Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Can horizontal jump performance using minimal individual differences be used to regulate training load in young soccer players? A randomized controlled trial
This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of training load regulation based on horizontal jump (HJ) performance using minimal individual differences (MID) with a pre-planned neuromuscular training control on physical fitness in young soccer players. Nineteen Brazilian youth players were allocated into a regulated group (RG) and a control group (CG). After a familiarization period, HJ reliability was assessed to determine each player's MID, which was then used to guide the RG's training adjustments over six weeks, while the CG followed a traditional training plan. Performance tests included countermovement jump (CMJ), HJ, sprinting (10–30 m), and maximal running speed in the 30–15 Intermittent Fitness Test (V-IFT), assessed at baseline (T0), mid- (T1), and post-intervention (T2). Internal load was monitored using session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), acute-sRPE, monotony-sRPE, and strain-sRPE. At baseline, performance levels were similar between groups. The RG showed a significant improvement in HJ at T2 (T2 > T0; p = 0.042, ES = moderate), while both groups improved in V-IFT at T1 (p < 0.001, ES = moderate-large) and T2 (p < 0.001, ES = moderate). The RG presented more total jumps during training than the CG (p = 0.007, ES = large). In conclusion, regulating training load based on HJ performance and MID approach led to better improvements in HJ distance for the RG compared to traditional training. The findings suggest that coaches and researchers could consider HJ performance-based regulation to adapt and individualize neuromuscular training loads.
PassfieldLMuriasJMSacchettiM, et al.Validity of the training-load concept. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2022; 17: 507–514.
2.
JeffriesACMarcoraSMCouttsAJ, et al.Development of a revised conceptual framework of physical training for use in research and practice. Sports Med2022; 52: 709–724.
3.
ImpellizzeriFMJeffriesACWeismanA, et al.The ‘training load’ construct: why it is appropriate and scientific. J Sci Med Sport2022; 25: 445–448.
4.
ImpellizzeriFMMarcoraSMCouttsAJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2019; 14: 270–273.
5.
WestSWClubbJTorres-RondaL, et al.More than a metric: how training load is used in elite sport for athlete management. Int J Sports Med2021; 42: 300–306.
6.
AfonsoJRochaTNikolaidisPT, et al.A systematic review of meta-analyses comparing periodized and non-periodized exercise programs: why we should go back to original research. Front Physiol2019; 10: 1023.
7.
SuchomelTJNimphiusSBellonCR, et al.The importance of muscular strength: training considerations. Sports Med2018; 48: 765–785.
8.
SiffMC. Supertraining. Denver, CO: Supertraining Institute, 2000.
9.
GreigLStephens HemingwayBHAspeRR, et al.Autoregulation in resistance training: addressing the inconsistencies. Sports Med2020; 50: 1873–1887.
10.
MannJBThyfaultJPIveyPA, et al.The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. Linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 1718–1723.
11.
ClaudinoJGCroninJBMezêncioB, et al.Autoregulating jump performance to induce functional overreaching. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 2242–2249.
12.
ClaudinoJGCroninJBAmadioAC, et al.How can the training load be adjusted individually in athletes with an applied statistical approach?J Athl Enhancement2016; 5: 4.
13.
ClaudinoJGMezêncioBSoncinR, et al.Pre vertical jump performance to regulate the training volume. Int J Sports Med2011; 33: 101–107.
14.
LoturcoIPereiraLAKobalR, et al.Transference effect of vertical and horizontal plyometrics on sprint performance of high-level U-20 soccer players. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 2182–2191.
15.
MaulderPCroninJ. Horizontal and vertical jump assessment: reliability, symmetry, discriminative and predictive ability. Phys Ther Sport2005; 6: 74–82.
16.
MoranJRamirez-CampilloRLiewB, et al.Effects of vertically and horizontally orientated plyometric training on physical performance: a meta-analytical comparison. Sports Med2021; 51: 65–79.
17.
ClaudinoJGCardoso FilhoCABoullosaD, et al.The role of veracity on the load monitoring of professional soccer players: a systematic review in the face of the big data era. Appl Sci (Basel)2021; 11: 6479.
18.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother2010; 63: 100–107.
19.
ClaudinoJGMezêncioBSoncinR, et al.Development of an individualized familiarization method for vertical jumps. Rev Bras Med Esporte2013; 19: 359–362.
20.
Ramirez-CampilloRMoranJOliverJL, et al.Programming plyometric-jump training in soccer: a review. Sports2022; 10: 94.
21.
BarnettAGVan Der PolsJCDobsonAJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol2005; 34: 215–220.
22.
YudkinPLStrattonIM. How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studies. Lancet1996; 347: 241–244.
23.
BorgGA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc1982; 14: 377–381.
24.
FosterCFlorhaugJAFranklinJ, et al.A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res2001; 15: 109–115.
25.
ChamariKHachanaYAhmedYB, et al.Field and laboratory testing in young elite soccer players. Br J Sports Med2004; 38: 191–196.
26.
BoscoCBelliAAstruaM, et al.A dynamometer for evaluation of dynamic muscle work. Eur J Appl Physiol1995; 70: 379–386.
27.
ClaudinoJGCroninJMezêncioB, et al.The countermovement jump to monitor neuromuscular status: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport2017; 20: 397–402.
28.
BuchheitM. The 30-15 intermittent fitness test: accuracy for individualizing interval training of young intermittent sport players. J Strength Cond Res2008; 22: 365–374.
29.
HopkinsWGMarshallSWBatterhamAM, et al.Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41: 3–12.
30.
de LaceyJBrughelliMMcGuiganM, et al.The effects of tapering on power-force-velocity profiling and jump performance in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res2014; 28: 3567–3570.
31.
BosquetLMontpetitJArvisaisD, et al.Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc2007; 39: 1358–1365.
32.
Ramírez-CampilloRMeylanCMPÁlvarez-LepínC, et al.The effects of interday rest on adaptation to 6 weeks of plyometric training in young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res2015; 29: 972–979.
33.
Ramirez-CampilloRAlvarezCGentilP, et al.Sequencing effects of plyometric training applied before or after regular soccer training on measures of physical fitness in young players. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 1959–1966.
34.
FyfeJJBishopDJSteptoNK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med2014; 44: 743–762.
35.
MujikaIHalsonSBurkeLM, et al.An integrated, multifactorial approach to periodization for optimal performance in individual and team sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2018; 13: 538–561.
36.
NakamuraFYPereiraLARabeloFN, et al.Faster futsal players perceive higher training loads and present greater decreases in sprinting speed during the preseason. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 1553–1562.
37.
BuchheitM. The 30-15 intermittent fitness test: 10 year review. Myorobie J2010; 1: 1–24.
38.
MeckelYDoronOEliakimE, et al.Seasonal variations in physical fitness and performance indices of elite soccer players. Sports2018; 6: 14.
39.
LoturcoIPereiraLAKobalR, et al.Half-squat or jump squat training under optimum power load conditions to counteract power and speed decrements in Brazilian elite soccer players during the preseason. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 1283–1292.
40.
Ramírez-CampilloRVergara-PedrerosMHenríquez-OlguínC, et al.Effects of plyometric training on maximal-intensity exercise and endurance in male and female soccer players. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 687–693.
41.
WrigleyRDrustBStrattonG, et al.Quantification of the typical weekly in-season training load in elite junior soccer players. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1573–1580.
42.
RabeloFNPasquarelliBNGonçalvesB, et al.Monitoring the intended and perceived training load of a professional futsal team over 45 weeks: a case study. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 134–140.
