Although coach–athlete relationships (CAR) have been widely studied, less is known about how perceived coach behavior (PCB) operates through group-based identity processes and how individual emotion regulation and developmental factors shape this mechanism. Drawing on Social Identity Theory and Emotion Regulation Theory, this study examined a dual-moderated mediation model in which team identification (TI) mediates the association between PCB and CAR, with emotional intelligence (EI) and age defining key boundary conditions.
Methods
A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among 581 athletes from provincial-level competitive sports teams in China.
Results
Positive coaching behaviors strengthened CAR indirectly by enhancing athletes’ team identification, whereas autocratic behavior undermined this relationship by weakening TI. Moreover, EI moderated the TI–CAR pathway, such that TI was a stronger predictor of CAR among athletes with lower EI. This moderating effect was further conditioned by age, remaining significant among younger athletes but diminishing and becoming non-significant among older athletes.
Conclusion
These findings advance research on coach–athlete relationships by integrating group-based identity processes with individual emotion regulation and developmental perspectives. From a practical perspective, the results suggest that fostering team identity may be particularly effective for younger or lower-EI athletes, whereas more individualized leadership and communication strategies may be more appropriate for older or emotionally intelligent athletes.
DavisLJowettSSörmanD, et al.The role of quality relationships and communication strategies for the fulfilment of secure and insecure athletes’ basic psychological needs. J Sports Sci2022; 40: 2424–2436.
2.
López de SubijanaCMartinLJRamosJ, et al.How coach leadership is related to the coach-athlete relationship in elite sport. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16: 1239–1246.
3.
CarsonFBlakeyMFouldsSJ, et al.Behaviors and actions of the strength and conditioning coach in fostering a positive coach-athlete relationship. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: 3256–3263.
4.
KimS-KChoiH. Effects of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ aggressive behavior and athlete burnout: verification of the mediating effects of coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy. Front Psychol2024; 15: 1388185.
5.
ZhangRRhimY-T. The effect of coach–athlete relationships on motor behaviour in college athletes—mediating effects of psychological needs. Behav Sci2023; 14: 579.
6.
WuAMSLaiMHCChanIT, et al.Coaching behaviors, satisfaction of needs, and intrinsic motivation among Chinese university athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol2014; 26: 334–348.
7.
JowettSPoczwardowskiA. Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In: Jowett S and Lavallee D (eds) Social psychology in sport. 1th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2020, pp.15–28.
8.
González-GarcíaHMartinentGNicolasM. Relationships between perceived coach leadership and athletes’ affective states experienced during competition. J Sports Sci2021; 39: 568–575.
9.
AshforthBEMaelF. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manage Rev1989; 14: 20.
10.
De BackerMBoenFCeuxT, et al.Do perceived justice and need support of the coach predict team identification and cohesion? Testing their relative importance among top volleyball and handball players in Belgium and Norway. Psychol Sport Exerc2011; 12: 192–201.
11.
De BackerMVan PuyenbroeckSFransenK, et al.Does fair coach behavior predict the quality of athlete leadership among Belgian volleyball and basketball players: the vital role of team identification and task cohesion. Front Psychol2022; 12: 645764.
12.
MillerAJSlaterMJTurnerMJ. Coach identity leadership behaviours are positively associated with athlete resource appraisals: the mediating roles of relational and group identification. Psychol Sport Exerc2020; 51: 101755.
13.
AiLWangY. Proactive personality and coach-athlete relationship: the mediation of self-determined motivation. Chin J Clin Psychol2017; 25: 1119–1123.
14.
AşçiFHKelecekSAltintaşA. The role of personality characteristics of athletes in coach–athlete relationships. Percept Mot Skills2015; 121: 399–411.
15.
MayerJDSaloveyPCarusoDR. Emotional intelligence: new ability or eclectic traits?Am Psychol2008; 63: 503–517.
16.
GrossJJJohnOP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol2003; 85: 348–362.
17.
CeceVGuillet-DescasENicolasM, et al.Emotional intelligence training program for adolescents involved in intensive training centers. J Appl Sport Psychol2023; 35: 1026–1049.
18.
DavisLJowettS. Coach–athlete attachment and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: implications for athlete’s well-being. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1–11.
19.
TriguerosRAguilar-ParraJMÁlvarezJF, et al.Emotion, psychological well-being and their influence on resilience. A study with semi-professional athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health1980; 16: 4192.
20.
DworakowskiOHuberZMMeierT, et al.Emotion regulation across the lifespan: age differences in intrapersonal and interpersonal strategies for the adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic in four countries. Aging Ment Health2022; 26: 2048–2053.
TamminenKAGaudreauPMcEwenCE, et al.Interpersonal emotion regulation among adolescent athletes: a Bayesian multilevel model predicting sport enjoyment and commitment. J Sport Exerc Psychol2016; 38: 541–555.
23.
CeceVGuillet-DescasENicaiseV, et al.Longitudinal trajectories of emotions among young athletes involving in intense training centres: do emotional intelligence and emotional regulation matter?Psychol Sport Exerc2019; 43: 128–136.
24.
MaHWangE. The mediation of cohesion between Coaches’ leadership behavior, athlete’s role involvement and satisfaction. China Sport Sci2006; 26: 64–69.
25.
ChelladuraiPSalehSD. Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: development of a leadership scale. J Sport Psychol1980; 2: 34–45.
26.
JowettSNtoumanisN. The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation. J Exp Psychol Appl2004; 21: 89–100.
27.
MaelFAshforthBE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav1992; 13: 103–123.
28.
XuanL. Project team diversity, psychological empowerment and team identification: A correlational study. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang: Zhejiang University, 2007.
29.
WongC-SLawKS. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude. J Exp Psychol Appl2002; 14: 89–100.
30.
ZhouHLongL. Statistical remedies for common method biases. Adv Psychol Sci2004; 12: 942–950.
31.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford, 2013, p.233.
32.
TajfelHTurnerJC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Jost JT and Sidanius J (eds) Political psychology. 1th ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2024, pp.276–293.
33.
CampoMLouvetBHarabiS. Dimensions of social identification with the team as predictors of the coach-created training climate in rugby: a group-actor partner interdependence modelling perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc2022; 59: 102104.
34.
FransenKHaslamSASteffensNK, et al.Believing in “us”: exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity. J Exp Psychol Appl2015; 21: 89–100.
35.
ButaliaRBoenFHaslamSA, et al.Is identity leadership provided by coaches and athlete leaders associated with performance? A cross-cultural study in football teams. Appl Psychol2025; 74: e12585.
36.
NguyenNNNhamPTTakahashiY. The joint effect of value diversity and emotional intelligence on team creativity: evidence from Vietnam. Int J Emerg Mark2024; 20: 3782–3797.
37.
JowettSDo Nascimento-JúniorJRAZhaoC, et al.Creating the conditions for psychological safety and its impact on quality coach-athlete relationships. Psychol Sport Exerc2023; 65: 102363.
38.
JuravichMBabiakK. Examining positive affect and job performance in sport organizations: a conceptual model using an emotional intelligence Lens. J Appl Sport Psychol2015; 27: 477–491.
39.
BarlowABanksAP. Using emotional intelligence in coaching high-performance athletes: a randomised controlled trial. Coach Int J Theory Res Pract2014; 7: 132–139.
40.
DeciELRyanRM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq2000; 11: 227–268.
