Girls are integral members of the sporting community; however, their sports participation and development continue to be shaped by gender, age, and cultural factors. In Israel, the socio-cultural context presents unique challenges and experiences for young female athletes. However, little is known about their preferences regarding coaching behaviors and leadership styles. Given the central role of coaches in fostering girls’ persistence in sports, this study examined the leadership style preferences of Israeli girls engaged in organized sports, with particular focus on democratic and autocratic coaching styles. Findings indicated that while some girls expressed a clear preference for a democratic leadership style, many showed flexibility and acceptance toward behaviors typically associated with autocratic leadership. Notably, participants emphasized the importance of situational leadership, suggesting that effective coaching requires adaptability to athletes’ needs and context. These findings highlight the value of adopting a cultural lens when examining athletes’ preferences. Additionally, the findings underscore the need for coach education programs to develop culturally responsive leadership practices that support girls’ sustained engagement in sports.
EimeRHarveyJCharityM, et al.Longitudinal trends in sport participation and retention of women and girls. Front Sports Act Living2020 Apr 16; 2: 39.
7.
SchinkeRJPapaioannouAGSchackT. Sport psychology in emerging countries: an introduction. Int J Sport Exer Psychol2016 Apr 2; 14: 103–109.
8.
Developing Physically Active Girls. An Evidence-based Multidisciplinary Approach. Report for the Tucker Center Research; 2018. Available from: z.umn.edu/tcrr-r3.
9.
WhiteheadSBiddleS. Adolescent girls’ perceptions of physical activity: a focus group study. Eur Phys Educ Rev2008 June; 14: 243–262.
10.
WilliamsNWhippPRJacksonB, et al.Relatedness support and the retention of young female golfers. J Appl Sport Psychol2013 Oct; 25: 412–430.
11.
CraikeMJSymonsCZimmermannJAM. Why do young women drop out of sport and physical activity? A social ecological approach. Ann Leis Res2009 Jan; 12: 148–172.
12.
KeathleyKHimeleinMJSrigleyG. Youth Soccer Participation and Withdrawal: Gender Similarities and Differences. J Sport Behav2013; 36: 171–188.
Katriel. Communication modes, Israeli-Jewish. In: KimYY (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
ZaidmanN. Cultural codes and languages strategies in business communication: interactions between Israeli and Indian businesspeople. Report, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Management Communication Quarterly2001 Feb; 14: 408–441.
19.
GalilyYKaufmanHTamirI. She got game?! Women, sport and society from an Israeli perspective. Israel Affairs2015 Oct 2; 21: 559–584.
20.
Harel-ShalevAHussEDaphna-TekoahS, et al.Drawing (on) women’s military experiences and narratives – Israeli women soldiers’ challenges in the military environment. Gender, Place & Culture2017 Apr 3; 24: 499–514.
21.
ArarKHRigbiA. ‘To participate or not to participate?’—status and perception of physical education among Muslim Arab-Israeli secondary school pupils. Sport Educ Soc2009 May; 14: 183–202.
22.
ArarK. Arab high school pupils’ attitudes towards physical education: gender perspectives. Mov J Phys Educ Sport Sci2009; 9: 127–153.
23.
GindiSAvivAHisherikM. Her karate point of view: body image among adolescent female karate athletes. Mov J Phys Educ Sport Sci2019; 2: 207–238.
24.
AbadiEGillDL. The role of socializing agents on dropout and continuing participation of adolescent girls in masculine-typed sports. Int J Kines High Edu2020 July 2; 4: 77–90.
25.
ZarretNVelizP. Coaching through a Gender Lens: Maximizing Girls’ Play and Potential A Women’s Sports Foundation Research Report. 2019.
LeeSKDworkinJ. Multiple channels of communication: association between emerging Adults’ communication patterns, well-being, and parenting. Emerging Adulthood2023 Feb; 11: 48–57.
28.
Sevil-SerranoJAbósÁDiloy-PeñaS, et al.The influence of the coach’s autonomy support and controlling behaviours on motivation and sport commitment of youth soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021 Aug 17; 18: 8699.
29.
KippLEWeissMR. Social influences, psychological need satisfaction, and well-being among female adolescent gymnasts. Sport Exer Perform Psychol2013 Feb; 2: 62–75.
30.
WhiteheadAUmehKWalshB, et al.Back to netball: motivations for participation in a female-focused netball sport program. Women Sport Phys Act J2019 Apr; 27: 21–29.
31.
McGeeVDeFreeseJD. The coach-athlete relationship and athlete psychological outcomes. J Clin Sport Psychol2019 Mar; 13: 152–174.
32.
ChoiHJeongYKimSK. The relationship between coaching behavior and athlete burnout: mediating effects of communication and the coach–athlete relationship. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020 Nov 20; 17: 8618.
33.
ChelladuraiPSalehSD. Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: development of a leadership scale. J Sport Psychol1980; 2: 34–45.
34.
ChelladuraiP. Leadership in sports: a review. Int J Sport Psychol1990; 21: 328–354.
ArthurCABastardozN. Leadership in sportHandbook of sport psychology. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020[cited 2025 Oct 5].344–371. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119568124.ch16.
37.
CruzABKimHD. Leadership preferences of adolescent players in sport: influence of coach gender. J Sport Sci Med2017; 16: 172–179.
38.
KimSParkSLoveA, et al.Coaching style, sport enjoyment, and intent to continue participation among artistic swimmers. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021 June; 16: 477–489.
39.
HqigaardRCuyperBDFransenK, et al.Perceived coach behavior in training and competition predicts collective efficacy in female elite handball players. Report, University of Minnesota Libraries. 2015.
40.
HartotoSRidwanMAndrijantoD, et al.The coach leadership style: how it impacts on the sports commitment and playing skills of student tennis athletes?Phys Edu Theory Method2023 Aug 30; 23: 543–551.
41.
JinHKimSLoveA, et al.Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. Front Psychol2022 Dec 12; 13: 1012953.
42.
Wałach-BiśtaZM. What do we want and what do we get from the coach? Preferred and perceived leadership in male and female team sports. Hum Mov2019 June 10; 20: 38–47.
43.
BorghiGBorgesPMenezes MenegassiV, et al.Relationship between preferred leadership style and motivation in young soccer regional players title. J Phys Educ Sport2017; 17: 2599–2603.
44.
CostaJPáduaMMoreiraAC. Leadership styles and innovation management: what is the role of human capital?Admin Sci2023 Feb 7; 13: 47.
45.
CarrollMAllenJ. ‘Zooming in’ on the antecedents of youth sport coaches’ autonomy-supportive and controlling interpersonal behaviours: a multimethod study. Int J Sport Sci Coac2021 Apr; 16: 236–248.
46.
LiSLiJ. Fostering trust: authoritarian, benevolent, and moral paternalistic leadership styles and the coach–athlete relationship. Soc Behav Pers2021 Dec 1; 49: 1–11.
47.
ČapricIStankovicMDordevicD, et al.The impact of basketball coach’s leadership style on perfectionism of basketball players. J Phys Educ Sport2023; 23: 1332–1339.
48.
BabbittDG. Influences of Eastern and Western Cultures in Sport Coaching Leadership Styles: A Review of the Literature. Int J Coach Sci2019; 13: 18–35.
49.
The International Council for Coaching Excellence. International Sport Coaching Framework (ISCF) and European Sport coaching Framework (ESCF). https://icce.ws/project/iscf-and-escf/. 2012. (June 2021).
50.
MerriamSBTisdellEJ.Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
51.
FreemanT. Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Advan Nurs2006 Dec; 56: 491–497.
CohenMillerADurraniNKataevaZ, et al.Conducting focus groups in multicultural educational contexts: lessons learned and methodological insights. Int J Qual Method2022 Apr; 21: 1–10.
56.
BarlowMWatsonBJonesE, et al.The influence of professional identity on how the receiver receives and responds to a speaking up message: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs2023 Jan 30; 22: 26.
57.
YounasAFàbreguesSDuranteA, et al.Providing English and native language quotes in qualitative research: a call to action. Nurs Open2022 Jan; 9: 168–174.
OmliJWiese-BjornstalDM. Kids speak: preferred parental behavior at youth sport events. Res Q Exerc Sport2011 Dec; 82: 702–711.
60.
KorstjensIMoserA. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Euro J Gen Pract2018 Jan 1; 24: 120–124.
61.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006 Jan; 3: 77–101.
62.
ClarkeVBraunV. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol2017 May 4; 12: 297–298.
63.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al.Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Method2017 Dec 1; 16: 1609406917733847.
64.
MorseJM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res2015 Sept; 25: 1212–1222.
65.
AmoroseAJAnderson-ButcherD. Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: a test of self-determination theory. Psychol Sport Exer2007 Sept; 8: 654–670.
66.
DudaJL. The conceptual and empirical foundations of empowering coaching™: setting the stage for the PAPA project. Int J Sport Exer Psychol2013 Oct 18; 11: 311–318.
67.
MageauGAVallerandRJ. The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model. J Sports Sci2003 Nov; 21: 883–904.
68.
GustafssonHSagarSSStenlingA. Fear of failure, psychological stress, and burnout among adolescent athletes competing in high level sport. Scandinavian Med Sci Sports2017 Dec; 27: 2091–2102.
69.
KristiansenERobertsGC. Young elite athletes and social support: coping with competitive and organizational stress in “Olympic” competition. Scandinavian Med Sci Sports2010 Aug; 20: 686–695.
70.
CôtéJGilbertW. An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009 Sept; 4: 307–323.
71.
CranmerGA. Athletic coaching: a communication perspective. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Peter Lang, 2019.
72.
WitteKS. Coaching leadership preferences: insight from the national collegiate athletic association division III athlete. J Coach Edu2011 Aug; 4: 73–87.
73.
Bokhorst-HengWMarshallKK. Informing research (practices) through pedagogical theory: focus groups with adolescents. Int J Res Method Educ2019 Mar 15; 42: 148–162.
74.
GoldnerB-D. Adolescents’ true-self behavior and adjustment: the role of family security and satisfaction of basic psychological needs. Merrill Palmer Q2016; 62: 48.
75.
ThomaesSSedikidesCVan Den BosN, et al.Happy to be “me?” authenticity, psychological need satisfaction, and subjective well-being in adolescence. Child Dev2017 July; 88: 1045–1056.
76.
MarsollierÉHauwDVon RotenFC. Acceptable or not: an in-depth analysis of adolescent competitive Athletes’ perceptions on abusive coaching behaviors. J Interpers Violence2024 Dec; 30: 1–23.
77.
MalloyDCKellRKellnR. The spirit of sport, morality, and hypoxic tents: logic and authenticity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2007 Apr; 32: 289–296.
78.
KimSHongSMagnusenMJ, et al.Hard knock coaching: a cross-cultural study of the effects of abusive leader behaviors on athlete satisfaction and commitment through interactional justice. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020 Dec; 15: 597–609.
79.
ZachSGuySBen-yeheskelR, et al.Clear yet Crossed: Athletes’ Retrospective Reports of Coach Violence. Soc Sci2024; 14: 486.
80.
CollinsLCollinsD. Managing the cognitive loads associated with judgment and decision-making in a group of adventure sports coaches: a mixed-method investigation. J Adv Edu Outdoor Learn2021 Jan 2; 21: 1–16.
81.
KolfschotenGFrenchSBrazierF. A discussion of the cognitive load in collaborative problem-solving: the decision-making phase. Eur J Decis Process2014 Dec; 2: 257–280.
82.
NixdorfIFrankRBeckmannJ. Comparison of Athletes’ Proneness to Depressive Symptoms in Individual and Team Sports: Research on Psychological Mediators in Junior Elite Athletes. Front Psychol2016 June 17; 7: 893.
83.
PluharEMcCrackenCGriffithKL, et al.Team sport athletes may be less likely to suffer anxiety or depression than individual sport athletes. J Sport Sci Med2019; 18: 490–496.
84.
HornTSBloomPBerglundKM, et al.Relationship between collegiate Athletes’ psychological characteristics and their preferences for different types of coaching behavior. Sport Psychol2011 June; 25: 190–211.
