Although the coach–athlete relationship has been widely examined across competitive levels, limited research has focused on its dynamics within elite national team settings. This study explored the coach-athlete relationship in the context of national team coaches participating in major international competitions (e.g., European Championships, World Championships, and Olympic Games). A semi-structured protocol was used to interview 13 elite national team coaches from team and individual sports. A reflexive thematic analysis revealed three higher-order themes: (1) Coaching identities are shaped through experience and transition, highlighting how national team coaches build their profiles through personal pathways, lifelong learning, and relational competence; (2) Constructing performance beyond skill, showing that athlete selection transcends technical-tactical criteria, integrating psychosocial fit and team dynamics; and (3) Navigating connections in high-stakes contexts, illustrating how relational management, closeness, and complementarity influence sports success across competition phases. These findings expand existing knowledge by offering an in-depth understanding of coach-athlete relationship in elite national team settings, emphasising the interplay between individual profiles and relational processes. This study reinforces the importance of relational expertise as a core coaching skill and underlines the value of adaptive leadership in managing interpersonal dynamics. The practical implications include guiding the design of professional development programmes to strengthen interpersonal coaching skills and informing selection and communication strategies within national teams. By addressing a gap in the literature, this study contributes to enhancing the quality of coach–athlete interactions in high-performance environments and offers practical insights for federations, coaching organisations, and sport governing bodies aiming to optimise professional development and team performance.
LyleJCushionC. Sport coaching concepts: A framework for coaching practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2016.
2.
Isoard-GautheurSTrouilloudDGustafssonH, et al.Associations between the perceived quality of the coach–athlete relationship and athlete burnout: an examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 22: 210–217.
3.
DavisLJowettSTafvelinS. Communication strategies: the fuel for quality coach-athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2156.
4.
JowettSChaundyV. An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dyn2004; 8: 302.
5.
HampsonRJowettS. Effects of coach leadership and coach–athlete relationship on collective efficacy. Scand J Med Sci Sports2014; 24: 454–460.
6.
PhillipsKRhindDKrukowskaO, et al.The quality of the coach-athlete relationship predicts objective performance in elite cricket. Int J Sport Psychol2023; 54: 32–47.
7.
GosaiJJowettSNascimento-JúniorJ. When leadership, relationships and psychological safety promote flourishing in sport and life. Sports Coach Rev2023; 12: 145–165.
8.
OlympiouAJowettSDudaJ. The psychological interface between the coach-created motivational climate and the coach-athlete relationship in team sports. Sport Psychol2008; 22: 423–438.
9.
DavisLJowettSLafrenièreM. An attachment theory perspective in the examination of relational processes associated with coach-athlete dyads. J Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 35: 156–167.
10.
PhilippeRSchiavioABiasuttiM. Adaptation and destabilization of interpersonal relationships in sport and music during the COVID-19 lockdown. Heliyon2020; 6: e05212.
11.
JowettSSladeK. Coach-athlete relationships: the role of ability, intentions, and integrity. In: HeaneyCKentzerNOakleyB (eds) Athletic development. London: Routledge, 2021, pp.89–106.
12.
JowettS. Coaching effectiveness: the coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Curr Opin Psychol2017; 16: 154–158.
13.
JowettS. 25 Years of relationship research in sport: the quality of the coach-athlete relationship as defined by closeness, commitment, complementarity and co-orientation (3+1Cs). Psychol Sport Exerc2025; 80: 102909.
14.
CôtéJGilbertW. An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; 4: 307–323.
15.
CôtéJAllanVTurnnidgeJ, et al.Youth talent development. In: HornTSmithA (eds) Advances in sport and exercise psychology. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2019, pp.467–482.
16.
TequesPDuarteDVianaJ. Coaches’ emotional intelligence and reactive behaviors in soccer matches: mediating effects of coach efficacy beliefs. Front Psychol2019; 10: 1629.
17.
JowettS. Interdependence analysis and the 3+1Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. In: JowettSLavalleeD (eds) Social psychology in sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.15–27.
18.
FouldsSHoffmannSHinckK, et al.The coach–athlete relationship in strength and conditioning: high performance athletes’ perceptions. Sports2019; 7: 244.
19.
DavisLJowettSSörmanD. The importance of positive relationships for coaches’ effectiveness and well-being. Int Sport Coach J2022; 10: 254–265.
20.
PensgaardARobertsG. Elite athletes’ experiences of the motivational climate: the coach matters. Scand J Med Sci Sports2002; 12: 54–59.
21.
LafrenièreMJowettSVallerandR, et al.Passion in sport: on the quality of the coach–athlete relationship. J Sport Exerc Psychol2008; 30: 541–560.
22.
CollinsDCruickshankAJordetG. Routledge handbook of elite sport performance. London: Routledge, 2019.
23.
GucciardiDGordonSDimmockJ, et al.Understanding the coach’s role in the development of mental toughness: perspectives of elite Australian football coaches. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 1483–1495.
24.
JowettS. The coach-athlete relationship within a cross-boundary team of experts: a conceptual analysis. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2024: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2024.2416968.
25.
CoussensAHStoneMJDonachieTC. Coach-athlete relationships, self-confidence, and psychological wellbeing: the role of perceived and received coach support. Eur J Sport Sci2025; 25: e12226.
26.
PoucherZATamminenKACaronJG, et al.Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: a focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2019; 13: 163–186.
27.
PapathomasA. Narrative inquiry: from cardinal to marginal and back? In: SmithBSparkesAC (eds) Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. London: Routledge, 2016, pp.37–48.
28.
MoserAKorstjensI. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract2018; 24: 9–18.
29.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res2016; 26: 1753–1760.
30.
Castillo-MontoyaM. Preparing for interview research: the interview protocol refinement framework. Qual Rep2016; 21: 811–831.
31.
KallioHPietiläAJohnsonM, et al.Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs2016; 72: 2954–2961.
32.
DiCicco-BloomBCrabtreeBF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ2006; 40: 314–321.
33.
PotracPJonesRLNelsonL. Interpretivism. In: Research methods in sports coaching. London: Routledge, 2014, pp.31–41.
34.
CôtéJSalmelaJRussellS. The knowledge of high-performance gymnastic coaches: competition and training considerations. Sport Psychol1995; 9: 76–95.
35.
SmithBSparkesAC. Analyzing talk in qualitative inquiry: exploring possibilities, problems, and tensions. Quest2005; 57: 213–242.
36.
BooroffMNelsonLPotracP. A coach’s political use of video-based feedback: a case study in elite-level academy soccer. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 116–124.
37.
BraunVClarkeV. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2019; 11: 589–597.
38.
BraunVClarkeV. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage, 2021.
39.
KigerMEVarpioL. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach2020; 42: 846–854.
40.
BraunVClarkeV. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. Int J Transgend Health2023; 24: 1–6.
41.
SmithBMcGannonKR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2018; 11: 101–121.
42.
TracySJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq2010; 16: 837–851.
43.
DevlinESkeaDAlderDB, et al.‘Mundane, repetitive, and forgettable’: a qualitative investigation of elite Gaelic football players’ perceptions of half-time team talks. Int J Sports Sci Coach2025; 21: 295–306.
44.
CreswellJW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. London: Sage, 2013.
45.
FinlayL. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual Res2002; 2: 209–230.
46.
CavallerioFWadeyRWagstaffCR. Member reflections with elite coaches and gymnasts: looking back to look forward. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2020; 12: 48–62.
47.
JamieKRathboneAP. Using theory and reflexivity to preserve methodological rigour of data collection in qualitative research. Res Methods Med Health Sci2022; 3: 11–21.
48.
CushionC. Coach behaviour. In: LyleJCushionC (eds) Sports coaching: professionalisation and practice. London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2010, pp.43–61.
49.
JowettSNtoumanisN. The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation. Scand J Med Sci Sports2004; 14: 245–257.
50.
BloomGStevensDWickwireT. Expert coaches’ perceptions of team building. J Appl Sport Psychol2003; 15: 129–143.
51.
BennieAO’ConnorD. Coach-athlete relationships: a qualitative study of professional sport teams in Australia. Int J Sport Health Sci2012; 10: 58–64.
52.
LefebvreJEvansMTurnnidgeJ, et al.Describing and classifying coach development programmes: a synthesis of empirical research and applied practice. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016; 11: 887–899.
53.
NelsonLCushionCPotracP. Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2013; 18: 204–218.
54.
López de SubijanaCMartinLRamosJ, et al.How coach leadership is related to the coach-athlete relationship in elite sport. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16: 1239–1246.
55.
McShanKMooreE. Systematic review of the coach–athlete relationship from the coaches’ perspective. Kinesiol Rev2023; 12: 158–173.
56.
NashCSprouleJ. Career development of expert coaches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; 4: 121–138.
57.
KjærJ. The professionalization of sports coaching: a case study of a graduate soccer coaching education program. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ2019; 24: 50–52.
58.
JowettSShanmugamV. Relational coaching in sport: its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness. In: SchinkeRMcGannonKSmithB (eds) Routledge international handbook of sport psychology. London: Routledge, 2016, pp.471–484.
59.
TshubeTHanrahanS. Southern African Olympian perspectives of the coach-athlete relationship. Int J Sport Psychol2018; 49: 224–239.
60.
ContreiraANascimento JuniorJCaruzzoN, et al.Basic psychological needs and sports satisfaction among Brazilian athletes and coaches: the mediating role of the dyadic relationship. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2543.
61.
JowettSNtoumanisN. The Greek coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (Gr CART-Q): scale construction and validation. Int J Sport Psychol2003; 34: 101–124.
62.
RhindDJowettS. Initial evidence for the criterion-related and structural validity of the long versions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire. Eur J Sport Sci2010; 10: 359–370.
63.
WhiteRBennieA. Resilience in youth sport: a qualitative investigation of gymnastics coach and athlete perceptions. Int J Sports Sci Coach2015; 10: 379–393.
64.
HarristCWittP. Seeing the court: a qualitative inquiry into youth basketball as a positive developmental context. J Sport Behav2012; 35: 125–153.
65.
LorimerRJowettS. Empathic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. J Appl Sport Psychol2009; 21: 201–212.
66.
SmithMArthurCHardyJ, et al.Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: the mediating role of intrateam communication. Psychol Sport Exerc2013; 14: 249–257.
67.
JowettSNezlekJ. Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. J Soc Pers Relat2011; 29: 287–301.
68.
KjærJBjärsholmDFahlströmP, et al.Breaking through? Exploring care in the early life of elite Swedish athletes. Sports Coach Rev2023; 12: 68–86.
69.
FrøyenAPensgaardAGustafssonH. “You can be my coach, but I am the one in charge”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the importance of the coach-athlete relationship in Norwegian super-elite athletes. Int J Appl Sports Sci2020; 32: 49–68.
70.
DeutschM. Cooperation and competition. In: DeutschMColemanPMarcusE (eds) The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2006, pp.23–42.
71.
FryMMooreE. Motivation in sport: theory and application. In: AnshelMPetrieTSteinfeldtJ (eds) APA Handbook of sport and exercise psychology. Washington (DC: American Psychological Association, 2019, pp.273–299.
72.
AvciKÇepikkurtFKaleE. Examination of the relationship between coach-athlete communication levels and perceived motivational climate for volleyball players. Univ J Educ Res2018; 6: 346–353.
73.
SalcinovicBDrewMDijkstraP, et al.Factors influencing team performance: what can support teams in high-performance sport learn from other industries? A systematic scoping review. Sports Med Open2022; 8: 1–18.
74.
RiceSWaltonCPilkingtonV, et al.Psychological safety in elite sport settings: a psychometric study of the Sport Psychological Safety Inventory. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2022; 8: e001251.
75.
JowettSDo Nascimento-JúniorJZhaoC, et al.Creating the conditions for psychological safety and its impact on quality coach-athlete relationships. Psychol Sport Exerc2023; 65: 102363.
76.
WachsmuthSJowettSHarwoodC. Managing conflict in coach-athlete relationships. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol2018; 7: 371.
77.
McCarthyE. The role of the coach-athlete relationship in world class coaching success. J Swim Res2021; 28: 22–31.
78.
YangSXJowettS. Conceptual and measurement issues of the complementarity dimension of the coach–athlete relationship across cultures. Psychol Sport Exerc2013; 14: 830–841.
79.
RhindDJowettS. Development of the coach-athlete relationship maintenance questionnaire (CARM-Q). Int J Sports Sci Coach2012; 7: 121–137.
80.
WachsmuthSJowettSHarwoodC. On understanding the nature of interpersonal conflict between coaches and athletes. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 1955–1962.
81.
PurdyLJonesRCassidyT. Negotiation and capital: athletes’ use of power in an elite men’s rowing program. Sport Educ Soc2009; 14: 321–338.
