Explosives, weapons of mass destruction and other contraband smuggled via cargo containers present a significant threat to national security. To combat this threat cargo containers are inspected for various types of contraband upon entering the country. This article presents a genetic algorithm-based technique for developing an optimum inspection strategy capable of detecting two different types of contraband. Experimentation on the behavior of the optimization algorithm is presented, demonstrating how this technique can be used to optimize an inspection strategy for detecting chemical explosives and radiological material, the components of either a nuclear or “dirty” bomb.
RosoffHVon WinterfeldtD. a risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Risk Analysis2007; 27(3): 533–546.
5.
BasrurRMSteinhäuslerF. Nuclear and radiological terrorism threats for india: risk potential and countermeasures. J Physical Security2004; 1(1): 1–15.
6.
MeadeCMolanderRC. Considering the effects of a catastrophic terrorist attack. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy, 2006.
7.
1107th Congress. Maritime Transportation Security Act. Public Law 107-295, 2002.
8.
109th Congress. Security and Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act. Public Law No, 109-347, 2006.
9.
110th Congress. Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007. Public Law No: 110-53, 2007.
10.
CirincioneRCosmasALowC. Barriers to the success of 100% maritime cargo container scanning. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Report No. ESD-WP-2007-05, 2007.
11.
PriceW. Reducing the risk of terror events at seaports. Rev Policy Res2004; 21(3): 329–349.
12.
MayMMWilkeningDPutnamTL. Detecting nuclear material in international container shipping: criteria for secure systems. J Physical Security2004; 1(1): 1–28.
OgorodnikovSPetruninV. Processing of interlaced images in 4–10 MeVdual energy customs system for material recognition. Physical Review Special Topics – Accelerators and Beams2002; 5: 1–11.
15.
LeeKHashimotoEYamamotoT. Design and experiment of dual-energy X-ray material recognition using a 950 keV X-band Linac. Nuc Instr Methods Physics Res A2011; 637(1): 54–56.
16.
JamesKAde Sulima-PrzyborowskiJCHaydnNTA. Non-invasive means of investigating container contents for customs agents at port. Los Angeles, CA: White Paler, 2002.
17.
OrphanVMuenchauEGormleyJ. Advanced gamma ray technology for scanning cargo containers. Applied Radiation and Isotopes2005; 63: 723–732.
18.
LiuaYSowerBDTickneraJR. Comparison of neutron and high-energy X-ray dual-beam radiography for air cargo inspection. Applied Radiation and Isotopes2008; 66: 463–473.
19.
SinghSSinghM. Explosives detection systems (EDS) for aviation security. Signal Process2003; 83: 31–55.
20.
BufflerA. Contraband detection with fast neutrons. Radiation Physics Chem2004; 71: 853–861.
21.
GozaniT. The role of neutron based inspection techniques in the post 9/11/01 era. Nuc Instr Methods Physics Res B2004; 213: 460–463.
22.
HallJ. The nuclear car wash: neutron interrogation of cargo containers to detect hidden SNM. Instr Methods Physics Res2007; 261: 337–340.
23.
SmithRCHurwitzMJTranK.-C. System to detect contraband in cargo containers using fast and slow neutron irradiation and collimated gamma detectors. Nuc Instr Methods Physics Res B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 5May1995; 99(1–4): 733–735.
24.
Janssens-MaenhouGDe RoobFJanssensW. Contributing to shipping container security: can passive sensors bring a solution?J Enviro Radioactivity2010; 101(2): 95–105.
25.
MukherjeeBLambertJHentschelR. A cost effective, highly sensitive, passive neutron fluence monitor for nuclear contraband detection. Nuc Instr Methods Physics Res A, 652(1): 408–411.
26.
KouzesRTSicilianoERElyJH. Passive neutron detection for interdiction of nuclear material at borders. Nuc Instr Methods Physics Res A2008; 584(2–3): 383–400.
27.
RondeshagenDArnoldGBockischS. Trace and bulk detection of explosives by ion mobility spectrometry and neutron analysis. In: SchubertHKuznetsovA (eds) Detection of liquid explosives and flammable agents in connection with terrorism. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008, pp.123–132.
28.
SinghMS. Explosives detection systems (EDS) for aviation security. Signal Process2003; 83: 31–55.
National Research Council. Existing and potential standoff explosives detection techniques. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
31.
WeinLMWilkinsAHBavejaM. Preventing the importation of illicit nuclear materials in shipping containers. Risk Analysis2006; 26(5): 1377–1393.
32.
LongoF. Design and integration of the containers inspection activities in the container terminal operations. Int J Prod Econ2010; 125(2): 272–283.
33.
StroudPDSaegerKJ. Enumeration of increasing Boolean expressions and alternative digraph implementations for diagnostic applications. In: Proceedings of computer, communication and control technologiesVol. IV (ed. ChuH), Orlando, FL, 2Aug2003, pp.328–333. International Institute of Informatics and Systematics, LAUR-03-3384.
34.
AnandSMadiganDMammoneR. Experimental analysis of sequential decision making algorithms for port of entry inspection procedures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics, ISI 2006, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–24 May 2006, pp.319–330. Berlin: Springer.
35.
MadiganDMittalSRobertsF. Sequential decision making of entry inspection: Overcoming computational challenges. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics, 23–24 May 2007, pp.1–7. Piscataway: IEEE Press. Product Type: Conference Publications
36.
ElsayedEAYoungCMXieM. Point of entry inspection: sensor deployment policy optimization. Working paper. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, New Brunswick, NJ, April 2009; 6(2): 265.
37.
BorosEFedzhoraLKantorPB. A large-scale linear programming model for finding optimal container inspection strategies. Naval Res Logistics2009; 56(5): 404–420.
KantorPBorosE. Deceptive detection methods for effective security with inadequate budgets: the testing power index. Risk Analysis2010; 30(4): 663–673.
40.
Ramirez-MarquezJE. Port-of-entry safety via the reliability optimization of container inspection strategy through an evolutionary approach. Rel Engng Syst Saf2008; 93(11): 1698–1709.
41.
Van WeeleSFRamirez-MarquezJE. Optimization of container inspection strategy via a genetic algorithm. Ann Ops Res, 187(1); July2011: 229–247.
42.
ConchoALRamirez-MarquezJE. An evolutionary algorithm for port-of-entry security optimization considering sensor thresholds. Rel Engng Syst Saf2010; 95: 255–266.
43.
WickensTD. Elementary signal detection theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
44.
SrinivasMPatnaikL.M. Genetic algorithms: a survey. Computer1994; June: 27(6): 17–26.
45.
FogelD. An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Neural Networks1994; January: 5(1): 3–14.
46.
CaamanoPBellasFBecerraJ.A.. Application domain study of evolutionary algorithms in optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, Atlanta, GA, ACM New York, NY, USA2008, pp.495–502. USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-60558-130-9
