3 × 3 is a variation of classic basketball (BB) that imposes new demands on both athletes and coaches. The objective of this study was to comprehensively describe similarities and differences in load structures between 3 × 3 and BB.
Method
Between January 2020 and July 2021, internal and external load parameters of 90 elite BB and 3 × 3 athletes were monitored during 84 games using a local positioning system (10 Hz) and inertial movement sensors (100 Hz).
Results
Male BB games last about 90 min; female games are shorter (82 min). Game duration in 3 × 3 is about 16 min. Compared with BB, 3 × 3 athletes perform more medium- and high-intensity accelerations and decelerations, explosive efforts, jumps, and changes of direction (CODs) per min. Average heart rates do not differ between the two disciplines, yet 3 × 3 games are rated as more exhausting than BB games. During a 3 × 3 tournament, no decrease in load characteristics is found in the final games. However, ratings of perceived exertion increase consecutively. Average possession duration in 3 × 3 is 5.4 s in which 1.4 passes are played. Most 2-point shots and turnovers occur in the last minutes (11 min – end) of the game.
Conclusion
The findings of this study will help 3 × 3 coaches and athletes to design more effective training programmes and improve athletic performance. They indicate a need to focus on high accelerations, transitions, COD skills, and shooting under pressure in 3 × 3.
BakerRMartin RandinVRigamontiA, et al.Beach volleyball media guide: rio 2016 olympic games / fédération internationale de volleyball. Lausanne: Fédération Internationale de Volleyball, 2016.
2.
ZapardielJCAsín-IzquierdoI. Conditional analysis of elite beach handball according to specific playing position through assessment with GPS. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 20: 118–132.
3.
Musa RMPPAbdul MajeedA, et al.Technical and tactical performance indicators discriminating winning and losing team in elite asian beach soccer tournament. PLOS ONE2019; 14: e0219138.
4.
HerránAUsabiagaOCastanelloJ. Comparación del perfil fisico entre 3 ×3 y 5 ×5 ein balocesto formative/physical profile comparision between 3 ×3 and 5 ×5 basketball training. Rev.int.med.cienc.act.fís.deporte2017; 17: 435–447.
5.
MontgomeryPGMaloneyBD. Three-by-Three basketball: inertial movement and physiological demands during elite games. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2018; 13: 1169–1174.
6.
ConteDStraigisEClementeFM, et al.Performance profile and game-related statistics of FIBA 3 ×3 basketball world cup 2017. Biol Sport2019; 36: 149–154.
7.
McGownRBBallNBLeggJS, et al.The perceptual, heart rate and technical-tactical characteristics of 3 ×3 basketball. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 772–782.
8.
VanrenterghemJNedergaardNJRobinsonMA, et al.Training load monitoring in team sports: a novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Med2017; 47: 2135–2142.
9.
FieldsJBLameiraDMShortJL, et al.Relationship between external load and self-reported wellness measures across a men's Collegiate soccer preseason. J Strength Cond Res2021; 35: 1182–1186.
10.
Reina RománMGarcía-RubioJFeuS, et al.Training and competition load monitoring and analysis of women's Amateur basketball by playing position: approach study. Front Psychol2019; 9: 2689.
11.
BaileyJAGastinPBMackeyL, et al.The player load associated with typical activities in elite netball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: 1218–1223.
12.
BredtSdGChagasMHPeixotoGH, et al.Understanding player load: meanings and limitations. J Hum Kinet2020; 71: 5–9.
13.
DalenTIngebrigtsenJEttemaG, et al.Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 351–359.
14.
BorgEKaijserL. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests. Scand J Med Sci Sports2006; 16: 57–69.
15.
ErčuljFVidicMLeskošekB. Shooting efficiency and structure of shooting in 3×3 basketball compared to 5v5 basketball. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 15: 91.
16.
StojanovićEStojiljkovićNScanlanAT, et al.The activity demands and physiological responses encountered during basketball match-play: a systematic review. Sports Med2018; 48: 111–135.
17.
Vázquez-GuerreroJAyalaFGarciaF, et al.The most demanding scenarios of play in basketball competition from elite under-18 teams. Front Psychol2020; 11: 552.
18.
MontgomeryPGMaloneyBD. 3×3 Basketball: performance characteristics and changes during elite tournament competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2018; 13: 1349–1356.
19.
MontgomeryPGPyneDBHopkinsWG, et al.The effect of recovery strategies on physical performance and cumulative fatigue in competitive basketball. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 1135–1145.
20.
HoppeMWBaumgartCPolglazeT, et al.Validity and reliability of GPS and LPS for measuring distances covered and sprint mechanical properties in team sports. PLoS ONE2018; 13: e0192708.
21.
LinkeDLinkDLamesM. Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions. PLoS ONE2018; 13: e0199519.
22.
Pino-OrtegaJOliva-LozanoJMGantoisP, et al.Comparison of the validity and reliability of local positioning systems against other tracking technologies in team sport: a systematic review. Proc. Inst Mech. Eng2021. doi:10.1177/1754337120988236
23.
AlonsoEMirandaNZhangS, et al.Peak match demands in young basketball players: approach and applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 2256.
24.
WeissKJAllenSVMcGuiganMR, et al.The relationship between training load and injury in men's Professional basketball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: 1238–1242.
25.
PetwayAJFreitasTTCalleja-GonzálezJ, et al.Training load and match-play demands in basketball based on competition level: a systematic review. PLOS ONE2020; 15: e0229212.
26.
AokiMSRondaLTMarcelinoPR, et al.Monitoring training loads in professional basketball players engaged in a periodized training program. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 348–358.
27.
SvilarLJukićI. Load monitoring system in top-level basketball team: relationship between external and internal training load. Kinesiology2018; 50: 25–33.
28.
PuenteCAbián-VicénJArecesF, et al.Physical and physiological demands of experienced male basketball players during a competitive game. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 956–962.
29.
KlusemannMJPyneDBFosterC, et al.Optimising technical skills and physical loading in small-sided basketball games. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1463–1471.
30.
HeishmanADDaubBDMillerRM, et al.Monitoring external training loads and neuromuscular performance for division I basketball players over the preseason. J Sports Sci Med2020; 19: 204–212.
31.
MakivićBNikićMDWillisM. Heart rate variability (HRV) as a tool for diagnostic and monitoring performance in sport and physical activities. J Exerc Physiol2013; 16: 103–131.
32.
ScanlanATDascombeBJKidcaffAP, et al.Gender-specific activity demands experienced during semiprofessional basketball game play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015; 10: 618–625.
33.
KlusemannMJPyneDBHopkinsWG, et al.Activity profiles and demands of seasonal and tournament basketball competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2013; 8: 623–629.
34.
Vazquez-GuerreroJRecheXCosF, et al.Changes in external load when modifying rules of 5-on-5 scrimmage situations in elite basketball. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 3217–3224.
35.
ErčuljFDežmanBVučkovićG, et al.An analysis of basketball players’ movements in the slovenian basketball league play-offs using the SAGIT tracking system. Phys Educ Sport2008; 6: 75–84.
36.
AbdelkrimBNCastagnaCJabriI, et al.Activity profile and physiological requirements of junior elite basketball players in relation to aerobic-anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 2330–2342.
37.
ObaWOkudaT. A cross-sectional comparative study of movement distances and speed of the players and a ball in basketball game. Int J Sport Health Sci2008; 6: 203–212.
38.
LutebergetLSSpencerMGilgienM. Validity of the catapult ClearSky T6 local positioning system for team sports specific drills, in indoor conditions. Front Physiolog2018; 9: 115.
39.
Vázquez-GuerreroJJonesBFernández-ValdésB, et al.Physical demands of elite basketball during an official U18 international tournament. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 2530–2537.
40.
HarperDJCarlingCKielyJ. High-Intensity acceleration and deceleration demands in elite team sports competitive match play: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Sports Med2019; 49: 1923–1947.
41.
CasamichanaDCastellanoJDellalA. Influence of different training regimes on physical and physiological demands during small-sided soccer games: continuous vs. Intermittent format. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 690–697.
42.
DaviesMJYoungWFarrowD, et al.Comparison of agility demands of small-sided games in elite Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2013; 8: 139–147.
43.
Vázquez-GuerreroJFernández-ValdésBJonesB, et al.Changes in physical demands between game quarters of U18 elite official basketball games. PLOS ONE2019; 14: e0221818.
44.
Vázquez-GuerreroJFernández-ValdésBGonçalvesB, et al.Changes in locomotor ratio during basketball game quarters from elite under-18 teams. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2163.
45.
BuchheitMLaursenPB. High-Intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med2013; 43: 313–338.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
