The study deals with a gradually deteriorating system such as a large structure. This system is studied over a finite time span where the finite horizon can be seen, for example, as an insurance deadline which requires a specific maintenance policy. Maintenance actions are assumed to be imperfect in this work. An improvement function is used to model the impact of the maintenance on the degradation level of the system. The improvement function is based in the virtual age model ARA1. A maintenance policy is then proposed in which maintenance actions are systematically performed at given maintenance dates, if the system has not already failed. It is assumed that in the event of a failure the system is not repaired. The system is then unavailable until the finite horizon. The proposed maintenance policy is assessed on the finite time span, and both maintenance dates and the number of maintenance actions are optimized.
NicolaiR. P.FrenkJ. B. G.DekkerR.Modelling and optimizing imperfect maintenance of coatings on steel structures. Struct. Saf., 2009, 31, 234–244.
2.
JiaY.ChenX.Scheduling the imperfect preventive maintenance policy for deteriorating systems. Modelling in Industrial Maintenance and Reliability, Manchester, UK 10-11September, 2007.
3.
KijimaM.NakagawaT.Accumulative damage shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance. Naval Res. Logist., 1991, 38, 145–156.
4.
KijimaM.NakagawaT.Replacement policies for a shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1992, 57, 100–110.
PhamH.WangH.Imperfect maintenance. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1996, 94, 425–438.
7.
PonchetA.FouladiradM.GrallA.Imperfect condition-based maintenance on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system. In European Safety and Reliability Conference, Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 7-10 September, 2009.
8.
NakagawaT.MizutaniS.A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval. Reliab. Engng Sys. Saf., 2009, 94, 89–96.
9.
GrallA.DieulleL.BerenguerC.RoussignolM.Continuous time predective maintenance scheduling for a detetiorating system. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 2002, 51(2), 141–150.
10.
ZequeiraR. I.BérenguerC.Periodic imperfect maintenance with two categories of competing failure modes. Reliab. Engng Sys. Saf., 2006, 91, 460–468.
MarquezA. C.HeguedasA. S.Models for maintenance optimization: a study for repairable systems and finite time periods. Reliab. Engng Sys. Saf., 2002, 75, 367–377.
DaggR. A.Optimal inspection and maintenance for stochastically deteriorating systems. PhD Thesis, The City University, London, UK, 1999.
15.
ÇinlarE.BažantZ. P.OsmanE.Stochastic process for extrapolating concrete creep. J. Engng Mech., 1977, 103(6), 1069–1088.
16.
FrangopolD. M.KallenM. J.van NoortwijkJ. M.Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Prog. Struct. Engng Mater., 2004, 6(4), 197–212.
17.
van NoortwijkJ. M.A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2009, 94, 2–21.
18.
JiangR.An accurate approximate solution of optimal sequential age replacement policy for a finite-time horizon. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2009, 94, 1245–1250.
19.
NakagawaT.YasuiK.SandohH.Note on optimal partition problems in reliability models. J. Qual. Mainten. Engng, 2004, 10(4), 282–287.
20.
DaiT.QiX.An acquisition policy for a multi-supplier system with a finite-time horizon. Comput. Oper. Res., 2007, 34, 2758–2773.
21.
NielsenL. R.KristensenA. R.Finding the k best policies in a finite-horizon Markov decision process. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2006, 175, 1164–1179.
22.
JayabalanV.ChaudhuriD.An heuristic approach for finite time maintenance policy. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1992, 27, 251–256.
23.
LieC. H.ChunY. H.An algorithm for preventive maintenance policy. IEEE Trans. on Reliab., 1986, 35, 71–75.
24.
KijimaM.MorimuraM.SuzukiY.Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1988, 37, 194–203.
25.
van der WeideJ. A. M.PandeyM. D.van Noort-wijkJ. M.Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization. Reliab. Engng Sys. Saf., 2010, 95, 236–246.
26.
Meier-HirmerC.RibouletG.SourgetF.RoussignolM.Maintenance optimization for a system with a gamma deterioration process and intervention delay: application to track maintenance. J. Risk and Reliab., 2009, 223(3), 189–198.
27.
BlainC.BarrosA.GrallA.LefebvreY.Modelling of stress corrosion cracking with stochastic processes - application to steam generators. In Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, Stavanger, Norway, 25-27 June 2007, vol. 3, pp. 2395–2400 (Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK).
