Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-12
An integrated perspective of the demand–control and effort–reward imbalance models on burnout among sport coaches: The moderating role of over-commitment and coaching efficacy
The present study aimed to explore the relationship between stress and burnout through an integration of the demand–control (DC) and effort–reward imbalance (ERI) model in the context of sport coaching. This is the first study to integrate these two models to explain burnout experienced by sport coaches, providing a theoretical basis for understanding the development of burnout in this population. A sample of 398 Chinese sport coaches working in the school system participated in the study. Moderated mediation analyses were conducted to test the research model, and results indicated that the data fit the model well and supported all hypotheses. Specifically, the study verified the hypotheses related to the importance of contextual conditions in burnout development (i.e. burnout caused by job stress consistent with ERI) and personal characteristics that regulate these conditions (i.e. over-commitment as the enhancing moderator and coaching efficacy as the buffering moderator consistent with DC). The findings suggest that addressing the social system (i.e. ERI) in which burnout develops and individual responses (i.e. DC) is crucial to prevent burnout among sport coaches.
CôtéJGilbertW. An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; 4: 307–323.
2.
GigesBPetitpasAJVernacchiaRA. Helping coaches meet their own needs: challenges for the sport psychology consultant. Sport Psychol2004; 18: 430–444.
3.
OlusogaPButtJMaynardI, et al. Stress and coping: a study of world class coaches. J Appl Sport Psychol2010; 22: 274–293.
4.
SchaufeliWBSalanovaMGonzález-RomáV, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud2002; 3: 71–92.
CacceseTMMayerbergCK. Gender differences in perceived burnout of college coaches. Sport Exerc Psychol1984; 6: 279–288.
10.
DimitriosBAthanasiosKEleniZ, et al. Job satisfaction and job burnout of coaches–a review of the international literature. Int J Hum Resour Manag Res2013; 3: 27–38.
11.
OlusogaPBentzenMKenttaG. Coach burnout: a scoping review. Int Sport Coach J2019; 6: 42–62.
12.
LundkvistEStenlingAGustafssonH, et al. How to measure coach burnout: an evaluation of three burnout measures. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci2014; 18: 209–226.
13.
LundkvistEGustafssonHDavisPA. What is missing and why it is missing from coach burnout research. In: DavisPA (eds) The psychology of effective coaching and management. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2016, pp. 407–427.
14.
LeeYHChelladuraiP. Emotional intelligence, emotional labor, coach burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in sport leadership. Eur Sport Manag Q2018; 18: 393–412.
15.
McNeillKDurand-BushNLemyrePN. Understanding coach burnout and underlying emotions: a narrative approach. Sports Coach Rev2017; 6: 179–196.
16.
AltfeldSKellmannM. Are German coaches highly exhausted? A study of differences in personal and environmental factors. Int J Sports Sci Coach2015; 10: 637–654.
17.
LundkvistEGustafssonHDavisP,et al.Workaholism, home–work/work–home interference, and exhaustion among sports coaches. J Clin Sport Psychol2016; 10: 222–236.
18.
SchaffranPAltfeldSKellmannM. Burnout in sport coaches: a review of correlates, measurement and intervention. Dtsch Z Sportmed2016; 67: 121–126.
19.
ChroniSDiakakiEPerkosS, et al. What stresses coaches in competition and training? An exploratory inquiry. Int J Coach Sc2013; 7: 25–39.
20.
KnightCJReadeILSelzlerAM, et al. Personal and situational factors influencing coaches’ perceptions of stress. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 1054–1063.
21.
OlusogaPButtJHaysK, et al. Stress in elite sports coaching: identifying stressors. J Appl Sport Psychol2009; 21: 442–459.
22.
ThelwellRCWestonNJGreenleesIA, et al. Stressors in elite sport: a coach perspective. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 905–918.
23.
BentzenMLemyrePNKenttäG. The process of burnout among professional sport coaches through the lens of self-determination theory: a qualitative approach. Sports Coach Rev2014; 3: 101–116.
24.
BentzenMLemyrePNKenttäG. Development of exhaustion for high-performance coaches in association with workload and motivation: a person-centered approach. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 22: 10–19.
25.
OlusogaPKenttäG. Desperate to quit: a narrative analysis of burnout and recovery in high-performance sports coaching. Sport Psychol2017; 31: 237–248.
26.
RaedekeTD. Coach commitment and burnout: a one-year follow-up. J Appl Sport Psychol2004; 16: 333–349.
27.
GolembiewskiRT. The epidemiology of progressive burnout: a primer. J Health Hum Resour Adm1986; 9: 16–37.
28.
LeiterMPMaslachC. The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. J Organ Behav1988; 9: 297–308.
29.
LeeRTAshforthBE. A longitudinal study of burnout among supervisors and managers: comparisons between the Leiter and Maslach (1988) and Golembiewski et al. (1986) models. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process1993; 54: 369–398.
30.
KarasekRA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q1979; 24: 285–308.
31.
SiegristJ. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol1996; 1: 27–41.
32.
OstryASKellySDemersPA, et al. A comparison between the effort-reward imbalance and demand control models. BMC Public Health2003; 3: 1–9.
33.
DraganoNHeYMoebusS, et al. Two models of job stress and depressive symptoms. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2008; 43: 72–78.
34.
AltfeldSSchaffranPKleinertJ, et al. Minimising the risk of coach burnout: from research to practice. Int Sport Coach J2018; 5: 71–78.
35.
BakkerABDemeroutiEEuwemaMC. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J Occup Health Psychol2005; 10: 170–180.
36.
GoodgerKGorelyTLavalleeD, et al. Burnout in sport: a systematic review. Sport Psychol2007; 21: 127–151.
37.
BanduraA. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol1989; 44: 1175–1184.
38.
ShojiKCieslakRSmoktunowiczE, et al. Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. Anxiety Stress Coping2016; 29: 367–386.
39.
FeltzDLChaseMAMoritzSE, et al. A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: preliminary investigation and instrument development. J Educ Psychol1999; 91: 765–776.
40.
Vargas-TonsingTMWarnersAFeltzDL. The predictability of coaching efficacy on team efficacy and player efficacy in volleyball. J Sport Behave2003; 26: 396–407.
41.
MyersNDVargas-TonsingTMFeltzDL. Coaching efficacy in intercollegiate coaches: sources, coaching behavior, and team variables. Psychol Sport Exerc2005; 6: 129–143.
42.
KavussanuMBoardleyIDJutkiewiczN, et al. Coaching efficacy and coaching effectiveness: examining their predictors and comparing coaches’ and athletes’ reports. Sport Psychol2008; 22: 383–404.
43.
Sas-NowosielskiKSzóstakWHermanE. What makes coaches burn out in their job? Prevalence and correlates of coaches’ burnout in Poland. Int J Sports Sci Coach2018; 13: 874–882.
44.
ShortSEShortMWHaugenCR. The relationship between efficacy and burnout in coaches. Int J Coach Sci2015; 9: 37–49.
45.
HoTS. Role stress and job burnout of school coaches: using social support and self-efficacy as moderators. Int J Organ Innov2018; 10: 266–284.
46.
SiegristJLiJ. Associations of extrinsic and intrinsic components of work stress with health: a systematic review of evidence on the effort-reward imbalance model. Int J Environ Health Res2016; 13: 432.
47.
SiegristJ. Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. In: PerrewePLGansterDC (eds) Historical and current perspectives on stress and health. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2002, pp. 261–291.
48.
RaedekeTDGranzykTLWarrenA. Why coaches experience burnout: a commitment perspective. J Sport Exerc Psychol2000; 22: 85–105.
49.
RaedekeTDWarrenAHGranzykTL. Coaching commitment and turnover: a comparison of current and former coaches. Res Q Exerc Sport2002; 73: 73–86.
50.
Van VegchelNDe JongeJBosmaH, et al. Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med2005; 60: 1117–1131.
51.
LoerbroksAMengHChenML, et al. Primary school teachers in China: associations of organizational justice and effort–reward imbalance with burnout and intentions to leave the profession in a cross-sectional sample. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2014; 87: 695–703.
52.
WangZXieZDaiJ, et al. Physician burnout and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai. J Occup Health2014; 56: 73–83.
53.
ViolantiJMMnatsakanovaAAndrewME, et al. Effort–reward imbalance and overcommitment at work: associations with police burnout. Police Q2018; 21: 440–460.
54.
FletcherDScottM. Psychological stress in sports coaches: a review of concepts, research, and practice. J Sports sci2010; 28: 127–137.
55.
AltfeldSMallettCJKellmannM. Coaches’ burnout, stress, and recovery over a season: a longitudinal study. Int Sport Coach J2015; 2: 137–151.
56.
ReizerASiegristJ. Effort–reward imbalance and employee performance with the moderating roles of overcommitment and humor. Int J Stress Manag2022; 29: 205–217.
57.
ReillyNP. Exploring a paradox: commitment as a moderator of the stressor-burnout relationship. J Appl Soc Psychol1994; 24: 397–414.
ChenXChenS. Sports coaching development in China: the system, challenges and opportunities. Sports Coach Rev 2022; 11: 276–297.
60.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press.
61.
SimMKimSYSuhY. Sample size requirements for simple and complex mediation models. Educ Psychol Meas2022; 82: 76–106.
62.
MemonMATingHCheahJH, et al. Sample size for survey research: review and recommendations. J Appl Struct Equ Modeling2020; 4: 1–20.
63.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Boston, USA: Cengage, 2018.
64.
HowellDC. Fundamental statistics for the behavioural sciences (5th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Brookes/Cole, 2004.
65.
SiegristJWegeNPühlhoferF, et al. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2009; 82: 1005–1013.
66.
LiJLoerbroksAShangL, et al. Validation of a short measure of effort-reward imbalance in the workplace: evidence from China. J Occup Health2012; 54: 427–433.
67.
LoerbroksADingHHanW, et al. Work stress, family stress and asthma: a cross-sectional study among women in China. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2017; 90: 349–356.
68.
SiegristJStarkeDChandolaT, et al. The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med2004; 58: 1483–1499.
69.
HarrisBS. Coach and athlete burnout: The role of coaches’ decision-making style. Master’s thesis. West Virginia University, USA, 2005.
70.
HarrisBSOstrowAC. Coach and athlete burnout: the role of coaches’ decision-making style. In: HumphreyJH (eds) Sports and athletics developments. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2008, pp. 81–100.
71.
RaedekeTDSmithAL. Development and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. J Sport Exerc Psychol2001; 23: 281–306.
MorashMKwakDHHoffmanV, et al. Stressors, coping resources and strategies, and police stress in South Korea. J Crim Justice2008; 36: 231–239.
74.
HuangYC. The relationships among job satisfaction, professional commitment, organizational alienation, and coaching efficacy of school volleyball coaches in Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, United States Sports Academy, Alabama, 2006.
75.
LeeKSMaleteLFeltzDL. The strength of coaching efficacy between certified and noncertified Singapore coaches. Int J Appl Sports Sci2002; 14: 55–67.
76.
KimHY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod2013; 38: 52–54.
77.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications, 2015.
78.
HuLTBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model1999; 6: 1–55.
79.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2018.
80.
HairJFJrSarstedtMHopkinsL, et al. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev2014; 26: 106–121.
81.
KelleyBCEklundRCRitter-TaylorM. Stress and burnout among collegiate tennis coaches. J Sport Exerc Psychol1999; 21: 113–130.
82.
MalinauskasRMalinauskieneVDumcieneA. Burnout and perceived stress among university coaches in Lithuania. J Occup Health2010; 52: 302–307.
83.
TashmanLSTenenbaumGEklundR. The effect of perceived stress on the relationship between perfectionism and burnout in coaches. Anxiety Stress Coping2010; 23: 195–212.
84.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerF, et al. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol, 2001; 86: 499–512.
85.
DhurupMDubihlelaD. Sport coaching officials and their stressors: work overload, role ambiguity, role conflict and the influence on job satisfaction of sport coaching officials in Gauteng province, South Africa: sport coaching. Afr J Phys Health Educ Recreat Dance2014; 20: 732–744.
86.
CarsonFWalshJMainLC, et al. High performance coaches’ mental health and wellbeing: applying the areas of work life model. Int Sport Coach J2018; 5: 293–300.
87.
EddyPWertheimEHHaleMW, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effort-reward imbalance model of workplace stress and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis measures of stress. Psychosom Med2018; 80: 103–113.
88.
ChiricoF. Job stress models for predicting burnout syndrome: a review. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 2016; 52: 443–456.
89.
CampbellTSullivanP. The effect of a standardized coaching education program on the efficacy of novice coaches. Avante2005; 11: 38–45.
90.
Van den BroeckAVansteenkisteMDe WitteH, et al. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work Stress2008; 22: 277–294.
91.
EricksonKBrunerMWMacDonaldDJ, et al. Gaining insight into actual and preferred sources of coaching knowledge. Int J Sports Sci Coach2008; 3: 527–538.
92.
JonesRLWallaceM. Another bad day at the training ground: coping with ambiguity in the coaching context. Sport Edu Soc2005; 10: 119–134.
93.
SullivanPPaquetteKJHoltNL, et al. The relation of coaching context and coach education to coaching efficacy and perceived leadership behaviors in youth sport. Sport Psycho2012; 26: 122–134.
94.
WheatonBMontazerS. Stressors, stress, and distress. In: ScheidTBrownT (ed.) A handbook for the study of mental health: social contexts, theories, and systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 171–199.
95.
MyersNDParkSEAhnS, et al. Proposed sources of coaching efficacy: a meta-analysis. J Sport and Exerc Psychol2017; 39: 261–276.
96.
GlandorfHLCoffeePMadiganDJ. Team identification and athlete burnout: testing longitudinal serial mediation via perceived support and stress. Psychol Sport Exerc2022; 63: 102292.
