This study aimed to validate the feasibility of a repetition-based method for adjusting inter-set rest intervals during superset resistance training (RT). Twenty young adults completed three protocols—fixed (3-min rest), self-selected (participant-determined rest), and repetition-based (rest adjusted by prior repetition count)—in randomized order, performing five agonist–antagonist supersets (bench press and bench pull) at 75% 1RM. Results indicated greater repetition volume in later supersets for the self-selected and repetition-based protocols compared to the fixed protocol (F = 2.1, p = 0.037, ωp2 = 0.056). However, blood lactate concentrations were significantly higher in the repetition-based protocol compared to both the self-selected and fixed protocols (F = 7.3, p = 0.002, ωp2 = 0.252). No differences among protocols were found in fastest set velocity or perceived exertion (F = 0.3–2.8, p = 0.077–0.782). Regarding time efficiency, the fixed protocol was most efficient, followed by the repetition-based, with the self-selected protocol being least efficient. These findings indicate that the repetition-based approach offers an effective complementary strategy to traditional fixed and self-selected rest methods, especially in contexts emphasizing mechanical performance and session efficiency.
ZhangXLiHFengS, et al.The effect of various training variables on developing muscle strength in velocity-based training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Sports Med2023; 44: 857–864.
2.
ZhangXLiHBiS, et al.Auto-regulation method vs. Fixed-loading method in maximum strength training for athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol2021; 12: 651112.
3.
ZhangXFengSPengR, et al.The role of velocity-based training (VBT) in enhancing athletic performance in trained individuals: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 9252.
4.
ZhangXFengSLiH. The effect of velocity loss on strength development and related training efficiency: a dose–response meta-analysis. Healthcare2023; 11: 37.
5.
ChungCLHThilarajahSTanD. Effectiveness of resistance training on muscle strength and physical function in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2016; 30: 11–23.
6.
WestcottWL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep2012; 11: 209–216.
7.
KitsudaYWadaTNomaH, et al.Impact of high-load resistance training on bone mineral density in osteoporosis and osteopenia: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Metab2021; 39: 787–803.
8.
JukicICastillaAPRamosAG, et al.The acute and chronic effects of implementing velocity loss thresholds during resistance training: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical evaluation of the literature. Sports Med2023; 53: 177–214.
9.
ZhangXWeakleyJLiH, et al.Superset versus traditional resistance training prescriptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring acute and chronic effects on mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual variables. Sports Med2025; 55: 953–975.
10.
GrgicJSchoenfeldBJSkrepnikM, et al.Effects of rest interval duration in resistance training on measures of muscular strength: a systematic review. Sports Med2018; 48: 137–151.
11.
Ben-AriASilvermanYObolskiU, et al.On your mark, get set, choose! A randomized cross-over study comparing fixed and self-selected rest periods in interval running among professional female soccer players. Sports Med Open2025; 11: 2.
12.
HurleyKSFlippinKJBlomLC, et al.Practices, perceived benefits, and barriers to resistance training among women enrolled in college. Int J Exerc Sci2018; 11: 26.
13.
HoareEStavreskiBJenningsGL, et al.Exploring motivation and barriers to physical activity among active and inactive Australian adults. Sports2017; 5: 47.
14.
SpinneyJMillwardH. Time and money: a new look at poverty and the barriers to physical activity in Canada. Soc Indic Res2010; 99: 341–356.
15.
Scharhag-RosenbergerFMeyerTGäßlerN, et al.Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J Sci Med Sport2010; 13: 74–79.
16.
JanicijevicDMiras-MorenoSMorenas-AguilarMD, et al.Does the length of inter-set rest periods impact the volume of bench pull repetitions completed before surpassing various cut-off velocities?J Hum Kinet2024; 95: 139–150.
17.
do CarmoECDe SouzaEORoschelH, et al.Self-selected rest interval improves vertical jump postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res2021; 35: 91–96.
18.
SimãoRPolitoMFreitas de SallesB, et al.Acute and long-term comparison of fixed vs. Self-selected rest interval between sets on upper-body strength. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: 540–544.
19.
Alonso-AubinDAHernández-LougedoJCavero-HaroA, et al.Acute effect of fixed vs. Self-selected rest interval between sets on physiological and performance-related responses. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol2024; 9: 200.
20.
BartolomeiSFrancescoLLatiniD, et al.Autoregulation does not provide additional benefits to a mixed session periodized resistance training program in trained men. J Strength Cond Res2024; 38: 1535–1542.
21.
HackettDACobleySPDaviesTB, et al.Accuracy in estimating repetitions to failure during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 2162–2168.
22.
CarrollTJTaylorJLGandeviaSC. Recovery of central and peripheral neuromuscular fatigue after exercise. J Appl Physiol2017; 122: 1068–1076.
23.
RahimiR. Effect of different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during squat bouts. J Sports Sci Med2005; 4: 361–366.
24.
WeavilJCAmannM. Neuromuscular fatigue during whole body exercise. Curr Opin Physiol2019; 10: 128–136.
NuzzoJLPintoMDNosakaK, et al.Maximal number of repetitions at percentages of the one repetition maximum: a meta-regression and moderator analysis of sex, age, training status, and exercise. Sports Med2024; 54: 303–321.
28.
WeakleyJCowleyNSchoenfeldBJ, et al.The effect of feedback on resistance training performance and adaptations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2023; 53: 1789–1803.
29.
ZourdosMCDolanCQuilesJM, et al.Efficacy of daily one-repetition maximum training in well-trained powerlifters and weightlifters: a case series. Nutr Hosp2016; 33: 437–443.
30.
PaduloJMignognaPMignardiS, et al.Effect of different pushing speeds on bench press. Int J Sports Med2012; 33: 376–380.
31.
Marcos-FrutosDLebanŽLiZ, et al.The impact of Rhodiola rosea extract on strength performance in alternative bench-press and bench-pull exercises under resting and mental fatigue conditions: a randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Nutrients2025; 17: 40.
32.
LesinskiMPrieskeOGranacherU. Effects and dose–response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2016; 50: 781–795.
33.
SallesDPolitoBFGoesslerMD, , et al.Effects of fixed vs. Self-suggested rest between sets in upper and lower body exercises performance. Eur J Sport Sci2016; 16: 927–931.
34.
JanićijevićDMiras-MorenoSMorenas-AguilarMD, et al.Optimizing mechanical performance in the bench press: the combined influence of inter-set rest periods and proximity to failure. J Sports Sci2023; 41: 2193–2200.
35.
McMahonSJenkinsD. Factors affecting the rate of phosphocreatine resynthesis following intense exercise. Sports Med2002; 32: 761–784.
36.
BogdanisGCNevillMEBoobisLH, et al.Recovery of power output and muscle metabolites following 30 s of maximal sprint cycling in man. J Physiol1995; 482: 467–480.
37.
LopesCRCrispAHSchoenfeldB, et al.Effect of rest interval length between sets on total load lifted and blood lactate response during total-body resistance exercise session. Asian J Sports Med2018; 9: e57500.
