This research investigated the differences in the anthropometric and morphological characteristics of elite male cricket bowlers and batters over time. A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, between September 2021 and October 2022. A literature search was carried out on three main databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost. This was based on keywords and several inclusion and exclusion criteria. A quality assessment was carried out using the evaluation criteria for quantitative investigations focusing on the problem statement, design of methods, participant characteristics, outcome measures, sample size, analytical methodology, estimation of variance, reporting of results, and overall conclusions, to assess manuscript quality. Data were presented as mean ± SD where appropriate. Fifty-two papers matched all criteria and specific data from each was used for the systematic review. The most common measures investigated were stature, mass, and percentage of body fat. Elite bowlers were found to be significantly (p< 0.001; ES = 1.29) heavier (83.54 ± 4.42 kg vs 79.02 ± 4.26 kg) and significantly taller (p< 0.01; ES = 1.03) (185.64 ± 3.48 cm vs 181.23 ± 2.57 cm) than batters. A strong, positive and significant (p< 0.05) correlation (R2 = 0.77) was shown for batters between stature and time (years) (1987: 179.80 cm; 2021: 183.00 cm). Research on the anthropometrical and morphological characteristics comparing elite cricket bowlers and batters over time is limited. Further inquiry is needed to quantify the effect of these different traits on batting and bowling performance. This is important for player selection, talent identification, and program design.
PoteLChristieCJ. Strength and conditioning practices of university and high school level cricket coaches: a South African context. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 3464–3470.
2.
KoleySKumaarBSShadagopanSP. Anthropometric, physical strength, body composition and performance test profiles of inter-district level male cricketers of Punjab, India. Anthropologist2012; 14: 445–451.
3.
BishopCWeldonAHughesJ, et al.Seasonal variation of physical performance and inter-limb asymmetry in professional cricket athletes. J Strength Cond Res2021; 35: 941–948.
4.
JohnstoneJAFordPA. Physiologic profile of professional cricketers. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 2900–2907.
5.
NoakesTDDurandtJJ. Physiological requirements of cricket. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 919–929.
6.
WormgoorSHardenLMckinonW. Anthropometric, biomechanical, and isokinetic strength predictors of ball release speed in high-performance cricket fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 957–965.
7.
PyneDBDuthieGMSaundersPU, et al.Anthropometric and strength correlates of fast bowling speed in junior and senior cricketers. J Strength Cond Res2006; 20: 620–626.
8.
O’ConnorHOldsTMaughanRJ, et al.International Association of Athletics Federations Physique and performance for track and field events. J Sports Sci2007; 25: S49–S60.
9.
BarbieriDZaccaganiLBabicV, et al.Body composition and size in sprint athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2012; 57: 1142–1146.
10.
ClaessensALLefevreJBeunenG, et al.The contribution of anthropometric characteristics to performance scores in elite female gymnasts. J Sports Med Phys Fit1999; 39: 355–360.
11.
GabbetTJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of amateur rugby players. BJSM2000; 34: 303–307.
12.
BourgoisJAlbrechtLClaessensJV, et al.Anthropometric characteristics of elite junior rowers. BJSM2000; 34: 213–216.
13.
AcklandTRLomanTGSundgot-BorgenJ, et al.Current status of body composition assessment in sport. Sports Med2012; 42: 227–249.
14.
PortusMRSinclairPJBurkeST, et al.Cricket fast bowling performance and technique and the influence of selected physical factors during an 8-over spell. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 999–1011.
15.
GlazierPSParadisisGPCooperSM. Anthropometric and kinematic influences on release speed in men’s fast-medium bowling. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 1013–1021.
16.
TaliepMSPrimSKGrayJ. Upper body muscle strength and batting performance in cricket batters. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 3484–3487.
17.
WeldonAClarkeNDPoteL, et al.Physical profiling of international cricket players: an investigation between batters and bowlers. Biol Sport2021; 38: 507–515.
18.
EscamillaRFFleisigGFDeRenneC, et al.A comparison of age level on baseball hitting kinematics. J Appl Biomech2009; 25: 210–218.
19.
StretchRA. Anthropometric profile of first-class cricketers. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat1987; 10: 65–75.
20.
BartlettRM. The science and medicine of cricket: an overview and update. J Sports Sci2003; 21: 733–752.
21.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
22.
PaezA. Grey literature: an important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med2017; 10: 233–240.
23.
KmetLMLeeRCCookLS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers. Alberta Heritage Found Med Res2004; 13: 1–22.
24.
StretchRA. Anthropometric profile and body composition changes in first-class cricketers. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat1991; 14: 57–64.
25.
StuelckenMPyneDSinclairP. Anthropometric characteristics of elite cricket fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2007; 25: 1587–1597.
26.
HopkinsWG. How to interpret changes in athletic performance tests. Sports Sci2004; 8: 1–7.
27.
PollardR. A difference in heights and weights between right-handed and left-handed bowlers at cricket. Percep Mot Skills1995; 81: 601–602.
28.
RansonCAKerslakeRWBurnettAF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic professional fast bowlers in cricket. J Bone Jt Surg2005; 87-B: 1111–1116.
29.
RansonCABurnettAFKingM. The relationship between bowling action classification and three-dimensional lower trunk motion in fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 267–276.
30.
RansonCKingMBurnettA, et al.The effect of coaching intervention on elite fast bowling technique over a two-year period. Sports Biomech2009; 8: 261–274.
31.
WorthingtonPJKingMRansonCA. Relationship between fast bowling technique and ball release speed in cricket. J Appl Biomech2012; 29: 78–84.
32.
PeploeCKingMHarlandA. The effects of different delivery methods on the movement kinematics of elite cricket batters in repeated front foot drives. Procedia Eng2014; 72: 220–225.
33.
FeltonPJKingMA. The effect of elbow hyperextension on ball speed in cricket fast bowling. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1752–1758.
34.
KingMAWorthingtonPJRansonCA. Does maximising ball speed in cricket fast bowling necessitate higher ground reaction forces?J Sports Sci2016; 34: 707–712.
35.
LeesMJBansilKHindK. Total, regional and unilateral body composition of professional English first-class cricket fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 252–258.
36.
LeesMJBeggsCBBarlowMJ, et al.Bone density and cross-sectional geometry of the proximal femur are bilaterally elevated in elite cricket fast bowlers. J Clin Densitom2017; 21: 399–405.
37.
TallentJHigginsMParkerN, et al.Quantification of bowling workload and changes in the cognitive function in elite fast bowlers in training compared with Twenty20 cricket. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2017; 59: 35–41.
38.
VenessDPattersonSDJeffriesO, et al.The effects of mental fatigue on cricket-relevant performance among elite players. J Sports Sci2017; 35: 2461–2467.
39.
JohnstoneJAHughesGMitchellAC, et al.Accelerometery and heart rate responses of professional fast-medium bowlers in one-day and multi-day cricket. J Sports Sci Med2017; 16: 311–317.
40.
SeningtonBLeeRYWilliamsJM. Are shoulder counter rotation and hip shoulder separation angle representative metrics of three-dimensional spinal kinematics in cricket fast bowling?J Sports Sci2018; 36: 1763–1767.
41.
SandersLFeltonPJKingMA. Kinematic parameters contributing to the production of spin in elite finger spin bowling. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 2787–2793.
42.
SandersLMcCaigSFeltonPJ, et al.Passive range of motion of the hips and shoulders and their relationship with ball spin rate in elite finger spin bowlers. J Sci Med Sport2019; 22: 1146–1150.
43.
AlwaysPPeirceNKingM, et al.Lumbar bone mineral asymmetry in elite cricket fast bowlers. Bone2019; 127: 537–543.
44.
PeploeCMcErlain-NaylorSAHarlandAR, et al.Relationship between technique and bat speed, post-impact ball speed, and carry distance during a range hitting task. Hum Mov Sci2019; 63: 34–44.
45.
FeltonPJListerSLWorthingtonPJ, et al.Comparison of biomechanical characteristics between male and female elite fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 665–670.
46.
FeltonPJYeadonMRKingMA. Optimising the front foot contact phase of the cricket fast bowling action. J Sports Sci2020; 38: 2054–2062.
47.
AlwayPFeltonPBrooke-WavellK, et al.Cricket fast bowling technique and lumber bone stress injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc2021; 53: 581–589.
48.
McErlain-NaylorSAPeploeCGrimleyJ, et al.Comparing power hitting kinematics between skilled male and female cricket batters. J Sports Sci2021; 39: 2393–2400.
49.
SeningtonBLeeRYWilliamsJM. Validity and reliability of innovative field measurements of tibial accelerations and spinal kinematics during cricket fast bowling. Med Biol Eng Comput2021; 59: 1475–1484.
50.
BlissAAhumRJowittH, et al.Variability and physical demands of international seam bowlers in one-day and Twenty20 international matches across five years. J Sci Med Sport2021; 24: 505–510.
51.
BlissAAhumRJowittH, et al.Variability of test match cricket and the effects of match location on physical demands in male seam bowlers. Int J Perform Anal Sport2022; 22: 291–301.
52.
PerrettCBusseyMLambP. External workload intensity in cricket fast bowlers across maximal and sub-maximal intensities: modifying player load and IMU location. J Sports Sci2022; 40: 527–533.
53.
WebsterTMComfortPJonesPA. Relationship between physical fitness and the physical demands of 50-over cricket in fast bowlers. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: e66–e72.
54.
ElliottBCFosterDHGrayS. Biomechanical and physical factors influencing fast bowling. Aus J Sci Med Sport1986; 18: 16–21.
55.
HidesJStantonWFrekeM. MRI Study of the size, symmetry and function of the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with and without lower back pain. Br J Sports Med2007; 42: 809–813.
56.
StuelckenMCGinKASinclairPJ. Musculoskeletal profile of the lumbar spine and hip regions in cricket fast bowlers. Phys Ther Sport2008; 9: 82–88.
57.
HidesJStantonWMcMahonS, et al.Effect of stabilisation training on multifidus muscle cross-sectional area among young elite cricketers with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2008; 38: 101–108.
58.
ChinAElliottBAldersonJ, et al.The off-break and “doosra”: kinematic variations of elite and sub-elite bowlers in creating ball spin in cricket bowling. Sports Biomech2009; 8: 187–198.
59.
DuffieldRCarneyMKarpinnenS. Physiological responses and bowling performance during repeated spells of medium fast bowling. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 27–35.
60.
PhillipsEPortusMDavidsK, et al.Performance accuracy and functional variability in elite and developing fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport2012; 15: 182–188.
61.
KountourisAPortusMCookJ. Cricket fast bowlers without low back pain have large quadratus lumborum asymmetry than injured bowlers. Clin J Sport Med2013; 23: 300–304.
62.
SpratfordWHicksA. Increased delivery stride length places greater loads on the ankle joint in elite male cricket fast bowlers. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1101–1109.
63.
MiddletonKJAldersonJAElliottBC, et al.The influence of elbow joint kinematics on wrist speed in cricket fast bowling. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 1622–1631.
64.
MiddletonKJMillsPMElliottBC. The association between lower liomb biomechanics and ball release speed in cricket fast bowlers: a comparison of high-performance and amateur competitors. Sports Biomech2016; 15: 357–369.
65.
ConnorJDFarrowDRenshawI. Emergence of skilled behaviour in professional, amateur and junior cricket batters during a representative training scenario. Front Psychol2018; 9: 2012.
66.
CallaghanSJLockieRGAndrewsWA, et al.The effect of an eight over cricket bowling spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance within different delivery lengths. Sports2019; 7: 200.
67.
SpratfordWElliottBPortusM, et al.The influence of upper-body mechanics, anthropometry and isokinetic strength on performance in wrist-spin cricket bowling. J Sports Sci2020; 38: 280–287.
68.
LetterRTDwyerDBDrinkwaterEJ, et al.The physical differences between faster and slower elite male and female pace bowlers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2022; 7: 1–7.
69.
LombardWPMuirGAMcKuneAJ. Minimal changes in indirect markers of muscle damage after an acute bout of indoor pre-season fast bowling. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat2012; 34: 105–114.
70.
RajamanthryK. Relationship between upper body strength and maximum hitting distance in cricket batting. Cricket Batting2020; ePub: 1–6.
71.
KrishnaSAAlwarTKSibekoS, et al.Plyometric-based training for isokinetic knee strength and jump performance in cricket fast bowlers. Int J Sports Med2019; 40: 704–710.
72.
GamageJPDe SilvaAPNalliahAK. Effects of dehydration on cricket specific skill performance in hot and humid conditions. Int J Sport Nutr Metab2016; 26: 531–541.
73.
HolwayFESprietLL. Sport-specific nutrition: practical strategies for team sports. J Sports Sci2011; 29: S115–S125.
74.
StronachBCroninJBPortusM. Part 2: mechanical and anthropometric factors of fast bowling for cricket, and implications for strength and conditioning. Strength Cond J2014; 36: 53–60.
75.
BrownTWGoughLAKellyAL. Performance trajectories of bowlers and batters from youth level to senior professional status in cricket. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 22: 1–15.
76.
StretchRBartlettRDavidsK. A review of batting in men’s cricket. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 931–949.
77.
Ul HaqZHabibMNazeerM. Correlation between the anthropometric measures and performance of the cricket pull shot- a case study of the Malaysian national batters. Global Reg Rev2018; 3: 353–361.
78.
NichollsSPoteLThomsonE, et al.The change in test cricket performance following the introduction of T20 cricket. SIJ2023; 4: 1–16.
79.
MooreAJTurnerDJohnstoneAJ. A preliminary analysis of team performance in English first-class twenty-twenty (T20) cricket. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 12: 188–207.
80.
SrivastavaRSharmaAPrasadR. Agility and its impact on performance of cricketers with relation to anthropometry. Int J Phys Educ Sports Sci2017; 2: 8–11.
81.
KasperAMLangan-EvansCHudsonJF. Come back skinfolds, all is forgiven: a narrative review of the efficacy of common body composition methods in applied sports practice. Nutrients2021; 13: 1–19.
82.
NortonKOldsTOliveS, et al.Anthropometry and sports performance, Chapter 11. In: Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. New South Wales: University of New South Wales Press Ltd, 1996, pp.287–352.
83.
KusdinarYAbdullahAGMa’MunA. Revisiting sports talent identification: a meta-analysis. Int J Eng Sci Technol2021; 16: 1258–1272.
