Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of different tactical setups in small-sided games on perceptual and locomotor demands, and to evaluate the impact of session timing (beginning vs. end) on variability within and between conditions. Twenty young soccer players participated in 3 small-sided games with 6 conditions: free roles (SSGFREE), positional tactical roles (SSGPOS), and restricted areas (SSGRA), applied at the beginning and end of the session. Perceptual and locomotor responses were measured. All games were played in a 30 × 50 m area, and locomotor data were collected using GPS devices. SSGFREE resulted in lower RPE than positional formats, with higher RPE at the session's end in SSGPOS and SSGRA (p < 0.05). Players in SSGFREE covered more TD than in positional setups, and SSGPOS showed greater TD than SSGRA at the beginning (p < 0.05). VHSD was higher in SSGPOS, particularly at the session's end (p < 0.05). Higher TD, ACC, and VHSD were observed at the beginning of the session across all formats, with greater variability between sets (p < 0.05). Coaches should schedule free-play tasks early to reduce perceived effort and tactical drills later to increase intensity, fatigue, and variability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
