The originality of study ascertained coaches’ engagement and integration of Performance Analysis (PA) practice across the Foundation (FP), Youth Development (YDP), and Professional Development (PDP) phases within elite academy youth football. Sixty-five (65) coaches (experience 5.5 ± 4.0) completed an online survey focusing upon their utilisation and access to analysis tools, recollection and reflective practice, communication and professional relationship, suggested improvements and current value of PA services. Likert scales (Always, Usually, Sometimes, Rarely, No Access) were used to facilitate comparison. Analysis was undertaken using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests to identify differences in response provision between academy phases. The engagement and integration of PA practices varied significantly across phases due to time, resources, and buy-in. PA usage progressed from FP to PDP, with greater integration and more sophisticated tools becoming prevalent towards the latter stages of a player's academy journey. Overall satisfaction with PA services was high, but clear improvement areas were highlighted, particularly around Independent Learning Plans (ILP) and the presence of analysts during training sessions across all phases. Despite the introduction of the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP), the study's significance highlights insufficient guidance on how PA should be distributed across phases. This has led to a disproportion of PA across phases with the potential benefits for the FP and YDP being under realised.
O’DonoghuePG. An Introduction to Performance Analysis of Sport. London: Routledge, 2015.
5.
ButterworthAWoodwardJ. Performance analysis in the coaching process. In: ButterworthA (ed.) Professional practice in sport performance analysis. New York: Routledge, 2023, pp.1–18.
6.
CarlingC. Performance analysis: working in football. In: Routledge handbook of elite sport performance. London: Routledge, 2019, pp.99–113.
7.
MulvennaCBloyceDTwistC,et al.I code as much as I can because you never know what they might ask for’. The role of the coach in performance analysis: the view of the analyst. Int J Sports Sci Coach2024 Dec; 19: 2345–2355.
8.
DavidsonT-K, et al.Professional soccer practitioners’ perceptions of using performance analysis technology to monitor technical and tactical player characteristics within an academy environment: a category 1 club case study.Plos one2024; 19: e0298346.
9.
BennettKJVaeyensRFransenJ. Creating a framework for talent identification and development in emerging football nations. Sci Med Footb2019; 3: 36–42.
10.
MacNamaraACollinsD. Profiling, exploiting, and countering psychological characteristics in talent identification and development. Sport Psychol2015; 29: 73–81.
11.
LarkinPReevesMJ. Junior-elite football: time to re-position talent identification?Soccer Soc2018; 19: 1183–1192.
12.
UnnithanVWhiteJGeorgiouA, et al.Talent identification in youth soccer. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1719–1726.
WrightCCarlingCLawlorC, et al.Elite football player engagement with performance analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport2016; 16: 1007–1032.
15.
FranksIMMillerG. Eyewitness testimony in sport. J Sport Behav1986; 9: 38–45.
16.
LairdPWatersL. Eyewitness recollection of sport coaches. Int J Perform Anal Sport2008; 8: 76–84.
17.
NichollsSBWorsfoldPR. The observational analysis of elite coaches within youth soccer: the importance of performance analysis. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016; 11: 825–831.
18.
ReillyTBangsboJFranksA. Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 669–683.
19.
StolenTChamariKCastagnaC, et al.Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med2005; 35: 501–536.
20.
PazoCLSáenz-LópezPFraduaL. Influence of the sporting context in the formation of the soccer players of the Spanish soccer team. Rev Psicol Deporte2012; 21: 291–299.
21.
LiebermannDGKatzLHughesMD, et al.Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 755–769.
22.
CarlingCWilliamsMAReillyT. Handbook of soccer match analysis: a systematic approach to improving performance. London: Routledge, 2005.
23.
FrancisJJonesG. Elite rugby union players perceptions of performance analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport2014; 14: 188–207.
24.
LooJKFrancisJWBatemanM. Athletes’ and Coaches’ perspectives of performance analysis in women’s sports in Singapore. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 20: 960–981.
25.
PabloECastellanoRReevesJM, et al.An exploratory investigation of junior-elite football coaches’ behaviours during video-based feedback sessions. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 2: 729–746.
26.
CastellanoREUriondoL. A review of the multidisciplinary approach to develop elite players at professional football academies: applying science to a professional context. Int J Perform Anal Sport2015; 15: 1–19.
27.
FranksIMGoodmanDMillerG. Human factors in sports systems: an empirical investigation of events in team games. In: Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting. Los Angeles: CA: SAGE Publications, 1983, pp.383–386.
28.
LyleJ. The coaching process: an overview. In: CrossNLyleJ (eds) The coaching process: principles and practice for sports. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinman, 1999, pp.25–46.
29.
GroomRCushionCNelsonL. The delivery of video-based performance analysis by England youth soccer coaches: towards a grounded theory. J Appl Sport Psychol2011; 23: 16–32.
30.
MackenzieRCushionC. Performance analysis in football: a critical review and implications for future research. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 639–676.
31.
ButterworthAWoodwardJ. Performance analysis as coach development tool. In: ButterworthA (ed.) Professional practice in sport performance analysis. New York: Routledge, 2023, pp.89–105.
32.
BudrionisABellikaJGAugestadKM, et al.An evaluation framework for defining the contributions of telestration in surgical telementoring. J Med Internet Res2013; 2: e2611.
33.
MartinDO’ DonoghuePGBradleyJ, et al.Developing a framework for professional practice in applied performance analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 21: 845–888.
34.
WrightCAtkinsSJonesB. An analysis of elite coaches’ engagement with performance analysis services (match, notational analysis and technique analysis). Int J Perform Anal Sport2012; 12: 436–451.
35.
WrightCAtkinsSJonesB, et al.The role of performance analysts within the coaching process: performance analysts survey ‘the role of performance analysts in elite football club settings’. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 240–261.
36.
BatemanMJonesG. Strategies for maintaining the coach-analyst relationship within professional football utilizing the COMPASS model: the performance analyst's perspective. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2064.
37.
CallinanMJConnorJDSinclairWH, et al.Exploring rugby coaches perception and implementation of performance analytics. Plos one2023; 18: e0280799.
38.
JowettSCarpenterP. The concept of rules in the coach-athlete relationship. Sports Coach Rev2015; 4: 1–23.
39.
MartinDSwantonABradleyJ, et al.The use, integration and perceived value of performance analysis to professional and amateur Irish coaches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2018; 13: 520–532.
40.
Gomez-RuanoMAIbáñezSJLeichtAS. Performance analysis in sport. Front Psychol2020; 11: 611634.
41.
AndersenLWFrancisJWBatemanM. Danish association football coaches’ perception of performance analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 22: 149–173.
42.
CushionCJGriffithsMArmourK. Professional coach educators in-situ: a social analysis of practice. Sport Educ Soc2019; 24: 533–546.
43.
GarnerPRobertsWMBakerC, et al.Characteristics of a person-centred coaching approach. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 722–733.
44.
RomarJESarénJHastieP. Athlete-Centred coaching using the sport education model in youth soccer. J Phys Educ Sport2016; 16: 380–391.
45.
CushionCJJonesRL. Power, discourse, and symbolic violence in professional youth soccer: the case of albion football club. Sociol Sport J2006; 23: 142–161.
KojmanYBeechingKGomezMA, et al.The role of debriefing in enhancing learning and development in professional boxing. Int J Perform Anal Sport2022; 22: 250–260.
48.
NichollsSBJamesNBryantE, et al.Elite coaches’ use and engagement with performance analysis within Olympic and Paralympic sport. Int J Perform Anal Sport2018; 18: 764–779.
49.
NichollsSBJamesNBryantE, et al.The implementation of performance analysis and feedback within Olympic sport: the performance analyst’s perspective. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 63–71.
50.
NichollsSBJamesNWellsJ, et al.Performance analysis practice within Olympic and Paralympic sports: a comparison of coach and analyst experiences. Int J Perform Anal Sport2022; 22: 343–351.
51.
HughesMFranksIM. Notational analysis of sport: systems for better coaching and performance in sport. London: Psychology Press, 2004.
52.
CarlingCBloomfieldJNelsenL, et al.The role of motion analysis in elite soccer. Int J Sport Med2008; 38: 839–862.
53.
RelvasHLittlewoodMNestiM, et al.Organizational structures and working practices in elite European professional football clubs: understanding the relationship between youth and professional domains. Eur Sport Manag Q2010; 10: 165–187.
54.
ReevesMJRobertsSJ. Perceptions of performance analysis in elite youth football. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 200–211.
55.
WrightCCarlingCCollinsD. The wider context of performance analysis and it application in the football coaching process. Int J Perform Anal Sport2014; 14: 709–733.
56.
MiddlemasSGHarwoodCG. The role of psychological factors in the delivery of performance analysis–perceptions of youth football coaches and players. Br J Sport Med2015; 49.
57.
DavidsonTKBarrettSTonerJ, et al.Professional soccer practitioners’ perceptions of using performance analysis technology to monitor technical and tactical player characteristics within an academy environment: a category 1 club case study. PloS one2024; 19: e0298346.
58.
SmithJRandsSBatemanM, et al.Assessing the efficacy of video telestration in aiding memory recall among elite professional football players. Sport Innov J2022; 3: 61–81.
59.
JonesDRandsSButterworthAD. The use and perceived value of telestration tools in elite football. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 20: 373–388.
60.
WindtJMacDonaldKTaylorD, et al.To tech or not to tech?” A critical decision-making framework for implementing technology in sport. J Athl Training2020; 55: 902–910.
61.
GroomRCushionC. Using of video based coaching with players: a case study. Int J Perform Anal Sport2005; 5: 40–46.
62.
TremoladaMTavernaLBonichiniS. Which factors influence attentional functions? Attention assessed by KITAP in 105 6-to-10-year-old children. Behav Sci2019; 9: 7.
63.
NelsonLJamesNNichollsS, et al.The importance of appearing trustworthy in the workplace: performance analysts’ perspectives. Sport Educ Soc2023; 30: 1–17.
