This study examines whether the pressure perceived by coaches in their clubs as well as their burnout experiences are antecedents of the perceived motivational climate (empowering and disempowering) that they create in their teams. The participants of this study were 124 grassroots soccer coaches who completed the questionnaires tapping the variables of interest. Path analysis showed that perceived pressure within the club positively predicted the coaches’ burnout experiences, which in turn positively predicted their perception of creating disempowering climate and negatively predicted their perceived creation of empowering climate. Burnout mediated the relationship between the perceived club pressure and their perceived creation of empowering and disempowering climate. Minimizing the pressure exerted by the clubs, and the burnout experienced by the coaches may lead the coaches to create empowering climates in their teams.
HarwoodCGThrowerSN. Motivational climate in youth sport groups. In: BrunerMWEysMAMartinLJ (eds) The power of groups in youth sport. San Diego: Academic Press, 2020, pp.145–163.
2.
NichollsJG. The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
3.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications, 2017.
4.
DudaJLBalaguerI. The coach-created motivational climate. In: LavalleeDJowettS (eds) Social psychology of sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.117–130.
5.
NtoumanisN. A self-determination theory perspective on motivation in sport and physical education: Current trends and possible future research directions. In: RobertsGCTreasureDC (eds) Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012, pp.91–128.
6.
DeCharmsR. Personal causation. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull1995; 117: 497–529.
9.
DudaJL. Goal perspectives research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstanding. In: RobertsGC (ed.) Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2001, pp.129–182.
10.
NewtonMDudaJLYinZ. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 in a sample of female athletes. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 275–290.
11.
DudaJL. The conceptual and empirical foundations of Empowering CoachingTM: Setting the stage for the PAPA project. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 11: 311–318.
12.
MossmanLHSlempGRLewisKJ, et al.Autonomy support in sport and exercise settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2022.2031252.
13.
MageauGAVallerandRJ. The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. J Sports Sci2003; 21: 883–904.
14.
ReinbothMDudaJLNtoumanisN. Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motiv Emot2004; 28: 297–313.
15.
Diloy-PeñaSSevil-SerranoJAbósÁ, et al.Differences between the technical-traditional model and the teaching games for understanding model on motivation and commitment of young athletes: A cross-sectional study. Retos2022; 44: 421–432.
16.
PulidoJJSánchez-OlivaDLeoFM, et al.Development and validation of Coaches’ Interpersonal Style Questionnaire. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci2018; 22: 25–37.
17.
DudaJLAppletonPEmpowering and disempowering coaching behaviors: Conceptualization, measurement considerations, and intervention implications. In: RaabMWyllemanPSeilerR (eds) Sport and exercise psychology research: From theory to practice. London: Elsevier, 2016, pp.374–390.
18.
DudaJLAppletonPRStebbingsJ, et al.Towards more empowering and less disempowering environments in youth sport. In: KnightCJHarwoodCGGouldD (eds) Sport psychology for young athletes. New York: Routledge, 2018, pp.81–93.
19.
BalaguerICastilloIDudaJL. Creación de climas de empoderamiento [Creation of empowering climates]. In: García-CalvoTLeoFMCervellóEM (eds) Dirección de grupos deportivos [Management of sports teams]. Valencia: Editorial Tirant lo Blanch, 2021, pp.447–469.
20.
BalaguerIGonzálezLFabraP, et al.Coaches’ interpersonal style, basic psychological needs and the well- and ill-being of young soccer players: A longitudinal analysis. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1619–1629.
21.
Castillo-JiménezNLópez-WalleJMTomásI, et al.Empowering and disempowering motivational climates, mediating psychological processes, and future intentions of sport participation. Int J Environ Res Public Heal2022; 19: 896.
22.
GonzálezLCastilloIGarcía-MeritaM, et al.Autonomy support, psychological needs satisfaction and well-being: Invariance of a structural model in soccer players and dancers. Rev Psicol del Deport.2015; 24: 121–129.
23.
GonzálezLGarcía-MeritaMCastilloI, et al.Young athletes’ perceptions of coach behaviors and their implications on their well-and ill-being over time. J Strength Cond Res30. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001170.
24.
QuestedEDudaJL. Antecedents of burnout among elite dancers: A longitudinal test of basic needs theory. Psychol Sport Exerc2011; 12: 159–167.
25.
ReinbothMDudaJL. Motivational climate, perceived ability, and athletes’ psychological and physical well-being. Sport Psychol2004; 18: 237–251.
26.
ReinbothMDudaJL. Perceived motivational climate, need satisfaction and indices of well-being in team sports: A longitudinal perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc2006; 7: 269–286.
27.
StebbingsJTaylorIMSprayCM, et al.Antecedents of perceived coach interpersonal behaviors: The coaching environment and coach psychological well- and ill-being. J Sport Exerc Psychol2012; 34: 481–502.
28.
RocchiMPelletierLG. The antecedents of coaches’ interpersonal behaviors: The role of the coaching context, coaches’ psychological needs, and coaches’ motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol2017; 39: 366–378.
29.
AlcarazSTorregrossaMViladrichC, et al.From AGT to SDT, from athletes to coaches: Refocusing the study of sport motivation. Eur J Hum Mov2014; 32: 125–144.
30.
MatosicDNtoumanisNQuestedE. Antecedents of need supportive and controlling interpersonal styles from a self-determination theory perspective: A review and implications for sport psychology research. In: RaabMWyllemanPSeilerR, et al. (eds) New perspectives on sport and exercise psychology. London: Elsevier, 2016, pp.145–180.
31.
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNCuevasR, et al.Job pressure and ill-health in physical education teachers: The mediating role of psychological need thwarting. Teach Teach Educ2014; 37: 101–107.
32.
CarrollMAllenJ. Zooming in’ on the antecedents of youth sport coaches’ autonomy-supportive and controlling interpersonal behaviours: A multimethod study. Int J Sport Sci Coach2021; 16: 236–248.
33.
RocchiMAPelletierLGCoutureAL. Determinants of coach motivation and autonomy supportive coaching behaviours. Psychol Sport Exerc2013; 14: 852–859.
34.
TaylorIMNtoumanisNStandageM. A self-determination theory approach to understanding the antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. J Sport Exerc Psychol2008; 30: 75–94.
35.
StebbingsJTaylorIMSprayCM. Antecedents of perceived coach autonomy supportive and controlling behaviors: Coach psychological need satisfaction and well-being. J Sport Exerc Psychol2011; 33: 255–272.
36.
BentzenMKenttäGRichterA, et al.Impact of job insecurity on psychological well and ill-being among high performance coaches. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 1–15.
37.
MaslachCSchaufeliWBLeiterMP. Job burnout. Annu Rev 2Psychology2001; 53: 397–422.
38.
Gil-MontePR. El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout). Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar [Burnout syndrome. A work-related illness in the welfare society]. Madrid: Pirámide, 2005.
39.
FaulFErdfelderEBuchnerA, et al.Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods2009; 41: 1149–1160.
40.
PelletierLGSéguin-LévesqueCLegaultL. Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. J Educ Psychol2002; 94: 186–196.
41.
Gil-MontePRUndaSSandovalJI. Validez factorial del ‘“Cuestionario para la Evaluación del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo”’ (CESQT) en una muestra de maestros mexicanos [Factorial validity of the ‘Burnout Syndrome Evaluation Questionnaire’ (CESQT) in a sample of Mexican teachers]. Salud Ment2009; 32: 205–214.
42.
Soto-RubioAGiménez-EspertMDCPrado-GascóV. Effect of emotional intelligence and psychosocial risks on burnout, job satisfaction, and nurses’ health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 1–14.
43.
SolstadBEStenlingAOmmundsenY, et al.Initial psychometric testing of the coach-adapted version of the Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire: A Bayesian approach. J Sports Sci2020; 38: 626–643.
44.
Gutiérrez GarcíaPCastillo JiménezNBalaguerI, et al.Validación del Cuestionario de Climas Motivacionales Empowering y Disempowering en jóvenes deportistas mexicanos [Validation of the Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in young Mexican athletes. Rev Latinoam Psicol2022; 54: 120–129.
45.
MuthénLKMuthénBO. Mplus version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén, 2012.
46.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 3rd ed.New York: Guilford Press, 2022.
47.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods2008; 6: 53–60.
48.
HuLTBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J1999; 6: 1–55.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson, 2013.
51.
ForeroCGMaydeu-OlivaresAGallardo-PujolD. Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Struct Equ Model2009; 16: 625–641.
52.
FrostJWaltonCCPurcellR, et al.The mental health of elite-level coaches: A systematic scoping review. Sport Med – Open10. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-023-00655-8.
