Enhancing athletes’ sport engagement is critically important, as it plays a central role in their development and performance. Drawing on the Person-Environment Fit theory, this study investigates how athlete-coach fit affects sport engagement among elite athletes, with athlete satisfaction serving as a mediating mechanism. To investigate this relationship, 180 elite athletes (female, 74; 41%) registered with the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee were recruited. Data were analyzed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro Model 4 in SPSS 25.0. Results showed that athlete-coach fit positively predicted both athlete satisfaction and sport engagement, and that athlete satisfaction, in turn, predicted sport engagement. Moreover, athlete satisfaction significantly mediated the relationship between athlete-coach fit and sport engagement. These findings highlight the critical role of athlete-coach fit in fostering athlete satisfaction and enhancing sport engagement. They provide actionable insights for coaches and sport organizations on how to strengthen compatibility, support athlete well-being, and sustain long-term participation in sport.
EricssonKAKrampeRTTesch-RömerC. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev1993; 100: 63.
2.
MalinaRM. Early sport specialization: roots, effectiveness, risks. Curr Sports Med Rep2010; 9: 364–371.
3.
BakerJ. Early specialization in youth sport: a requirement for adult expertise?High Abil Stud2003; 14: 85–94.
4.
VavassoriRMorenoMPUreña EspaA. The perception of volleyball student-athletes: evaluation of well-being, sport workload, Players’ response, and academic demands. Healthcare2023; 11: 1538.
5.
NiY-LHsuS-CKuoC-C, et al.High income but high stress: cross over effects of work and family role conflict in professional athletes and their partners. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2022; 20: 677–697.
6.
JiYMcLeodCMChunY. Sport-Life imbalance and athlete burnout: The moderating role of perceived athlete-team fit. Int J Sports Sci Coach2025. 17479541251390843. doi:10.1177/17479541251390843.
7.
McLoughlinEFletcherDSlavichGM, et al.Cumulative lifetime stress exposure, depression, anxiety, and well-being in elite athletes: a mixed-method study. Psychol Sport Exerc2021; 52: 101823.
8.
LongakitJToring-AqueLAqueFJr, et al.The role of coach-athlete relationship on motivation and sports engagement. Phys Educ Students2024; 28: 268–278.
9.
GuillénFMartínez-AlvaradoJR. The sport engagement scale: an adaptation of the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) for the sports environment. Univ Psychol2014; 13: 15–24.
10.
de VriesJDScharpYSBakkerAB. Playful sport design and sport engagement: A diary study among amateur athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc2025; 102953.
11.
HodgeKLonsdaleCJacksonSA. Athlete engagement in elite sport: an exploratory investigation of antecedents and consequences. Sport Psychol2009; 23: 186–202.
12.
Kristof-BrownAGuayRP. Person–environment fit. In: ZedeckS (ed) APA Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 3. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011, pp.3–50.
13.
KimJGatlingA. Impact of employees’ job, organizational and technology fit on engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. J Hosp Tour Technol2019; 10: 323–338.
14.
ZengLSongS. Employee engagement mediates person-environment fit and new employees’ innovative behavior: a multidimensional perspective. PLoS One2025; 20: e0326161.
15.
PengJ-CLeeY-LTsengM-M. Person–organization fit and turnover intention: exploring the mediating effect of work engagement and the moderating effect of demand–ability fit. J Nurs Res2014; 22: 1–11.
16.
CurranTHillAPHallHK, et al.Relationships between the coach-created motivational climate and athlete engagement in youth sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol2015; 37: 193–198.
17.
LeeSKwonSJangD, et al.The effect of coach–athlete fit on the coach–athlete relationship in team sport: role of trust in coach. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 986–993.
18.
BeattieMATurnerBA. The impact of athlete-coach fit on the athletic satisfaction of NCAA division II college athletes. J Study Sports Athl Educ2025; 19: 40–56.
19.
VellaSOadesLCroweT. The role of the coach in facilitating positive youth development: moving from theory to practice. J Appl Sport Psychol2011; 23: 33–48.
20.
Van VianenAEShenCTChuangA. Person–organization and person–supervisor fits: employee commitments in a Chinese context. J Organ Behav2011; 32: 906–926.
21.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In: JohnOPRobinsRWPervinLA (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2008, pp.654–678.
22.
FawverBCowanRDeCoutoB, et al.Psychological characteristics, sport engagement, and performance in alpine skiers. Psychol Sport Exerc2020; 47: 101616.
23.
JowettGEHillAPHallHK, et al.Perfectionism, burnout and engagement in youth sport: the mediating role of basic psychological needs. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 24: 18–26.
GilovichTKeltnerDNisbettR. Social Psychology. New York: W. W. Northon & Company. Inc, 2006, (pp. 25-26).
26.
DawisRVLofquistLH. A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
27.
O'ReillyCAIIIChatmanJCaldwellDF. People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad Manage J1991; 34: 487–516.
28.
DawisRV. Person-environment-correspondence theory. Career Choice Dev2002; 4: 427–464.
29.
BaikSParkH. A meta-analytic study on the relationships of person-supervisor fit with job attitudes and behaviors. Korean J Ind Organ Psychol2020; 33: 233–265.
30.
ChelladuraiP. Leadership in sports. In: TenenbaumGEklundRC (eds) Handbook of sport psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, pp.111–135.
31.
HornTS. Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In: HornTS (ed.) Advances in sport psychology. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
32.
WangY. How person-supervisor fit influence the work engagement of new hires?J Innov Soc Sci Res2021; 2591: 6890.
33.
EdmondsonA. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q1999; 44: 350–383.
34.
CableDMDeRueDS. The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J Appl Psychol2002; 87: 75.
35.
IngramJR. Supervisor-officer fit and role ambiguity: re-assessing the nature of the sergeant-officer attitudinal relationship. Policing2013; 36: 375–398.
36.
GraenGBUhl-BienM. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q1995; 6: 219–247.
37.
Kristof-BrownALZimmermanRDJohnsonEC. Consequences OF INDIVIDUALS’FIT at work: a meta-analysis OF person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Pers Psychol2005; 58: 281–342.
38.
ZhengFJinX. The effect of person-job and person-supervisor fit on job satisfaction. Opción2018: 882–900.
39.
JuezanIJIOsornoRIM. Athletic mental energy and sports engagement as mediated by student-athlete satisfaction. Eur J Phys Educ Sport Sci2024; 11. doi:10.46827/ejpe.v11i2.5412
40.
ChelladuraiPRiemerHA. A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. J Sport Manag1997; 11: 133–159.
41.
DeciELRyanRM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne2008; 49: 182–185.
42.
Van den BroeckAVansteenkisteMDe WitteH, et al.Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work Stress2008; 22: 277–294.
43.
CurranTStandageM. Psychological needs and the quality of student engagement in physical education: teachers as key facilitators. J Teach Phys Educ2017; 36: 262–276.
44.
WangNZhuJDormannC, et al.The daily motivators: positive work events, psychological needs satisfaction, and work engagement. Appl Psychol2020; 69: 508–537.
45.
ContreiraARNascimento JuniorJCaruzzoNM, et al.Basic psychological needs and sports satisfaction among Brazilian athletes and coaches: the mediating role of the dyadic relationship. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2543.
46.
JinHKimSLoveA, et al.Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. Front Psychol2022; 13: 1012953.
47.
ChangWHChangJ-HChenLH. Mindfulness enhances change in athletes’ well-being: the mediating role of basic psychological needs fulfillment. Mindfulness (N Y)2018; 9: 815–823.
48.
FaulFErdfelderEBuchnerA, et al.Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods2009; 41: 1149–1160.
49.
AndersonJCGerbingDW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull1988; 103: 11.
50.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res1981; 18: 39–50.
51.
NunnallyJC. An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook. 1978:97–146.
52.
LawlerECammannCNadlerD, et al.Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire (MOAQ) [database record]. APA PsycTests; 1975.
53.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABSalanovaM. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas2006; 66: 701–716.
54.
KlineP. A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2015.
55.
GregurasGJDiefendorffJM. Different fits satisfy different needs: linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. J Appl Psychol2009; 94: 65.
56.
SchaufeliWBBakkerAB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav2004; 25: 293–315.
57.
GuoJieM. The role of athletic psychology, athlete engagement in athletic performance and athletes sports success in China: does coaching behavior moderates?Rev Psicol Deporte2021; 30: 191–204.
58.
CableDMJudgeTA. Interviewers’ perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions. J Appl Psychol1997; 82: 46.
59.
Kristof-BrownAL. Perceived applicant fit: distinguishing between recruiters' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Pers Psychol2000; 53: 643–671.
60.
RauvolaRSRudolphCWEbbertLK, et al.Person–environment fit and work satisfaction: exploring the conditional effects of age. Work Aging Retire2020; 6: 101–117.
61.
YuXYangYHeB. The effect of athletes’ training satisfaction on competitive state anxiety—a chain-mediated effect based on psychological resilience and coping strategies. Front Psychol2024; 15: 1409757.
62.
JiahaoLJingL. Examining the link between coach-athlete relationship and athlete burnout among college soccer players: the mediating role of training satisfaction. Front Psychol2024; 15: 1409609.
63.
BoštjančičEPetrovčičA. Exploring the relationship between job satisfaction, work engagement and career satisfaction: the study from public university. Hum Syst Manag2019; 38: 411–422.
64.
De SimoneSPlantaACicottoG. The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses’ turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Appl Nurs Res2018; 39: 130–140.
65.
FourakiVStavrouNAApostolidisN, et al.Coach and athlete leadership behaviors: examining their role in athlete’s satisfaction. J Phys Educ Sport2020; 20: 3212–3220.
66.
KimH-DCruzAB. The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: a meta-analytic approach. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016; 11: 900–909.
67.
KeunsuHJaehyunH. Examining the relationship among organizational justice, athlete satisfaction, team commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in college athletes. J Sport Appl Sci2024; 8: 1–10.
68.
KimSOhTLoveA, et al.Impact of met-expectation of athletic justice on athletic satisfaction and organizational commitment via leader–member exchange among elite Saudi Arabian athletes. Behav Sci2023; 13: 36.
69.
Scotto di LuzioSMartinentGGuillet-DescasE, et al.Exploring the role of sport sense of community in perceived athlete burnout, sport motivation, and engagement. J Appl Sport Psychol2020; 32: 513–528.
70.
MorrisRTodDEubankM. From youth team to first team: an investigation into the transition experiences of young professional athletes in soccer. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2017; 15: 523–539.
71.
CôtéJBrunerMWEricksonK, et al.Athlete development and coaching. In: LyleJCushionC (eds) Sport coaching: professionalization and practice. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2010, pp.63–83.
72.
GilbertWade. Coaching better every season : a year-round system for athlete development and program success. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2016.
73.
ZakiyM. Linking person supervisor fit with employee performance and work engagement: the mediating role of LMX. Sage Open2024; 14: 21582440241271183.
74.
Na-NanKPhanniphongKJaturatN, et al.The influence of person-organization fit on employee engagement: psychological contract as a mediating effect in Thailand's logistics industry. Acta Psychol2025; 254: 104756.
75.
GregurasGJDiefendorffJMCarpenterJ, et al.Person-environment fit and self-determination theory. Oxford Handbook Work Engage, Motiva, Self-Determin Theory2014: 143–161.
76.
YooJ. Perceived autonomy support and behavioral engagement in physical education: a conditional process model of positive emotion and autonomous motivation. Percept Mot Skills2015; 120: 731–746.
77.
RhindDJJowettSYangS. A comparison of athletes’ perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship in team and individual sports. J Sport Behav2012; 35: 433.
