategies. Media Development44(1): 22-29.
12.
Hodge A. ( 2009) India acts to keep tradition safe for all. The Australian, 24 February.
13.
Joseph S. ( 1991) Culture and political analysis in India. Social Scientist19(10-11): 48-62.
14.
Kothari A. ( 2008) Knowledge documentation: Kiss of death, or new lease of life. Infochange Environment, May. Available at: infochangeindia.org/200805057119/Environment/Analysis/Knowledge-documentation-Kiss-of-death-or-new-lease-of-life.html .
15.
Lewis J. and Tricia Fragnito S. ( 2005) Aboriginal territories in cyberspace. Cultural Survival Quarterly29(1). Available at: www.culturalsurvival.org/ourpublications/csq/article/aboriginal-territories-cyberspace
16.
Li X. and Li W. ( 2007) Inadequacy of patent regime on traditional medicinal knowledge: A diagnosis of 13-year traditional medicinal knowledge patent experience in China. The Journal of World Intellectual Property10(2): 125-148.
17.
Lightbourne M. ( 2003) Of rice and men: An attempt to assess the basmati affair . The Journal of World Intellectual Property6(6): 875-894.
18.
Lutz EL ( 2005) The many meanings of technology. Cultural Survival Quarterly29(1). Available at: www.culturalsurvival.org/ourpublications/csq/article/the-many-meanings-technology
19.
Madan TN ( 1991) Secularism in its place. In: Madan TN (ed.) Religion in India. New Delhi : Oxford University Press, 394-409.
20.
Mittal R. and Mahesh G. ( 2008) Digital libraries and repositories in India: An evaluative study. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems42(3): 286-302.
21.
Moahi KH ( 2007) Copyright in the digital era and some implications for indigenous knowledge. In: Mazonde I and Thomas PN (eds) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Intellectual Property in the Twenty-First Century: Perspectives from Southern Africa. Dakar: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa in association with the University of Botswana and WACC, 66-77.
22.
Nandy A. ( 1990) The politics of secularism and the recovery of religious tolerance. In: Das V (ed.) Mirrors of Violence: Communities, Riots and Survivors in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 69-93.
23.
Oguamanam C. ( 2004) Localising intellectual property in the globalisation epoch: The integration of indigenous knowledge. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies11(2): 135-169.
24.
Oguamanam C. ( 2008a) Patents and traditional medicine: Digital capture, creative legal interventions, and the dialectics of knowledge transformation. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies15(2): 489-528.
25.
Oguamanam C. ( 2008b) Local knowledge as trapped knowledge: Intellectual property, culture, power and politics. The Journal of World Intellectual Property11(1): 29-57.
26.
Osborne SD(2003-4) Protecting tribal stories: The perils of propertization. American Indian Law Review28(1): 203-236.
27.
Padma TV ( 2005) Digital library to protect indigenous knowledge. Science and Development Network News, 10 January.
28.
Poole P. ( 1994) Geomatics: Who needs it?Cultural Survival Quarterly18(4). Available at: www.culturalsurvival.org/ourpublications/csq/article/geomatics-who-needs-it
29.
Reddy S. ( 2006) Making heritage legible: Who owns traditional medical knowledge? International Journal of Cultural Property13(2): 161-188.
30.
Rowe W. and Schelling V. ( 1991) Memory and Modernity: Popular Culture in Latin America . London and New York: Verso.
31.
Thomas PN ( 2009) Bhoomi, Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India. Telematics and Informatics26(1): 20-31.
32.
Udgaonkar S. ( 2002) The recording of traditional knowledge: Will it prevent bio-piracy. Current Science82(4): 413-419.
33.
Verma SK ( 2004) Protecting traditional knowledge: Is a sui generis system an answer? The Journal of World Intellectual Property7(6): 765-805.
