An external focusing strategy was beneficial in experienced children but not in novices: The effect of external focus,internal focus,and holistic attention strategies
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2023
An external focusing strategy was beneficial in experienced children but not in novices: The effect of external focus,internal focus,and holistic attention strategies
External focus (attention directed to an intended effect) has been shown to improve motor performance compared to internal focus (attention directed to body movements). Recently, holistic attention (attention directed to the overall feeling) has been discussed as an effective alternative. We hypothesized that a less specific cue (e.g. holistic attention) may be more effective than an external focus in experienced individuals. Therefore, the present study examined the effect of external focus, internal focus, and holistic attention on 14 experienced children-athletes (Mage, 14.35 ± 1.98 years; Mheight, 171.28 ± 9.53 cm; Mweight, 58.28 ± 10.28 kg) and 14 novice children (Mage, 14.21 ± 1.92 years; Mheight, 170.92 ± 12.40 cm; Mweight, 62.14 ± 15.62 kg). Participants completed a 16-meter front crawl swimming task with assigned instructions for three trials per condition. The results showed main effects of skill level (p < 0.001), condition (p = 0.006), and the skill level/condition interaction (p = 0.003). Post hoc tests revealed that external focus was superior to internal focus (p < 0.001), with no difference between holistic attention and internal focus (p = 0.158) or holistic attention and external focus (p = 0.05) in the experienced athletes, while none of the conditions were different in novices. The benefits of attentional focus may be influenced by the level of experience.
HodgesNJFranksIM. Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 793–811.
2.
OtteFWDavidsKMillarS-K, et al.When and how to provide feedback and instructions to athletes?—how sport psychology and pedagogy insights can improve coaching interventions to enhance self-regulation in training. Front Psychol2020; 11: 1444.
3.
Kam JWY, Dao E, Blinn P, Krigolson OE, Boyd LA, & Handy TC. Mind wandering and motor control: off-task thinking disrupts the online adjustment of behavior. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2012; 6: 329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00329
4.
ConnorCEEgethHEYantisS. Visual attention: bottom-up versus top-down. Curr Biol2004; 14: R850–R852.
5.
WulfG. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 6: 77–104.
6.
ChuaL-KJimenez-DiazJLewthwaiteR, et al.Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychol Bull2021; 147: 618–645.
7.
FreudenheimAMWulfGMadureiraF, et al.An external focus of attention results in greater swimming speed. Int J Sports Sci Coach2010; 5: 533–542.
8.
StoateIWulfG. Does the attentional focus adopted by swimmers affect their performance?Int J Sports Sci Coach2011; 6: 99–108.
9.
MakarukHPorterJMMakarukB. Acute effects of attentional focus on shot put performance in elite athletes. Kinesiology2013; 45(1): 55–62.
10.
BellJJHardyJ. Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. J Appl Sport Psychol2009; 21: 163–177.
11.
HalperinIChapmanDWMartinDT, et al.The effects of attentional focus instructions on punching velocity and impact forces among trained combat athletes. J Sports Sci2017; 35: 500–507.
12.
WulfGSheaCParkJH. Attention and motor performance: preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Res Q Exerc Sport2001; 72: 335–344.
13.
WulfGMcNevinNSheaCH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol A2001; 54: 1143–1154.
14.
McNevinNHSheaCHWulfG. Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychol Res2003; 67: 22–29.
15.
PorterJSimsB. Altering focus of attention influences elite athletes sprinting performance. Int J Coach Sci2013; 7: 41–51.
16.
WulfG. Attentional focus effects in balance acrobats. Res Q Exerc Sport2008; 79: 319–325.
17.
WinkelmanNCClarkKPRyanLJ. Experience level influences the effect of attentional focus on sprint performance. Hum Mov Sci2017; 52: 84–95.
18.
FittsPMPosnerMI. Human performance. Oxford, England: Brooks/Cole, 1967, Human performance.
19.
SchneiderWShiffrinRM. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev1977; 84: 1–66.
20.
PorterJNolanROstrowskiE, et al.Directing attention externally enhances agility performance: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the efficacy of using verbal instructions to focus attention. Front Psychol2010; 1: 216.
21.
BeckerKAGeorgesAFAikenCA. Considering a holistic focus of attention as an alternative to an external focus. J Mot Learn Dev2019; 7: 194–203.
22.
MastersR. Knowledge, knerves and know-how: the role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British J Psychol1992; 83: 343–358.
23.
LamWKMaxwellJPMastersRSW. Probing the allocation of attention in implicit (motor) learning. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 1543–1554.
24.
LiaoCMMastersRS. Analogy learning: a means to implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci2001; 19: 307–319.
25.
MullenRHardyL. State anxiety and motor performance: testing the conscious processing hypothesis. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 785–799.
26.
MullenRFaullAJonesES, et al.Evidence for the effectiveness of holistic process goals for learning and performance under pressure. Psychol Sport Exerc2015; 17: 40–44.
27.
MullenRHardyL. Conscious processing and the process goal paradox. J Sport Exerc Psychol2010; 32: 275–297.
28.
Abedanzadeh R, Becker K, Mousavi SMR. Both a holistic and external focus of attention enhance the learning of a badminton short serve. Psychol Res. 2022; 86(1):141–149.
29.
AbdollahipourRPalomo NietoMPsottaR, et al.External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children. Psychol Sport Exerc2017; 32: 17–24.
30.
AshrafRAghdasiMTSayyahM, et al.The effects of internal and external focus of attention on children`s performance in vertical jump task. Inter J Basic Sci Appl Res 2012; 1(1): 1–5.
31.
PalmerKKMatsuyamaALIrwinJM, et al.The effect of attentional focus cues on object control performance in elementary children. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2017; 22: 580–588.
32.
HadlerRChiviacowskySWulfG, et al.Children's learning of tennis skills is facilitated by external focus instructions. Mot Rev Educ Física2014; 20: 418–422.
33.
FlôresFSMenezesKMKatzerJI. Influências do sexo na atenção e na aprendizagem de habilidades motoras. J Phys Educ2016; 27: e-2706.
34.
BeckerKSmithPJK. Age, task complexity, and sex as potential moderators of attentional focus effects. Percept Mot Skills2013; 117: 130–144.
35.
MarchantDCGriffithsGPartridgeJA, et al.The influence of external focus instruction characteristics on children's motor performance. Res Q Exerc Sport2018; 89: 418–428.
36.
van AbswoudeFNuijenNBvan der KampJ, et al.Individual differences influencing immediate effects of internal and external focus instructions on Children's Motor performance. Res Q Exerc Sport2018; 89: 190–199.
37.
AgarCHumphriesCANaquinM, et al.Does varying attentional focus affect skill acquisition in children? A comparison of internal and external focus instructions and feedback. Phys Educ2016; 73: 639–651.
38.
EmanuelMJarusTBartO. Effect of focus of attention and age on motor acquisition, retention, and transfer: a randomized trial. Phys Ther2008; 88: 251–260.
39.
SingerRN. Preperformance satate, routines, and automaticity: what does it take to realize expertise in self-paced events?J Sport Exerc Psychol2002; 24: 359–375.
40.
HaywoodKGetchellN. Life span motor development. 2020.
41.
NoguchiKGelYRBrunnerE, et al.nparLD: an R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J Stat Softw.2012; 50: 1–23.
42.
QianZJRicciAJ. Effects of cochlear hair cell ablation on spatial learning/memory. Sci Rep2020; 10: 20687.
43.
MairPWilcoxR. Robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behav Res Methods2020; 52: 464–488.
44.
MaurerHMunzertJ. Influence of attentional focus on skilled motor performance: performance decrement under unfamiliar focus conditions. Hum Mov Sci2013; 32: 730–740.
45.
YamadaMHigginsLQRaisbeckL. How external and internal focus are used in the field: a review. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 17(3): 647–654: 17479541211068956.
46.
SchoolerJWSchreiberCA. Experience, meta-consciousness, and the paradox of introspection. J Conscious Studes2004; 11: 17–39.
47.
BlakemoreSJFrithC. Self-awareness and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol2003; 13: 219–224.
48.
BorghiAMBarcaLBinkofskiF, et al.Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci2018; 373: 20170121.
49.
BorghiAMBarcaLBinkofskiF, et al.Words as social tools: language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Phys Life Rev2019; 29: 120–153.
50.
WulfGHößMPrinzW. Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav1998; 30: 169–179.
51.
LohseKRSherwoodDEHealyAF. On the advantage of an external focus of attention: a benefit to learning or performance?Hum Mov Sci2014; 33: 120–134.
52.
ChiviacowskySWulfGWallyR. An external focus of attention enhances balance learning in older adults. Gait Posture2010; 32: 572–575.
