This study examined sex differences in perceptual acuity ability, quantified via the just-noticeable difference approach (JND), through
O2 kinetics expressed relative to individual
O2max, their relationship to time perception, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), speed, and heart rate (HR) in recreational runners. Sixty-four runners (Females: n = 30,
O2max = 48.0 ± 5.2 ml·kg−1·min−1; Males: n = 34,
O2max = 57.0 ± 5.6 ml·kg−1·min−1) completed a maximal estimation trial and four 5-min JND bouts at 70%
O2max, designed to quantify the
O2 difference during the final 30 s between each JND bout and the preceding standard stimulus at intensities perceived as just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the reference exertion.
O2-time trajectories were modeled with generalized additive models; secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated-measures ANOVA. No sex differences emerged in total JND magnitude (Females: 6.83 ± 3.69%
O2max; Males: 6.23 ± 2.82%
O2max; d = 0.182) or time perception (η2p = 0.009). Females exhibited higher
O2 (+3.54%
O2max) and distinct
O2-time trajectories. Independent of sex, JND-A elicited a greater magnitude of change than JND-B: higher relative
O2, RPE (Δ = 1.31–1.38 a.u.), time perception (Δ = 19–23.5 s), and speed (Δ = 0.096–0.134 m·s−1). HR increased in JND-A for females (Δ=6.03 bpm) but not for males. These findings suggest that recreational runners of both sexes demonstrated comparable perceptual acuity ability, despite distinct relative
O2 responses. At the bout level, our findings indicate an asymmetric self-regulation pattern, with JND-A eliciting greater physiological and perceptual responses than JND-B. Coaches can utilize JND thresholds, which relate to perceptual acuity, to create training programs aimed at supporting interoceptive awareness and exercise intensity regulation in recreational runners.